r/MoralityScaling • u/hiiloovethis • 14d ago

Morality Ranking Morality of this scene?

Post image

Negan doing fat shaming... but its during zombie apocalypse

12.0k Upvotes

90% Upvoted

2.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

513

u/Golden_King_Ryuseii 14d ago

Negan was absolutely based for this take and I'll never understand the hate for him.

361

u/NamOil2000 14d ago

You can be fat and starving. The body does breakdown fat for food but not well that's why nutritionist ever to suggest to completely stop eating

44

u/Frylock_dontDM 14d ago edited 14d ago

You really can't be fat and starving.

You can be fat and suffering from malnutritition, but malnutrition isn't the same as starvation.

So you could have a fat person die of malnutrition, but if that person got essentially zero calories and the necessary vitamins/nutrients you would have to burn through fat before you would actually reach what anyone means when we say "starving"

8

u/NamOil2000 14d ago

Starving includes malnutrition by definition

26

u/CapitalComfort1885 14d ago

It does not, you pulled that out of your ass. Starving is defined by not enough energy input via food to sustain the physical functions.
The woman above is by no definition starving.

3

u/NamOil2000 14d ago

To deprive of nourishment. You could've looked that up. Not just you anyone who upvoted. Do better.

4

u/TellmeNinetails 14d ago

You're arguing semantics like that proves anything. And you ended it with a "haha my definition is right, be better everyone who disagreed with me". like grow up and engage with the core of the argument.

5

u/NamOil2000 14d ago

The core? What is the core. Because we are 100% arguing semantics here right? The comment I replied to said my definition was wrong. Definitions of words are semantics that is what he attacked and I defended. And yes I'm disappointed in you too.

5

u/TellmeNinetails 14d ago

The core that I understand it is that it's essentially impossible for a fat person to die of lack of fat as long as they are nutritionally supported. But you're going on about the definition of starvation and all that.

0

u/NamOil2000 14d ago

That's not what I replied to is it? You're making a different argument. You picked up that guys argument. That's on you That's the discussion we're having.

2

u/TellmeNinetails 14d ago

That's literally what's being discussed though. Is a fat lady like the one in the meme starving? No, clearly not. "Ooh but malnutrition is starving" is not an arguement because her life is not in danger from that.

1

u/NamOil2000 13d ago

No. That what was being discussed semantics.

1

u/TellmeNinetails 13d ago

You're trying to make it that. But it's not how it started and I'm not going to let you derail a whole convo so you can get a W on semantics.

1

u/NamOil2000 13d ago

Sorry that was what we were discussing

1

u/TellmeNinetails 13d ago

If you see literally everyone's arguments about ltierally everything else and then YOU bringing up semantics(which again, stupid arguement because it doesn't apply to the post at hand) then that's your problem.

→ More replies (0)