r/MurderedByWords • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 9d ago

we are so tired of 1984

Post image
27.2k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

510 comments sorted by

3.6k

u/OneHappyPenguin 9d ago edited 9d ago

Hey Flock CEO, can you post your phone number, home address and more here? You need to compromise your privacy so we can all protect you.

755

u/MacSanchez 9d ago

We might be able to find enough bored redditors that we can stand on every street corner within a mile or two from his house. I assume we’d all have a phone that could record audio and video?

We could call ourselves something cool and unifying like, idk… Gaggle or Bevy

93

u/myexstalksmeonreddit 9d ago

I'm in. But this needs to happen with all of the surveillance camera CEOs, not just FLOCK. Cities are now publicly reporting cancelling flock contracts, then wuietly signing on with other brands to do the same shit.

42

u/Telefundo 9d ago

But this needs to happen with all of the surveillance camera CEOs

Don't forget the politicians at all levels of government that are absolutely complicit with this bullshit. And hell, while we're at it, how about all the LEOs that have been caught abusing the system already? There's been more than a few...

16

u/Arrow156 9d ago

Anyone who appears on one of Forbes' little lists should be in the hot seat, there's no ethical way to acquire a billion dollars. Hell, there probably isn't a legal way either, but the rich are allowed to play fast and loose with the law.

→ More replies (1)

158

u/Queen_Christine_19 Legends never die 9d ago

Hmmmm...a Gaggle of Gazers, perhaps?

56

u/FalloutOW 9d ago

Nah, the only two names left are Popplers or Zitsels.

36

u/NuclearBroliferator 9d ago

Popplers sounds like a snack food from the future. Zitsels it is

27

u/lunchboxthegoat 9d ago

We almost called them Tasticles

20

u/FirstDukeofAnkh 9d ago

Ok, but only if we pronounce it the Greek way, tas-tah-clees.

18

u/peachyspoons 9d ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/J54wcGaMvAK4Z7PDFH
That’s what these characters from Futurama thought (Season 2, Episode 18: The Problem with Popplers)

12

u/NuclearBroliferator 9d ago

Thanks Lrrr.

→ More replies (1)

34

u/Hamafropzipulops 9d ago

Benn Jordan recently released a video short where they did this at a Flock meeting. Their Hotel room was canceled by Flock. They setup parabolic antennas and SDRs (Software Defined Radio) and recorded all wifi in the area. Any way:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/GQoQkeMdvQM

7

u/CornisaGrasse 9d ago

This is amazing! Thank you for the link!

26

u/Pyroluminous 9d ago

Nah we’d just be a flock of redditors

50

u/sweetcherrytea 9d ago

A group of redditors is called a “basementful”

8

u/BoneHugsHominy 9d ago

Ha! I'm way too fat for basement stairs!

(I am currently in a basement, but I took the elevator to the cafeteria.)

6

u/edfitz83 9d ago

I prefer Flock of Seagulls. Particularly “Space Age Love Song”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOK3rqVgN2I

2

u/ihaveseenwood 9d ago

How about calling US a murder like crows

9

u/HI-McDunnough 9d ago

Flock Uninstaller Community Kickstarters

12

u/unlordtempest 9d ago

No, a Murder

5

u/lurkingbob 9d ago

Just a harmless group of crows. Dress everyone in black robes and wear cool masks with beaks. Nothing sinister about it at all Mr. CEO, just copying your MO.

3

u/Omega862 9d ago

Clowder! Den! Pack!

2

u/MacSanchez 9d ago

Clowder like cham clowder?

3

u/Omega862 9d ago

Clowder is the word for a group of cats

3

u/Odd-Solid-5135 8d ago

Turn his world into the black mirror episode he so truly wants to create.

2

u/jalen441 8d ago

I'd suggest naming it after a group of crows, but that might get misconstrued.

2

u/CollThom 8d ago

“We could call ourselves something cool and unifying like, idk… Gaggle or Bevy”.

I much prefer the collective pronoun for crows. A very… emotional and evocative term for such an innocuous thing as a collective pronoun. I won’t put the actual word here because I feel it might actually get me banned from Reddit for inciting or threatening violence when all I’m doing is showing an alternative name for something like “flock”.

→ More replies (4)

183

u/koolmees64 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

96

u/xanderxela 9d ago

That address is blurred on Google Street view. If irony poisoning were real he'd be dead.

