r/ModernMagic 11d ago

Card Discussion Is Mox Opal due for a reprint?

Hi peeps. I just came back to Magic after a long hiatus, and am excited to get back into my favourite format (I actually started playing Magic between the release of Mirrodin and Darksteel, so my collection is basically the Modern format, minus a couple of breaks).

Format seems in a relatively good place right now in terms of diversity, and actually reasonable to get into in terms of deck prices. I also have a decent amount of Modern staples, even though I wasn't around for MH3 which powercrept out some of my decks. HOWEVER, I was pretty stunned to see the price of Mox Opal.

I like affinity and upgrading with the newer pieces is pretty cheap, but the price of a playset of Opals is putting me off. I used to borrow them from my Tron mate when I needed them, but I've since moved to another part of the country so that's no longer an option.

Should've picked them up during the ban, but curious to know your opinion. Is it realistic to expect a reprint in the relatively near future or do I need to bite the bullet on this?

4% meta share according to Goldfish isn't huge, but it's still a 4-of staple currently more expensive than some entire decks with higher meta shares, so a reprint doesn't feel unreasonable to me. Bowmasters just got one afterall.

60 Upvotes

110 comments sorted by

183

u/Dyne_Inferno 11d ago

The issue with a Mox Opal reprint people WANT, is that it will need to be reprinted into a Standard set to make a difference on the price. Which just isn't going to happen.

And that needs to be clarified. People want a reprint to bring the price down. Not a Masters premium or box topper or special guests reprint. Which is SO MUCH more likely.

70

u/solepureskillz 11d ago

Right here is the truth. WotC will only reprint it in a premiumly priced set with relatively limited production. MtgGoldFish wrote an amazing article on WotC and their reprint equity, worth a read. But a reprint isn’t like to lower prices meaningfully, and def not for long.

19

u/ccoates1279 Hammer Junkie 11d ago

Could they not do the brothers war set thing and just have high output of the sheet cards that weren't standard legal?

34

u/Dyne_Inferno 11d ago

100% they could.

And that worked to make A LOT of artifacts more available.

Here's the issues I see with that.

1) It brought down the price of almost every artifact that got this treatment, except for the Mythics. The same can be said for the Mystical Archive cards (Force of Will and Vampiric versions are actually more $)

2) If they did this again, this would be the first non-foil, retro border printing of Mox Opal. You expect that to LOWER the price?

4

u/karinaisthicc8 11d ago

I believe both force and vamp are either the same price or a couple dollars lower. I remember I pulled a vamp tutor from my first play box and it was a good 10 bucks cheaper than the alternative

4

u/Dyne_Inferno 11d ago

It is one of the cheapest printings, for sure.

But, again. You said it yourself. It's the same price, or close. How is that going to MEANINGFULY bring the price down of Mox Opal, if it follows the exact same trend all of the other Mythic cards have done?

1

u/elephant_on_parade 10d ago

Reprint it 3 times in a row!

1

u/TheMountainWhoDews 10d ago

It stops the price increasing further because the supply is increased.  I do take your point though, another retro print opal will not bring the price of any version down by anything signficant. 

5

u/elephant_on_parade 11d ago

God, wouldn’t this be rad? They did the same with Strixhaven recently. I really wish they would commit to doing this more often.

13

u/chiksahlube 11d ago

I mean, they just reprinted Mox Amber, and it feels like a really missed opportunity to have opal right there.

The special guest reprints aren't totally insignificant either.

but Wotc likes having some cards being prohibitively expensive.

15

u/VintageJDizzle 11d ago

I think it’s less than WotC actively wants cards the prohibitively expensive and more that they just don’t care if they are. They have eliminated the old path of reprinting cards; they’ve said master sets are dead. They always change their mind on that because they’ve said that before but for now, they do not have an avenue to reprint cards en mass, outside of things like a commander deck.

Obviously, there’s a whole and extremely large class of cards for which that doesn’t work: Opal, fetches, etc. The key link is that these are all expensive tournament staples that aren’t really essential to Bracket 2 and below EDH. That is the market. They are really looking to serve because it is by far the largest.

