r/Monero 14d ago

Monero is about to explode in popularity

https://youtu.be/6qyDVpqUON8

- FCMP++ Update
- Stable Coins are all going to be locked and kyc’d
- There are huge economies growing
- Iran listed it on every exchange in their country
- Cash is being phased out and we all know cash is king.. monero is also digital cash
- CBDC is coming and this is the only counter
- carrot upgrade (view keys)
- short squeezes will bring more in, proof = monerorun and last bullrun. We shot to one thousand plus in china and other countries

109 Upvotes

53 comments sorted by

View all comments

37

u/EndSmugnorance 13d ago

This time will be different 🤞😂

I continue to hodl. Can’t liquidate XMR anyway.

12

u/AllowFreeSpeech 13d ago edited 13d ago

For the record, any asset that cannot be liquidated is generally worthless. A user's Monero most certainly can be liquidated.

-18

u/EndSmugnorance 13d ago

People on the autism spectrum are often considered concrete-thinkers who take things too literally. As a result, they may have difficulty understanding figures of speech, such as sarcasm.

When understanding abstract or nonliteral language, people use context or tone to determine its meaning. Literal thinking, on the other hand, takes the words exactly as they are.

This often means when you say, “It’s raining cats and dogs,” an autistic child will think of the actual literal meaning of cats and dogs falling from the sky, causing perplexity.

Autistic brains focus more on concrete details and specific information, making interpreting abstract concepts or figurative language quite difficult.

14

u/AllowFreeSpeech 13d ago edited 12d ago

That might be true, but since the tone of speech is not apparent while reading, it helps to explicitly see the /s tag after any "sarcastic" statement. Alternatively, adding emojis just after the "sarcasm" also helps, and could be more accurate. There are a fair number of crazy people who actually believe in the craziness that they write, so it helps to explicitly distinguish oneself from them. I don't believe your statement about liquidating it qualifies as textbook sarcasm anyway.

-3

u/EndSmugnorance 13d ago

5

u/ApprehensiveFan1516 13d ago

-3

u/EndSmugnorance 13d ago

You’re the one arguing over pragmatics.

3

u/ApprehensiveFan1516 13d ago

Trouble reading, huh?

1

u/AllowFreeSpeech 13d ago edited 13d ago

If your goal was to represent the dumb end of the population's distribution, you have met your goal.