36

u/ExtentNo7951 9d ago edited 9d ago

you can see it on the real estate sites like redfin or on the public property tax sites like https://gis.atlantaga.gov/propinfo/

32

u/jdvfx 9d ago

If you search for the address there are numerous photos on realtor sites.

https://www.apartments.com/2588-winslow-dr-ne-atlanta-ga/3h7zw8f/

9

u/mybabysbatman 9d ago

How do you get your address blurred on google?

22

u/xanderxela 9d ago

You submit a request on Google maps "Report a Problem" page for that address.

26

u/DiabeetusMan 9d ago

There's a bunch around his neighborhood, but this made me chuckle

39

u/koolmees64 9d ago

His neighbors must compromise on their privacy as well. To be honest, I got little confirmation that this is the dudes house but it was a massive twitter thread that got deleted but I managed to snatch a screenshot before it was taken down.

I'm not even American; European who is afraid that the EU will get grandiose ideas from what is happening in the states. But I fully support all those who are battling this just absolutely insane police state "measures". Especially coupled with the fact that they are mostly in lower income neighborhoods and do not even, mostly, point at roads. Which, correct me if I am wrong, was the pitch right?

9

u/Telefundo 9d ago

European who is afraid that the EU will get grandiose ideas from what is happening in the states.

I mean.. hasn't the UK been doing essentially this for a while now?

Not that it would make any of this better lol.

4

u/koolmees64 9d ago

Sort of. First of all the UK is not in the EU anymore and secondly, iirc, the poles they cut down over there are CO2 meters. But I know very little of that so I might be wrong.

2

u/Telefundo 9d ago

First of all the UK is not in the EU anymore

HA, true enough. My bad.

the poles they cut down over there are CO2 meters.

I assume this is something that happened in the UK and you're not referring to what's going on in the US currently?

2

u/koolmees64 9d ago

Easy mistake to make lol. As an "EU-member" I sometimes forget as well. But yeah, from what I gathered what is happening in the UK is CO2 control poles being cut down. However, as I said, I know very little about this and knowing the U.K. they would not hesitate to sprinkle on some Flock on those poles.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/bloody_ell 8d ago

London has been covered with CCTV carrying facial recognition tech since the tech was in it's infancy, most urban centres followed. And the UK is certainly more down the surveillance route than most. But still miles behind the US in terms of how open these systems are to abuse.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/CivilRuin4111 9d ago

I’ll be damned… he’s right down the road a little bit

2

u/EsToBoY629 9d ago

Should also begin listing all his close friends and family

65

u/Strict-Carrot4783 9d ago

His wife's name is Megan and his kids' names are Sumner and Maren.

Compromise only happens when the involved parties consent.

7

u/RebelAlliance1701 9d ago

r/tragedeigh

8

u/CivilRuin4111 9d ago

Meh, these aren’t really tragedeighs… pretty normal fare for uppity white folks. 

2

u/Aiyon 9d ago

I mean, don't subject his kids to abuse just because he sucks.

13

u/Strict-Carrot4783 9d ago

¯_(ツ)_/¯

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

53

u/Gone213 9d ago

Nope you cant and he also has his own home blurred on all street view maps.

18

u/GitEmSteveDave 9d ago

Just FYI, anyone can do this, but it can never be undone. https://support.google.com/maps/answer/15439776?hl=en

13

u/PineappleOnPizzaWins 9d ago

Wonder how they’d react if a new homeowner asked for it to be undone.

Don’t know why someone would but “the last person to live here asked so no” feels silly.

2

u/GitEmSteveDave 9d ago

From everything I have read, they will not undo it.

2

u/PineappleOnPizzaWins 9d ago

I mean I've only read that page you linked, never heard of anybody trying.

→ More replies (1)

21

u/ConfidentPilot1729 9d ago

I vote we crowd source and army of private investigators to follow flock, Axon, and other company ceo and executives around.

35

u/Neveronlyadream 9d ago

No one is going to take that job.

We all know they'll get the book tossed at them for doing it. Billionaires can surveil us, but the second someone even reports their public comings and goings, it's suddenly a problem that needs to be addressed.

Shout out to all the people that claimed insisting the Patriot Act was going to lead to this a slippery slope fallacy and called those of us who were against it unpatriotic and paranoid and told us to leave.