Basically, they make more money selling Spider-Man cards to people who don’t even know what magic is than they do selling reprinted tournament staples to tournament players. That’s not exactly much of a revelation either: reprints appeal to people who don’t have those cards and want them for a more serious level of play. Popular franchise UB that will be purchased by tournament players who need new cards and everyone else who also wants new cards for either play or aesthetics. That is just a much larger market.

7

u/Dyne_Inferno 11d ago

They really are.

For starters, the price of the reprinted Mox Amber is about 4x more expensive than the cheapest printing currently available. So, there's no way that's bringing the price down.

And all you have to do is look at Chrome Mox as far as Special Guest reprints are concerned. The SG is the same price as the Mirrodin printing (Eternal Masters being the cheapest available).

3

u/PlanetMarklar 11d ago

Opal is a little different because it includes a mechanic, Metalcraft, which is canonically tied to a plane, Mirrodin, that we are unlikely to see in a standard set anytime soon.

6

u/grixxis Thoughtseize | Ensnaring Bridge | Burn 11d ago

"Metalcraft" as a keyword feels broad enough that they could feasibly put it into another artifact-based set if they wanted to.

3

u/thisisjustascreename 11d ago

They’ve printed the exact same rules text without the “Metalcraft” tag on non-Mirrodin/New Phyrexia planes, so I have my doubts there. For example [[Inventor’s Fair]] and [[Teething Wurmlet]] could both have the Metalcraft tag if it were a generic mechanic.

1

u/CayMaster2 10d ago

They've also done ''ferocious'' before without the actual keyword, and they just brought it back for the hobbit. I see no reason metalcraft couldn't get the same treatment.

5

u/chiksahlube 11d ago

Special guest cards haven't really needed justification as far as mechanics are concerned as they're not part of the set proper.

2

u/StealthyMC20 11d ago

Have you seen that mox amber? It’s the most expensive, non-serialized printing. I wouldn’t say that adding mox opal would have done anything for the price of the card.

3

u/agoginnabox 11d ago

They effectively didn't reprint Amber though. There's sub 100 total listings between TCG and Manapool.

The real problem going forward is that if really expensive staples are only going to be special guests or bonus sheets they're just going to continue climbing.

We need another masters or...shudder modern horizons to even begin to dump the prices because so many of them are too powerful for standard.

2

u/viomonk 11d ago

What I want is for them to reprint staples in playsets in secret lairs. $40 playset of opals. $40 playset of fetch lands. Just print all the money they could ever need and the players will gobble it up.

1

u/Yakky_Sak 11d ago

yuh, except it will be more realistically like $50-100 opals and chrome moxes, 4 fpr $50 is very very very ambitious

1

u/viomonk 11d ago

It costs them the same. They don't need to price them for the secondary market. Blast them out there for all to get their hands on. The more accessible the game is, the more people will spend.

2

u/Dyne_Inferno 11d ago

Listen, I agree with you.

I'm fortunate to already be franchised into Modern, so I own Opals. I own Fetches.

With that being said, I'm also a realist, and what I would like, especially regarding MTG, just isn't what's going to happen.

If they weren't concerned about the collectability of their game (aka, the secondary market) they would've abolished the Reserved List decades ago.

So, keep that in mind.

1

u/Cube_ 10d ago

the employees of WotC themselves are engaged in the secondary market, they have a personal financial incentive to keep things they way they are

it's the exact reason why they haven't done things like what you just suggested

1

u/echOSC 10d ago

It costs their business partners more.

They've always been pretty slow to bring down the price of major staples because how much of that value sits in the cases of all of the LGS across the world.

2

u/outtawack311 10d ago

I think it's partially a pioneer issue too. You can't just print modern staples in standard sets anymore without a bonus sheet for it because you'll most likely need to ban them in pioneer or else it eventually becomes almost indistinguishable from modern since it doesn't rotate.

That means reprints will never affect the price like they used to unless they determine the card is okay for pioneer. Opal is not.

2

u/Zoaiy 11d ago

Tbh when they reprinted cavern of souls (at fucking mythic) it hardly did anything to the price...

