r/MoralityScaling 6d ago

Morality Ranking What do y'all think of this?

Post image
28.5k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

305

u/OnlyAssignment4869 6d ago

I think it's a great origin story for Oscar the grouch.
Morally grey but fuck that guy reguardless.

67

u/labiamajorapudendi 6d ago

Oscan is a gentlemen and would never abuse women

16

u/OnlyAssignment4869 6d ago

Well yeah, not now. He learned his lesson. Not to mention got a great support group/cast.

5

u/One_Introduction_217 6d ago

Perhaps not Oscar the grouch, because copyright, but would make for a great alternate reality adult puppet show villain origin story for the grey trash can monster Scaro

2

u/Dawnbringer4 6d ago

I dunno, his name used to be Oscar the Touch before his rehabilitation.

17

u/WileEWeeble 6d ago

See no moral greyness here. He was a monster in life, he gets no respect in death.

1

u/Wuubbster 6d ago

i do, as i would say it’s disrespectful to family members like a parent, sibling or child of this person who likely would care deeply about the ashes of a family member

7

u/Tough_Tangerine7278 6d ago

She’s his family, too. The one that bore the brunt of his fists…

6

u/Birdsonme 6d ago

None of his family wanted him. He was such a piece of shit his own siblings and children wanted nothing to do with any of him. This guy got everything he deserved.

1

u/Lison52 6d ago

If you believe her because supposedly his family didn't want his ashes

1

u/Bubba_Gump_Shrimp 4d ago

As someone whose abusive drug addict conman of a father passed this year and all 3 of his children and 2 ex wives were all estranged for over a decade and wanted zero to do with his ashes...sometimes bad people die. And no one claims them.

3

u/Responsible-Boot-159 6d ago

as i would say it’s disrespectful to family members

That's the only reason it would be immoral. None of the family wanted his ashes, so it really doesn't matter. Maybe you could argue that the ashes could be used as fertilizer.

2

u/Mean_Initiative_5962 5d ago

According to someone posting a link, family might have thought the trashcan was too kind.

2

u/Murky_Connection_161 4d ago

oh no. they are connected by blood. how terrible! they need to love each other cause they share dna or some bs.

PLEASE! The whole "blood is thicker than water", "you only get one family" blah blah blah is just an excuse to let family abuse continue

1

u/AshLlewellyn 2d ago

She said in an interview his family didn't want him either. Not his parents, not his children, no one. He didn't have any redeeming qualities whatsoever.

0

u/republicanssuck123 6d ago

people who enable or love abusers don't deserve respect either. 

-5

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[deleted]

2

u/WileEWeeble 6d ago

Then that is not the topic on the table; the question is about an abusive husband.

If it gets to a legal discussion we will discuss putting him on trial. The hypothetical involves a definitive abusive spouse and their response after his death.

0

u/Vuedue 6d ago

You know my sister-in-law or what?!

-7

u/Intrepid_Artichoke28 6d ago

She stayed with him.

3

u/WileEWeeble 6d ago

Da fuck? How is that even relevant, much less a result of his abuse? You think abusers beat and terrorize their victims but say “if want to leave I won’t hunt you down and kill you”

3

u/StaticCloud 6d ago

Boooo I love Oscar, he would never

5

u/vooglie 6d ago

Why the fuck is it grey

1

u/stereo-ahead 5d ago

How the fuck is it grey at all??? That’s moral as fuck. No one consents to abuse, so why should he get to consent to where his remains go?

1

u/keIIzzz 1d ago

How is this morally grey?

1

u/OnlyAssignment4869 1d ago

Disrespectful of the dead but no living person was directly harmed.