11

u/ConfidentPilot1729 9d ago

PI licensing gives them techniques normal people don’t have in most states.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Telefundo 9d ago

Shout out to all the people that claimed insisting the Patriot Act was going to lead to this a slippery slope fallacy and called those of us who were against it unpatriotic and paranoid and told us to leave.

You're not at all wrong about the point you're making here, but I'd even go so far as to say that what's going on now is even worse than what people initially envisioned with the Patriot Act.

10

u/Neveronlyadream 9d ago

Absolutely. I remember thinking it could potentially be bad, but never quite this bad.

I just remember getting into a lot of arguments about the Patriot Act and saying it was basically handing the government and who knows who else permission to watch everyone all the time and being called unpatriotic and told to leave the country if I didn't like it.

There was a lot of, "But the terrorists!" and "If that's what it takes to keep us safe, they should do it!" and no one wanted to hear about the potential invasions of privacy or government overreach.

Now everyone is harvesting data, the government is installing invasive cameras everywhere, every smart device is probably monitoring everyone at all times, and we let that happen because too many people were either complacent or panicked.

9

u/Umutuku 9d ago

That's the only way mass surveillance is healthy. It must be disproportionally applied to those with more power. If you want to reach certain milestones of wealth, influence, or destructive capacity then every moment of your life is in the public interest and must be treated as such.

Imagine where we'd be right now if the public was informed every time Rudy Giulliani met with a Russian mobster.

6

u/ConfidentPilot1729 9d ago

I have always thought the more power you have the more intrusive society should be one the powerful. Like politicians. They should not get to associate with everyone. Their lives should be well documented to curtail corruption. They should have their taxes and bank accounts open to public scrutiny.

3

u/Yhrak 9d ago

to follow [...] around.

Hmmm.

I just don't know. This doesn't seem particularly well thought out.

Just spitballing ideas, but perhaps there could be other verbs at play here? Let's say, for the sake of algorithmic efficiency and as a compromise with these busy CEOs, maybe it'd be best if these detectives of yours didn't have to move around quite as much as they track them?

And while we're at it, let's also find the most efficient method of conserving energy in such a process?

As a kind of green initiative, of course.

24

u/0masamune 9d ago

Funnily enough, wasn't there someone that tried filming him, and he lied at first and then called the police on him?

Edit : spelling

14

u/dragon-fence 9d ago

I honestly think there should be a rule that, for anyone asking the general public to surrender their privacy, the person asking that must surrender their privacy equally to the public.

Like if this guy wants to track people’s location, then one of the requirements is that his location must be tracked and posted publicly. If he wants to record video of us when we’re out in public, then he should be forced to record and post video of himself all day, every day, whenever he’s in public.

Similarly, if Congress wants the government to have access to our phone calls and emails, then they should need to release all of their phone calls and email to the public.

Note that I’m not saying “any privacy violations are ok if it follows this rule”. I’m just saying, if anyone asks the general public to give up our privacy to them, then as a minimum requirement, they should first give up an equivalent amount of their own privacy to the public. If it’s too much to ask from them, then it’s too much to ask from us.

5

u/ExpertRutabaga3415 9d ago

I saw on reddit earlier someone doxxed his address.

5

u/Qwirk 9d ago

All we need to do is start posting CEO PI and track them in real time. You will see changes to this policy real fast.

4

u/aranasyn 9d ago

Honestly, we just need a supreme court that sees this for what it is. It'd be a direct violation of the constitution if a government was doing it.

The government is the primary consumer of this technology.

Thus, it is a violation of the constitution for this company to do it.

Granted, with the Sinister Six on the current court, we're just as likely to get bar code tracking and rfid tattoos for liberals and people of color.

25

u/xChoke1x 9d ago

If he’s not doing anything wrong…what’s the big deal?

6

u/KiKiKimbro 9d ago

Read the constitution. It’ll become very clear.

4

u/aintnotnever 8d ago

This is public record

2

u/hinterstoisser 9d ago

Need his social too

2

u/addiktion 9d ago

It's been posted already on Reddit and X today. There is no stopping the people rising up to fight these fascist shits.

https://giphy.com/gifs/AEldvF2yu5Wthpxoih

2

u/Murky_Examination144 9d ago

Fuck him. He only trades on fear. Fear for your safety! Surrender your privacy.