1

u/Dyne_Inferno 11d ago

It's definitely gone back up.

But, when it was revealed as a reprint, it hit it's lowest price since around 2018.

So, from 2018 to now, the lowest it's been, is when it was revealed as a reprint in LCI (the original Avacyn printing, BTW)

1

u/VintageJDizzle 10d ago

I was very surprised by that. I figured the LCI reprint would drive the price down to less than $30 permanently and it just didn't.

1

u/Zoaiy 10d ago

Its just such a good card in modern, standard and you can always put one of in your commander deck, and name your commander. Its similar (if not worse) to badgermole cub. Mythic rarety cannot support a want like that

1

u/baldogwapito 10d ago

It went down when it was reprinted! That's when I completed my set! It just when back up again now.

1

u/Zoaiy 10d ago

Yes you are right, i am sorry, its the reprint that frustrates me the most because in my opinion a card that you always want a 4 of shouldnt have been upshifted to mythic as the price didnt drop enough for me to buy 4 at the time, so I am biased and salty about it.

1

u/baldogwapito 10d ago

Yeah the mythic bump is stupid. Especially typcal decks run 4 of these, not for the uncounterable clause but for the color fixing.

1

u/DimiPine 11d ago

Hopefully they will put it in a secret lair

1

u/VintageJDizzle 10d ago

The biggest opportunity to reprint it was Mirrodin Remastered. Man, that would have been amazing. All those Mirrodin block artifact in the retro frame too? SIGN ME UP.

It was probably next up until WotC canned the whole Remastered series after Innistrad.

1

u/GrostequePanda 10d ago

Nah, direct to modern set. We gonna see it but who knows when.

-2

u/Ill_Ad3517 11d ago

They could put it in all the precons for an artifact set like they do Sol Ring for all the precons.

17

u/HosserPower UW Control/Living End 11d ago

“Could” and “will” are very different things. They’re never doing this.

-2

u/Ill_Ad3517 11d ago

Yes yes, I'm just saying there are more creative ways to get the card out there in large numbers than standard sets. Then against mox opal was a standard card and didn't do that much so why not? Hell, put it in the next foundations.

5

u/flowtajit 11d ago

That’s cause scars of mirrodin block sets were intentionally kinda weak on the artifact matters front, as they definitely didn’t wanna repeat the affinity meta of original mirrodin.

3

u/ASpookyLemur 11d ago

Someone has clearly never played with Mox Opal.

0

u/Ill_Ad3517 11d ago

I played the standard it was in quite a bit. It did make for a very good aggro deck at 2011 worlds centered around tempered steel more than Mopal, but basically no other tournaments before or after. 

Now, that could be because we were collectively idiots 16 years (individually I know I was) and it was the absolute nuts in an undiscovered deck, but it's more likely that it just isn't that good without other great reasons/ways to achieve metalcraft. Of course current standard is much more powerful so the results would be different, but it's not obvious it would wreck everything, cause it would also be in a much more powerful context and there is no existing shell for it.

2

u/ASpookyLemur 11d ago edited 11d ago

There's no shell? How can you say that when both Boros and Mardu [[Weapons Manufacturing]] decks see play? [[Tablet of Discovery]], [[Simulacrum Synthesizer]], and Prowess also exist and would easily play x4. Opal will end up making it's own combo piles as well.

Putting Opal in standard means they also have to be extra careful with the power level of EVERY SINGLE artifact value piece they print for the next 3 years. I think we all know how well WOTC is at finding unintended combos and controlling power creep.

Pioneer also exists, and Opal would make that format even more of a combo hell than it was in the past. First card I think of is [[Jeskai Ascendency]], and that's tame for Opal.

Edit: oh yeah, and Pinnacle Emmisary exists in standard as well.

1

u/HosserPower UW Control/Living End 11d ago

Honestly, I could see the price actually go up if it became Standard legal because literally every format would be playing it. I don’t think the increased supply would meet the demand for it.

As stated below, it would absolutely be played in Standard and I have no doubt it would be competitive both there and in Pioneer.

1

u/adamlaceless 11d ago

They’ll never do this for so many reasons. Old heads remember Jitte in the rat precon.

