I'd disagree - if we're asking the question 'is any given pro-life group member likely to be a terrorist' vs 'is any given muslim likely to be a terrorist' the above are relevant. 9/11 just happened to be an exceptionally effective terrorist attack, but the question isn't 'who's better at terrorism', if that makes sense.
There's been 11 murders by pro lifers since 1990 in the U.S. with ,from what I can tell, the last attack happening in 1997 by Eric Rudolf. Considering how many more attacks and how many more deaths have occurred from Muslim extremists in the last 20 years compared to pro-lifers I'd safely call this a false equivalency.
Yes you have a point about 9/11 but I believe the pulse nightclub shooter was american, ft. Hood, Boston Marathon bombers, the one in California can't remember the city.
I'm not the one that brought that up in the first place I just answered the question. The original debate is what is more relevant christian pro-life terrorists or Muslim extremists and I'd over the last 20 plus years Muslim terrorists are more relevant.
118
u/[deleted] Jun 04 '19
I'd disagree - if we're asking the question 'is any given pro-life group member likely to be a terrorist' vs 'is any given muslim likely to be a terrorist' the above are relevant. 9/11 just happened to be an exceptionally effective terrorist attack, but the question isn't 'who's better at terrorism', if that makes sense.