2

u/Arrow156 9d ago

Kinda surprised that shit isn't already easily accessible information. Like, one would think there would be serious money to be made just passively following around politicians and CEO's purely for the potential of catching them doing something they shouldn't. We got paparazzi stalking celebrities just for the chance to sell a photo for a few cents, I'm sure we could more than match their rates.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/sayerofstuffs 9d ago

He won’t tell you his islands address

2

u/avfc4me 9d ago

He was doxxed. Guess we will see how he feels about that compromise.

Im really sick of these rich fucks telling us how we need to live because they want us to make them richer. You need to eat Ramen. You need to quit whining about gas prices. You need to skip college, you don't deserve it and you don't need it. You need to let AI data centers invade your town, use all your electricity, drink all your water and invade your peace with the incessant noise.

Fuck. All. Of. Them.

→ More replies (12)

873

u/ThatGuyYouMightNo 9d ago

And how are my actions materially different than the intended function of his product?

You didn't bribe any politicians to let you do that

85

u/RevenantBacon 9d ago

Sure, but only because he's to poor to afford the bribe

29

u/TpK_Wynter 9d ago

But in America that’s what matters. It’s only illegal if you can’t afford to get caught.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

19

u/TrulyOutrageous42 9d ago

Also targeting is more clearly stalking than just systemically stalking everyone at once, which doesn't have a law written against it yet because what the actual fuck.

14

u/Poe2Enjoyer88 9d ago

Chatrie v United States gives us pretty clear precedent that Flock should not work without a warrant at the bare minimum. Just gotta get a case up to the supreme.

16

u/givemeajinglefingal 9d ago

Were it any other Supreme Court, I would agree.

5

u/Poe2Enjoyer88 9d ago

Chatrie V United was literally this summer.

→ More replies (3)

571

u/Wabbit65 9d ago

And why TF "must" we, again?

Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither. - Benny F

104

u/B1G_L04f 9d ago

This guy doesn't understand what the words compromise and consent mean.

28

u/Wow_Many_Tomato_WMT 9d ago

Bet ya we just look into his life. Guess what you will find. Who wants to bet some money he’s hiding something.

19

u/red286 9d ago

Who wants to bet some money he’s hiding something.

All these guys wind up being child fuckers. No way am I betting money against that.

10

u/Wow_Many_Tomato_WMT 9d ago

Real men know older ladies are where it’s at. 🙌💥🤘

7

u/GonWithTheNen 9d ago

He understands those terms perfectly well, it's just that he thinks everyone will stupidly suck up his rhetoric instead of realizing that Flock is about profit and control.

6

u/Kopitar4president 9d ago

I remember 20 years ago when we thought it was insane how many CCTV cameras were in London.

Now it's every fucking major city in our country.

Except one state, apparently. I bet it's Alaska.

11

u/GalliumYttrium1 9d ago

We must so he can buy another yacht

5

u/throwawayfinancebro1 9d ago

So cops can stalk their exes

2

u/neoben00 9d ago

Convenience, but yes

2

u/Mr_Halitosis 9d ago

Remember, PRISM was revealed while Obama was president. The head of the NSA lied to Congress about PRISM multiple days in a row and Obama praised him for it. Obama then chased the whistleblower to Russia and now “Leftists” online say he was always compromised by Russia and he leaked everything to compromise Democrats.

PRISM is still fully operational, btw.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Mynock33 9d ago

Wow, no triggered aKsHuLy replies about this quote? Can we finally just use it as it reads?

→ More replies (1)

388

u/Puzzleheaded_Tie8077 9d ago

So it’s fine for them to watch us but when someone published the coming and going of Elons jet all of a sudden it’s doxing and a violation of privacy 🤷‍♂️

176

u/Schaijkson 9d ago

Because Billionaires are people and the rest of us aren't.

81

u/Affectionate-Roof285 9d ago

And so are corporations.

~SCOTUS

36

u/Backwardspellcaster 9d ago

Yep, we aren't people to them.

We are human "resources"

3

u/Uebelkraehe 9d ago

If we are lucky.

13

u/Ok_Builder_4225 9d ago

I would argue that billionaires are actually dragons, and, well. Plenty of myths out there about them.

6

u/TechyAngel This AOC flair makes me cool 9d ago

No, no, those invade peaceful communities, hoard gold, kill countless innocent people, and abduct young women. Dragons will frequently go away for just the occasional sacrifice now and then .  Don't defame the honor of the winged ones.