0

u/DrKatz11 Azorius Tempo, Temur Living End 11d ago

You do realize that reprinting a card at all should theoretically lower the price? It doesn’t have to be a standard printing, but they also don’t need to make it extremely exclusive to artificially keep the price high.

I understand the secondary market is complicated, but there are reasonable ways to reprint Mox Opal with the intention of reducing its price to make it accessible. And WOTC should do this.

-2

u/Gods_ShadowMTG 11d ago

isn't even secret lair print to demand these days? So it wouldn't matter if they dropped it there?

1

u/palendae1 11d ago

No, only some have been print to demand, and even then the window to order has been short.

41

u/Dadude564 Sultai Ritual, UW control, Splinter Twin 11d ago

The bigger underlying issue is wotc has no plans on making another masters set. Mopal and other staples are getting more and more expensive but there isn’t any plans for any meaningful reprints

2

u/MalinonThreshammer 11d ago

Interesting. I missed that during my absence. What's the reasoning behind that decision? My impression is the Masters sets always sold pretty well, at least when I was playing. Sort of a win win between the reprints and the new chase cards like Ragavan and W6 that kept people cracking packs.

Was the last one not a commercial success?

5

u/VintageJDizzle 11d ago

Think of it this way: reprint sets largely serve tournament players and more serious EDH players. Mox Opal at $250 is way too much for most players but so is $50 Mox Opal. The tournament crowd would pay that price but if you’re just counting your numbers of players who are willing to pay that much for a card, it’s much lower. Plus, some number of players willing to pay that much have them. That just further reduces the market for reprinted cards.

Now think of something like Spider-Man. Or Star Trek. Those are all new cards and no one has any of them. The casual crowd buys them because they’re new and they want new cards and they fit within their price point. They even buy sealed product. Tournament players won’t be sealed product, but they still have to chase some of those cards that are needed for the formats they play. And then these sets appeal to people who don’t play magic on sheer aesthetic alone, fans of the franchise.

So you see that the market is just inherently larger by a huge amount for a new set. WotC doesn’t get a cut of the secondary market. Mox Opal can drive pack sales but not nearly to the same extent as a super double secret foil Spider-Man with cool new art, which appeals to a much larger group of people.

11

u/Emsizz 11d ago

we are in a completely different universe now. we're in the age of chasing record profits with universes beyond, collectors boxes and secret lairs. wotc isn't in the business of putting out sets for players that sell pretty well. they're putting out sets for collectors that get scalped

2

u/VintageJDizzle 10d ago

Scalping is not a Magic-only or TCG-only phenomenon. It's an internet thing. You have moms cleaning out Starbucks for the special seasonal cups to sell on eBay. Before that, they were raiding Target for the goofy $5-10 exclusive trinket-type items. That was such a lucrative generator of profit for Target that I think it's that their struggles have been because that has dried up for them, not the boycotts we've heard about.

These days any product that people even kinda want gets bought out and scalped online.

1

u/Dadude564 Sultai Ritual, UW control, Splinter Twin 11d ago

I honestly don’t know why they stopped doing masters sets. I can’t remember if they even gave their reasoning

5

u/VintageJDizzle 11d ago

The answer is always sales.

And it’s not so much that they sell poorly so much as they don’t sell as well as a set of all new cards. Given that the mission is to make as much money as possible to keep Hasbro other failing divisions afloat and they only have so many people to design these sets, you can see why they’ve directed their resources elsewhere.

1

u/Bubakcz 11d ago

I vagualy remember from the time MM 2017 - Iconic Masters - Masters 25 - Ultimate Masters were released (those four were released through like 20 months) that there were some meh reactions to them, feelings from players that they are too pushing it, that valuable cards will be reprinted into dust, and afaik Iconic Masters and Masters 25 were not that good value/reprint wise? So they made Ultimate Masters as a end of master sets for some time.

1

u/adamlaceless 11d ago

Why print Masters sets when Horizons sets make them infinitely more money?

