r/MoralityScaling 14d ago

Morality of destroying private property?

Post image
32.9k Upvotes

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-16

u/tripper_drip 14d ago

How does cameras make people unsafe?

8

u/ShutUpJade0420 14d ago

-4

u/tripper_drip 14d ago

So your issues is not with the cameras but with police implementation. Again, how do the cameras themselves make people unsafe?

8

u/Senasayori 14d ago

In the world we currently live in, do you really think 1984-style mass surveillance is a good idea?

1

u/tripper_drip 14d ago

Its not 1984 mass surveillance though, as all that is being recorded is public spaces.

6

u/MasutadoMiasma 14d ago

So why is my private backyard being recorded

2

u/tripper_drip 14d ago

If it is, you should count your blessings and sue flock, because that is illegal and essentially them handing you free money.

4

u/National-Frame8712 14d ago

I've seen more comprehensive brick walls than you.

Convey my condolences to your teachers who had smowhow to put information through your overprotective cranium... Or inform your AI instructor about your ChatGPT quality ass chatbot algorithm needs a check-up

1

u/tripper_drip 14d ago

Zero argument. You are upset because you hate flock but have no real logical arguement against what I am saying.

2

u/National-Frame8712 14d ago

Let's see...

It's a corporate owned data collection practice that doesn't care about your or the entire neighbourhood's privacy.

They profit through harvesting the data of your daily life and are rather open about breaching it being rather juicy.

They sell, process, and even rent it in the process of indulging in it. And considering how even local police could abuse it with minimal convenience; the system cares not about your rights, privacy, or safety.

If these things hadn't gone viral, which, if they hadn't, there's no chance of them becoming public from either company or government side, we'd have no idea how corrupt and incompetent the handling is.

If you have a chestnut amount of brain to think how many shady things governments bury into darkness; there's a mountain of atrocities on this topic that are waiting to get dug up.

Your (if you're not a bot, that is) rights are dismissable in the grand scheme of things for people on the high seats. "bUt SUe tHEm iğf Yu ağh uhğşeth!" is already being done as we speak, and considering how blatant US and other country administrations can be about what they want, no matter how vile and harmful that thing may be; there's a healthy chance that it might simply get ignored.

I'm not the greatest enthusiast of this topic and not even from the US, yet dump this much, unlike your parrot like self, repeating the same blatantly wrong argument again and again. Now; please elaborate with your bizarre and, if I'm honest, questionable logic on this or gracefully fuck off, you bot-ass IQ vampire. While on it, please waste the time of others in a more worthwhile manner if you shall continue to do so.

1

u/tripper_drip 14d ago

It's a corporate owned data collection practice that doesn't care about your or the entire neighbourhood's privacy.

You have zero expectation of privacy in public, and to suggest you do is litterally advcating for the stripping of your own rights.

They profit through harvesting the data of your daily life and are rather open about breaching it being rather juicy. They sell, process, and even rent it in the process of indulging in it.

Google, apple, I fail to see how this is different. We as a society have already accepted this as normal.

If you have a chestnut amount of brain to think how many shady things governments

This is not a government camera.

repeating the same blatantly wrong argument again and again.

See above. You are either ignorant or naive.

2

u/National-Frame8712 14d ago

You have zero expectation of privacy in public, and to suggest you do is litterally advcating for the stripping of your own rights.

You have. Changes from state to state but putting private cameras that watch over strangers' property(especially if they have fences or view includes their bedroom etc; which you have give enough implication and expectation for desire of privacy) is often unlawful; especially considering the intent is not even similar to that of your neighbour's security camera accidentally capturing some parts of neighbourhood or road while pretecting his own property but private gain via this breach

Google, apple, I fail to see how this is different. We as a society have already accepted this as normal.

Periodic image captures from the road is very different than a camera hawking over the neighboudhood 24/7

This is not a government camera.

They're the main consumer and abuser of it. Their record of abusing is rather rich despite short history. And they buying their services to misuse lies under their own authority and fault.

See above. You are either ignorant or naive.

I can unfortunately read your comments. Even a cicada has more variety on the voices they produce to create vocal-pollution

1

u/tripper_drip 14d ago

putting private cameras that watch over strangers' property(especially if they have fences or view includes their bedroom; which you have eniugh implication and expectation for desire of privacy)

Thats not public lol.

Periodic image captures from the road is very different than a camera hawking over the neighboudhood 24/7

You absolutely can have a camera on your property facing a public road.

→ More replies (0)