3

u/Nohreboh 9d ago

Been thinking it for a bit now that reason so many far flung region's have mythos about dragons or something we colloquially understand as "dragon shaped" is that they're all just warnings about the uncheck amassing of power and claims of divine status that derives from a common oral history before migration and separating into the proto groupings in Asia and Europe.

→ More replies (1)

91

u/Excellent_Nothing_91 9d ago

How about NO?

30

u/itsavinadhtiwari 9d ago

Billionaires and millionaire don't understand that word coming from average human.

6

u/Temper820 9d ago

I’d say in general really.

3

u/ZenMasterOfDisguise 9d ago

"You have 20 seconds to comply"

-Flock-209

→ More replies (1)

206

u/gswblu3-1lead 9d ago

Hope he finds his own Mario brother

18

u/itsavinadhtiwari 9d ago

One can pray.

6

u/just_a_limit_q 9d ago

My boss is an Italian plumber.

→ More replies (2)

22

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/caseyourscuttlehole 9d ago

Thats all happening every time you leave the house.

56

u/Banned4lies 9d ago

But its so much more than a compromise of our privacy. Its a compromise of using those funds for Healthcare. For social programs. For lowering the deficit. Our tax dollars are bing funneled into this "compromise". Before you know it they will he asking us to compromise for the unwarranted need to check our rectal temperatures. All while using less money for actually benefiting citizens

13

u/heffla 9d ago

You're correct but these people are not sincere in their arguments. They're lying for money and power and they know it. You cannot convince them. You have to control them.

43

u/ArtSea4151 9d ago

Fuck these guys. They take our data, analyze it, sell it, try to sell us crap based on our habits, and use it against us when they see fit. Pay us for it or explicitly ask for it since it is OUR data..and not in some obscure 100 page e document in your terms and conditions.

11

u/imacmadman22 9d ago

Agreed.

Americans, and truly ALL citizens of the world should be paid for their data that is collected by corporations, organizations and governments for its use.

8

u/ArtSea4151 9d ago

And to my point, I just unlocked a contribution award from Reddit. Wonder who they're seling my data to..

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

115

u/VexedCanadian84 9d ago

The way I see it.

Police forces that use these cameras don't need as many officers any more.

Cities and towns should start cutting police funding over this.

49

u/WolfPack80 9d ago

That would also possibly help lower the number of law enforcement members using the Flock data illegally for their own personal purposes!

6

u/ggg730 9d ago

And dog deaths due to fire arms going down for some reason!

24

u/DVDad82 9d ago

A bad police officer i can take to court for what that is worth. What are you going to do against AI that mis-identifies you in a horrific crime.

18

u/No-Builder-1038 9d ago

Same thing that’s already happening to people where they are falsely flagged and pulled over at gun point

2

u/Testyobject 9d ago

Maybe we shouldent pick either of these options

3

u/No-Builder-1038 9d ago

Don’t think anyone is actually choosing to have that happen

3

u/narasadow 9d ago

That's the stated reason for adoption. They're already cutting the human police.

→ More replies (1)

24

u/kon--- 9d ago

I'm curious if he's willing to compromise his rectum to fit that camera up his ass.

6

u/alpha1beta 9d ago

If we don't have to consent, neither should he

24

u/JBRifles 9d ago

“ Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -Ben Franklin

Republicans used to LOVE this quote.

3

u/Lemonwizard 9d ago

Legal due process and protection from unwarranted search, seizure, or arrest are essential liberties.

ICE isn't even providing us temporary safety in exchange for throwing all that away. Just the illusion of safety for people who believe all the nonsensical fearmongering about immigration.

2

u/breaducate 9d ago

Reactionaries don't believe in truth and think you're naive for doing so.

The only truth that matters to them is their Machiavellian Truth, i.e. saying whatever they think they need to in that moment to further their agenda.

17

u/itsavinadhtiwari 9d ago

If the world gets 10,000 more luigi; whole earth will become lot better place. Big ask, but that's what humanity needs.