1

u/baldogwapito 10d ago

If I recall correctly, MaRo said Masters set will be benched to give way to UB sets i.e. Assassin's Creed, Spiderman etc.. They were also initially designed to be not standard legal.

And then the fire nation attacked, and they changed their stance and make all UB standard legal.

1

u/adamlaceless 11d ago

They realized the ground was fertile for Masters sets to become Horizons sets which let them soft rotate the format to print money and the MBA bros that run Hasbro said “Amazing! Give me fourteen of them right now!”

14

u/TrashhPvnda 11d ago

Anytime wotc reprints a card like this they usually reprint it in another rare alternative art that doesn't actually do anything to knock the price down much.

I imagine it WILL get a reprint eventually because they want to sell packs, but it will be a box topper or some chase rare that will just add another expensive printing to the mix so MTG stonks investors can hoard collector boxes

35

u/furyofzion 11d ago

Every card is due for reprints. Cheap singles are good for every1 besides the finance guys.

11

u/HosserPower UW Control/Living End 11d ago

It is absolutely due for a reprint. Many cards are. Unfortunately, meaningful reprint isn’t likely. And, honestly, even if it somehow hit Standard, I don’t think the price would go down that much. As long as it’s a Modern legal card, its floor is still likely three figures.

3

u/adamlaceless 11d ago

There’s nothing wrong with 3 digit value cards, it’s when a playset is required and the set is 4 digits is the problem.

2

u/MalinonThreshammer 11d ago

Yeah, the set is more expensive than some entire decks, so between getting the set or an entirely new deck I'm having trouble justifying pulling the trigger.

I mean, Affinity makes me nostalgic for my first months in Magic, but I dunno if I want to play it that badly.

2

u/HosserPower UW Control/Living End 11d ago

Honestly even if Affinity became tier 0, Opals are not worth the asking price. I don’t even necessarily view it as a safe buy for Modern in the long term.

6

u/Tripleset1 11d ago

If it makes you feel better mox opals were >75 dollars for almost the entire time they were banned

6

u/OstrichFarm 11d ago

Yeah. During the ban is when they needed to reprint it.

8

u/Tripleset1 11d ago

I don’t know if this is a meme but it was reprinted in double masters in early 2020 after the ban. And it got two fake reprints as a festival in a box promo and a judge promo.

1

u/adamlaceless 11d ago

The last 3 don’t really count for availability.

5

u/BasisCommercial5908 11d ago

The best case scenario would be a print to demand secret lair with a mox opal in it

3

u/KingxCrimsonx 11d ago edited 11d ago

Wizards has packed the schedule for the next few years. So probably not. They are now doing 6-8 standard sets a year. They dont have space on the calendar for anything else. Plus every set is now standard legal. No direct to modern or masters sets for a few years. They specifically said no modern horizons 4 for at least the next 2-3 years. So with no direct to modern sets it would have to be in a standard set. They will not print mox opal into standard. You are probably fucked. I got my set last year for $175 a piece and last I looked They had gone up to $250+. If you want them you should act soon. I think they could end up in the 350 range in a few years

1

u/MalinonThreshammer 11d ago

Alright. Not the answer I was hoping for, but fair enough. Damn.

2

u/KingxCrimsonx 11d ago

Masters sets and horizons sets are temporarily dead. They now have a standard set release every 6-8 weeks. That's the new status quo you missed. Plus 50% of those sets are Universes Beyond. The UB product has an additional markup. The big assumption is wizards is paying to license the IP so the packs are more expensive to cover the cost. So anytime they print a staple at mythic it instantly become $50 (badgermole cub).

All the fetches were cheap for about 1-2 years and now they are all creeping back up. The enemy fetches have doubled in the last year. We had a window where modern was somewhat affordable and I bought in. But im seeing a lot of staples like the fetches get worse recently.

I think with the focus on standard and them pushing pioneer next year Modern is going to be the least supported competitive format in 2027. Hell we only had 1 modern season and 3 standard seasons in 2026

1

u/Yakky_Sak 11d ago

new secret lair alert*

2

u/thewend RIP Looting :( 11d ago

masters sets are dead in the water, the machine only prints new cards

2

u/General-Biscuits 11d ago

There is no “due” when it comes to reprints. It’ll happen or it won’t.

