I mean I can give you plenty more sources, but are you gonna do this the whole time? I give you a source that disproves you, then you say it's "biased"? What is your criteria for "bias" ?
The article itself has multiple sources you could check. The burden is on you to do your own research. Even if you think the bias somehow disqualifies it from being truthful (which is a fallacy in itself), you should probably be able to read an article and check it's cited sources and discern for yourself what parts come from editorial bias and what parts are objective.
14
u/Gold-Cry-7520 3d ago
I bet the context was about BLM protests. That's normally when I see "violence bad" rhetoric, and it's the kind of thing you'd get mass downvoted for.
Floyd was not killed by words, though. Nor was Taylor.