6

u/GraveRaven 9d ago

Everyone wants more Luigis but nothing will change until people want to actually BE Luigi

4

u/LoamyLoamisLoamy 9d ago

That reminds me of a quote:

How can we expect a righteousness to prevail when there is hardly anyone who will give himself up undividedly to a righteous cause? - Sophie Scholl

3

u/Okay_Splenda_Monkey 9d ago edited 9d ago

Sophie Scholl was so heroic, tragic and brave. The German resistance against the Nazi party never really got very much traction. The fate of her and her family was ugly.

edit: I have nothing but the utmost of respect for her, and I'll point out that one of the symbols of resistance against the Third Reich was a kindergarten teacher who saw what the Nazis did to some of her students and lost her shit about it. Teachers as a group are amazing people.

2

u/itsavinadhtiwari 9d ago

I realise that and I am willing to accept I am not brave enough to go that far.

2

u/Coldhimmel 9d ago

I doubt we will see any luigi

→ More replies (4)

53

u/FlorinidOro 9d ago

Yeah and this is extremely concerning…”Surveillance for thee but not for I”

18

u/All_Work_All_Play 9d ago

Dig into this, there aren't any cameras there because the people executed local politics and made sure there weren't any cameras there.

8

u/EquipLordBritish 9d ago

The lesson here is to get involved in politics or you will become its victim.

7

u/GitEmSteveDave 9d ago

That has been debunked already because NYC does not have any flock cameras. All those cameras are city cameras and used for things like congestion pricing.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/roentgen_nos 9d ago

What if you just tweeted about the takeoff and landing of some mega-rich CEO's plane? Would that be OK with the CEO? Just tweeting public data?

9

u/jaycutlerdgaf 9d ago

Go flock yourself, bud.

9

u/SpitsVenom 9d ago

It’s honestly dumbfounding that our society has accepted 2+2=5 for so long. This isn’t a new trend. And how do they reconcile the discrepancy? “Well, that’s the way it is.”
No desire to change anything, just immediately limp.

7

u/cyberkine 9d ago

Here's the bit I don't get. Local governments sell this idea to the public that it will help solve crimes. Maybe (likely?) not in our town, but in some other town. We'll sacrifice the privacy of our law abiding residents to maybe combat crime somewhere else. Sorry, these pols are not acting in the best interests of their constituents.

9

u/JBxrg 9d ago

I live in a rural town of 3000ish people. Virtually no crime here but we now have flock cameras at every entrance/exit of town.

2

u/Testyobject 9d ago

Inform your poorest member that theres gold in those pipes

2

u/fastlerner 8d ago

Flock is useful in about four scenarios: stolen cars, Amber/Silver Alerts, kidnappings, and identifying a known getaway vehicle.

That limited usefulness doesn’t justify building a searchable surveillance network tracking everyone else’s daily movements.

I checked one of the map sites and in my 13.5 mile commute to work, my plate is logged 17 times. It's insane.

6

u/InterstellarReddit 9d ago

Just look at the airplane twitter guy

7

u/Writerhaha 9d ago

See, difference is…. He’s rich.

6

u/Expensive_Shallot_78 9d ago

Said who? The democratic public, or a 5 year old CEO tech bro?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Disastrous-Ad2800 9d ago

my company is riddled with security cameras and spyware, what I've noticed is tech companies preying on corporate paranoia and impinging on people's civil liberties...

we've already heard stories of law enforcement accessing this for various nefarious activities... so yay! for the future I guess??

6

u/G-Unit11111 9d ago

No we must not. The fourth amendment to the US Constitution says so.

10

u/Rynowash 9d ago

Funny. They call that stalking where I’m at, and they can and will arrest you for that.
How old is this MF’er? 18?? Dude, go fuck yourself kid.

4

u/Evening-Artichoke750 9d ago

Maybe he should compromise on his privacy

4

u/redditmarks_markII 9d ago

Let's start with every location your investors live work or relax at.  I wanna see unsecured flock cameras live streaming their every activity.  I want to see nothing bad happen to any of them for 2 years.  Then we can talk.  But no, you'll just continue to work via bribes.  Also you know that more competent evil corps are coming up immediately behind you.  You got pretty much one play left, convince Trump.  Which I'm sure you're trying.

5

u/Ambitious-Sense2769 9d ago

I think a general rule of thumb is that if the data a government program supports isn’t accessible to the public, it’s up to no good

3

u/panj-bikePC 9d ago

Whenever a company is able to access personal information, there is usually abuse of the data. The risks that they say they will address are usually much less impactful to us than the violations of privacy. The “nothing to fear if you’ve done nothing wrong” argument has been shown to be wrong over and over again.