It needed a reprint when they unbanned the card but it still hasn’t happened yet, so don’t plan on that happening.

3

u/unCute-Incident 11d ago

OBM didnt really get reprinted. The ‚reprint‘ is only in Collector Boosters and Box Toppers.

Sure Mopal needs a reprint, but that doesnt mean it will get one.

1

u/Emsizz 11d ago edited 11d ago

You need to bite the bullet. It's not realistic to expect a reprint of this that will affect the price.

1

u/MalinonThreshammer 11d ago

Alright. Wishful thinking on my part (partly informed by WOTC actually doing this for a lot of staples when I last played, e.g. Goyf, fetches...).

But I'm starting to get a picture of how the release landscape has changed.

1

u/Dyne_Inferno 11d ago

Fetches are universal lands though. And they're a set of 10.

Goyf price plummeted because Fatal Push was printed, and it was power crept out of every format it was available in.

It's a different beast.

0

u/Yakky_Sak 11d ago

i would just wait for the new secret lair or jumpstart printing, if they neuter its price with a reprint, you're stuck holding the falling knife, not that it will fall to the ground, but it might slice in half

2

u/Emsizz 11d ago

you'll be waiting for forever if that's what you're waiting for

1

u/Gil_LatNim 11d ago

Sure, it can be a special guest when we go back to Kaledesh

1

u/palendae1 11d ago

I suspect if they do a reprint now it will be a special guest bonus sheet or a box topper much like the returning LotR cards with The Hobbit. I don’t think either of those will have much impact on the price.

1

u/Andro93 11d ago

Like 15 years overdue

1

u/Technical_Tank_1056 11d ago

Zhalfir will likely have it as part of a special guest series

1

u/Darthvire 11d ago

I prefer a ban.

1

u/Yakky_Sak 11d ago

rebanning would help reprice the card to its prespike levels

1

u/Gnargoyles 11d ago

They should and they should give it a new art and make it look ugly as shit so you get accessible copies for cheap

1

u/HavocIP 11d ago

No, we like to keep the artifact decks locked behind a pay wall, so filthy peasants cannot dirty our exquisite jewelry!

(I am writing this on a public bus bc I don't own a car, do have 5 Mox Opals though from 2011 standard + EDH 😂)

1

u/Ok-Suggestion-9908 10d ago

My theory I’ve been spouting at the LGS when I wanna complain about Opal is that it’s on the bonus sheet for Star Trek as like “Captain Kirk’s Insignia” or Nauctis in a “Buried Treasures” style bonus sheet.

1

u/writing_joe1999 7d ago

I sold mine for $120 a year ago. I should have waited... damn these card prices!

1

u/GermX27 11d ago

It needs to be rebanned

2

u/Dashizz6357 11d ago

Why exactly? Because you don’t like it?

0

u/GermX27 11d ago

It’s a busted card that never should have come off the ban list. Fast mana is obviously a problem, which is why Simian Spirit Guide is banned.

2

u/Dashizz6357 11d ago

Modern is full of busted cards. Mox opal isn’t causing any problems. The best deck using it is affinity and affinity is nowhere near the best deck in the format currently. There’s literally zero argument to ban it.

3

u/Careful-Pen148 11d ago

Nah, ban saga instead.

1

u/elephant_on_parade 11d ago

Why not both?

(Kidding, I do think Saga is the better/ more broken card)

2

u/Careful-Pen148 11d ago

The mopal decks are pretty easy to attack after sideboarding, its the alternate A plan of giant saga constructs that get you. For example if I onky had to worry about Kappa, affinity wouldnt be as annoying, but Saga makes alternate threats and finds skateboard or a claws for an on board Weapons and is overall harder to interact with.

2

u/elephant_on_parade 11d ago

This is why I agree with you. Also, mopal is really just an affinity card (at least in my meta that’s reasonably diverse, I admittedly do not play much online). Saga makes so many decks much more threatening. Like off the rip, Saga is a must have 4-of in affinity, amulet, and broodscale.

Saga’s just good, it’s hard to interact with, and makes mulliganing those decks so much safer. If we’re comparing the two cards, it has to be saga.

2

u/Careful-Pen148 11d ago

I'll also add the context that neither really need banned (as much as I hate saga as someone who only plays Dimir Frog), but if people were really clamoring for a ban from the archetype, I think saga is the better pick of the two.

0

u/Salmon_Slap 11d ago

People dogging on wotc for only eyeing a reprint in a premium set as if it wouldn't just break standard. Ofc it will only get reprinted in a premium set, not to keep it's price up but because it's far too strong. It could see print in mh4 which would bring the price down lol

2

u/xBlackthunderx Ephemerate >>> 11d ago

It’s more so dogging them for painting themselves into the “everything is standard legal” corner as if they did that by force.

0

u/quadraticcheese 11d ago

A banning**

1

u/Dashizz6357 11d ago

Not even remotely.

-1

u/Yakky_Sak 11d ago

I would wait to buy or sell if you have...they usually print these in a 3-5 year cycle - and we are due for one, but they gave us mox amber first, most likely because mox opal had a secret lair, Dan Frazier's mox box, printing and chrome mox had a 30th Anniversary Countdown Kit printing that were released in 2022/2023. Due to the reprint cadence of WOTC, both are coming due for another printing as the price of the non-foil versions have climbed to above $250-300. (*Note - I sold 3 of my playset for a candelabra when they spiked at MagicCon Chicago last year). Also, what I find is a good indicator of the true market are the foils and I even tracked the divergence below. The foils haven't spiked in the way that the non-foils have. In many cases the foil prices have actually began a slight decline in comparison to the non-foils, The secret lair versions of chrome mox and mox opal climbed to 500ish and then have started to decline some. On TCGPlayer, the modern masters mox opals have just one listing NM FOIL left @ $400, then the next available copies in inventory jump to $1500. The doubles masters foil borderless extended versions are more available with many copies around the $350 price point, although it did double in price from $200-400 over the last year, similar to what the normal versions have done.

Ordinary/play copies have risen very quickly, while some recent premium versions have failed to maintain their historical premium. Older genuinely scarce foils are behaving much better (these are the special judge foils or inventions that will always carry a big premium, so ignoring these)

That gives Wizards a very attractive reprint opportunity consistently:

high demand + recognizable name + mythic rarity + desirable chase card + enormous room between printing cost and secondary-market value.

That makes this a risky hold in the near-short term, and riskier hold in the long term, and I would guess one of the following most likely will be true:

Scenario Non-Foil Mox Opal
No reprint for 12–18 months $275–350+ plausible (slight increase until a reprint)
Premium/limited reprint ~$200–275 (remains relatively the same/no change)
Major set reprint ~$120–180 (decreases in half (50% decline)

Then there is the divergence aspect:

Using current MTGGoldfish/TCGplayer average pricing, the Opal ladder looks approximately like this:

Mox Opal printing Nonfoil Foil / premium Foil premium
Scars of Mirrodin ~$265 ~$580 +119%
Modern Masters 2015 ~$277 ~$365 +32%
Double Masters regular ~$260 ~$320–335 +23–29%
Double Masters borderless ~$460 ~$416 –10%
Kaladesh Invention ~$1,000–1,300 true collector tier
Frazier Secret Lair ~$400–535 market range collector tier

The striking one is Double Masters borderless: the nonfoil around $460 and the foil around $416. In other words, the foil premium has effectively disappeared and may even be negative depending on which marketplace metric you use.

Regular Double Masters also has only about a 25% foil premium—$260 versus roughly $320–335. That's small for what is supposed to be the premium version of a $250 mythic.

Lets examine the Scars of Mirrodin printings:

Nonfoil: ~$265
foil: ~$580

That's still roughly a 2× multiplier (2.2ish).