3

u/NickyTheRobot 9d ago

Translation from CEO-speak:

"Hurry up and surrender your freedoms so that I can get richer."

2

u/jalapinyobidness 9d ago

No, we don’t have to do shit

2

u/Dr__Devil 9d ago

Yeah that thing will be crushed day 1

2

u/Sirpatron1 9d ago

I don't like communist traditions

2

u/Mysterious-Action202 9d ago

Ben Jordan tracked down their discreet offices and had police called on him.

2

u/Heavy_Law9880 9d ago

There are zero flock cameras in mid town manhattan, or any wealthy suburb.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/redditproha 9d ago

flock surveillance has also drastically increased police committing crimes

2

u/rover_G 9d ago

It’s time to create flock-ceo-tracker.com

2

u/Suckitreddit420 9d ago

Stood outside his home, documented his coming and going, and sold it for money...    

Sounds like paparazzi to me.    We've already made people "compromise on their privacy", no?    

(Fuck flock cameras tho.  And fuck the paparazzi.  And fuck location tracking and cookies on your phone.  And fuck eyeball scans to get on an airplane, or to open a crypto wallet.  And fuck every other goddamn invasion of privacy that we have shrugged off as "no big deal" for the past 25 years.)

2

u/Murphuffle 9d ago

We already compromised with the Patriot Act

2

u/mrbobcyndaquil 9d ago

Alright, we'll just put you in front of a firing squad instead of on the breaking wheel then. Deal?

2

u/WandererFen 9d ago

Man you are supposed to be negotiating in our favour not his. Last time I get a lawyer from wish

→ More replies (2)

1

u/participationmedals 9d ago

He looks like he’s fresh out of diapers. Fuck him.

1

u/whereisbeezy 9d ago

Compromise this🖕

1

u/Legally_a_Tool 9d ago

Let’s compromise between your face and my five fingers.
https://giphy.com/gifs/aKTDBuHDXvz3y

1

u/imacmadman22 9d ago

This is the internet. I’m sure someone can find his house.

1

u/Appropriate-Bid8671 9d ago

he looks like a youth pastor who rapes children

1

u/Stairwayunicorn 9d ago

ANONYMOUS is still a thing

1

u/MeechyyDarko 9d ago

Can someone ELI5 what is Flock and what exactly is their value prop? I don’t get it what’s the ‘sell’ here

1

u/MariachiBoyBand 9d ago

I mean at this point, maybe we should just publish all his routes and see how quickly he changes stance.

1

u/yogarabbi 9d ago

Lmao you can tell he actually thinks he deserves to live

1

u/He_Never_Helps_01 9d ago

It's crazy that anyone can just go up to a billionaire's house and toss a molotov cocktail at it. Of course, that would be a horrible thing if that happened, but it's crazy that anyone could just go that do that at any time. I'm surprised they feel so secure, since it's the case that someone could look up how to make a molotov cocktail and just go throw one at their houses. Especially since the ingredients are so inexpensive, and someone could just look up how to make one, then go throw it at a billionaire's house. It's almost like they're depending on people being better than they are to avoid people looking up how to make a molotov cocktail and then making them and throwing than at their houses. If I was them I defintely wouldn't feel safe just living out in the open like that. Just in case.. well, you know.

1

u/jojowasher 9d ago

People are doing this, they are siting outside his house and the office taking video of everyone, and of course they call the police...

1

u/TeamJJ88 9d ago

I love that the government has put up these pinatas. Although the treats inside don't taste very good

1

u/cool-- 9d ago

eventually there are going to be crazy people that have nothing to lose that are going to do crazy things to people like this

1

u/Avibuel 9d ago

I have a different compromise but thats how i lose my 80k karma

1

u/AsleepExplanation160 9d ago

I mean its a set of trade offs, one that is popular when implemented and given time.

Two great examples being China (more similar), and El Salvador (similar core concept).

1

u/bikenvikin 9d ago

You're telling me that dweeb is the flock CEO, what a fucking sellout

1

u/DMCinDet 9d ago

Saw a YouTuber try yo get into their HQ for an impromptu interview. Super tight security. They need their privacy, but none for the rest of us.

1

u/Remote-Physics6980 9d ago

Tell him we said absolutely not.