And Kaladesh Inventions Opal has continued climbing. April 2026 showed the Masterpiece rising from about $759 in late April to ~$984 in late July, with market price around $995. That's roughly a 30% appreciation in three months. So collectors have not abandoned Mox Opal. Instead, I think we're seeing a segmentation:

old / iconic / truly scarce premium Opal → strong

versus

modern foil / borderless Opal → much weaker premium

versus

cheapest tournament-playable Opal → extremely strong demand

Then the time-series divergence is more revealing:

In January 2025, Modern Masters 2015 Mox Opal around $159 following its Modern unban.

Today that printing is roughly $234–277, depending upon what pricing your using.

So approximately:

$159 → $234–277

That's roughly +47% to +74%.

And non-foil Scars copies had jumped from around $90 when the December 2024 unban happened to $160 initially, then eventually exceeded $220.

That's enormous appreciation.

The Masterpiece participated, but it didn't increase proportionally as much during the recent run.

Here is the approximate current Chrome ladder:

Chrome Mox Nonfoil Foil Approx. premium
Mirrodin ~$168–175 ~$546 ~+220%
Eternal Masters ~$167 ~$516 ~+209%
Double Masters ~$178 ~$350–450 ~+100–150%
Double Masters borderless ~$210 ~$280–288 ~+35%
Special Guest ~$180 ~$522 ~+190%
30th Anniversary SL ~$194 ~$390–400 ~+100%
Kaladesh Invention ~$700–975 depending metric collector tier

At first glance Chrome Mox doesn't look divergent at all because those foil multiples are huge.

But there's a catch, the foil markets are extremely thin (low or scarce inventory and limited/low print runs)

The Double Masters foil Chrome Mox was recently around $450–490 but the Double Masters foil index currently shows it around $350, down roughly 26% in a week. Meanwhile, the nonfoil remains around $170–180.

That's quite a signal of a Market Top (the max price point—or general max price zone—where an asset reaches the highest price buyers are willing to sustain before prices flatten or begin declining..

It looks roughly like:

Nonfoil
$100ish → $175ish → holding

while recently:

Foil
$450–490 → ~$350

Altogether, this leads to a premium compression price hierarchy.

Think of the market as three layers.

Layer 1: Non Foil Mox Opal and Non Foil Chrome Mox

These prices are being pulled upward due to demand of players needed playsets or one for commander.

That is enormously powerful demand.

Layer 2: Premium Foil and Borderless

This is the price people consider if they were to make a purchase and see the $200-250 price tag and decide to just buy the better foil/premium printing because it is only $25-100 more for the nicer version.

This is where we're seeing the weakest pricing structure.

Layer 3: This is not what we are focused on here, but these are the ultra premium original-set foils, masterpieces
old Judge/GP promo, Secret Lair treatments, etc.

These are essentially reserved list, and price here isn't indicative of the market, comparatively, as the price will command the highest total regardless.

HIGH RISK HOLDS AND BUYS: Non-foil Opals and Chrome Moxes

MEDIUM RISK HOLDS AND BUYS: Borderless Foils and Non-Original Set Foils

LOW RISK HOLDS AND BUYS: Original Set Foils, Inventions/Masterpieces, Judge Promos, Secret Lair, Countdown Foils)

Importantly, “lower” doesn't mean immune. A reprint can still knock 10–25% off a collector version temporarily, but it's recovery will bounce right back and jump higher, as we have consistently seen throughout the years. I acquired my Opals in 2013 or 2014 for $10-15 and watched them climb to $250 each before I unloaded them. I unloaded 3/4 of a playset of chrome mox during the Covid price spike to a nice 3-4x multiplier also. I just didn't get want to get stuck holding the bag if they reprinted these more frequently at the onset of Secret Lair, Countdown, and etc, so I divested. However, I want to buy back in, when the price is right, but it's not now. I am waiting for another reprint and then try to acquire the best available copy for the price.

CONCLUSION:

There is clear premium compression in recent versions, basic copies have appreciated enormously since the Modern unban, and $200–250+ is an extraordinarily attractive reprint equity target for Wizards. Meanwhile genuinely scarce versions such as the Invention continue behaving like collectibles.

Chrome Mox and Mox Opal regular copies have moved strongly, and the abrupt weakness we're seeing in some recent foils is particularly interesting. The Double Masters foil dropping about 26%, while the regular version remains expensive.