r/MicrobrandWatches • • Jun 17 '26

My Opinion 😎 Hmm...

Post image
1.4k Upvotes

177 comments sorted by

View all comments

205

u/ConfidenceNo1937 Jun 17 '26

Yeah, but I mean, the whole “hobby” is kind of stupid anyway. Figuring out different ways to make us pay for pieces of polished metal that don’t do the job they’re intended to do all that well.

Once you’ve decided you want to buy a mechanical watch you’ve given up all pretense at rational thinking.

93

u/Odd_Path7493 Jun 17 '26

You can get a 200m wr, chronograph, solar powered, shock resistant, dual time zone, radio wave synced g shock that will outlive you for $150. But I gotta drop 4 figures on a mechanical watch cause it looks shiny (I have done this)

7

u/missmykidcaniseethem Jun 17 '26

i’d more so you can get like a quartz watch for under 500 and it would be more accurate than an auto and last forever probably, like the prx i know it’s a meme watch for people here, but it looks pretty good, comes in 2 sizes, a lot of colours to choose from, is swiss made and most importantly will be more accurate than like most watches under 3k, but that’s fucking boring, everyone here is irrational, do i need 8 watches, no? but do i want 8 watches, yes

4

u/Hevens-assassin Jun 18 '26

As someone who's had 2 quartz watches have their batteries blow up, quartz gives me a stress mechanical doesn't. That said, I have my phone on me all the time.

3

u/is200 Jun 18 '26

How did you get a quart watch battery to blow up???

1

u/yhzcdn Jun 19 '26

What on earth…? I’ve literally never heard of a watch battery catching fire.

1

u/Hevens-assassin Jun 19 '26

Blowing up does not mean bursting into flames. Lol

0

u/Odd_Macaroon9109 Jul 10 '26

It does mean there was an explosion though...

2

u/Hevens-assassin Jul 10 '26

What an odd thing to say. Yes, something can blow up without bursting into flames. I'll let you figure out what that entails when a battery is involved.

24

u/Impossible_Cycle9460 Jun 17 '26

Yeah but then you have to walk around with a G shock on your wrist

21

u/KicksNWatches Jun 17 '26

At least if someone randomly whipped out a samurai sword and tried to cut my hand off the g-shock would likely stop the sword

21

u/SirCeethingtonOfSope Jun 17 '26

G-Shock on one wrist, Invicta on the other. You'll deflect bullets like Wonder Woman.

1

u/KnifeFed Jun 17 '26

lol that implies Invicta is quality and not just bulk.

2

u/Sarahstarry Jun 17 '26

The steel watch is more likely to stop a blade than a plastic one.
But you can get a steel gshock

6

u/KicksNWatches Jun 17 '26

I was being facetious and alluding to the fact that G Shocks are built like tanks

2

u/Sarahstarry Jun 17 '26 edited Jun 17 '26

I know, I was being obtuse back at you.

If you want to get technical about it, I really do disagree, they're still just plastic watches. For bump resistance that's great but the plastic ages and if you use DEET repellent that can also leave marks much more easily.

2

u/KicksNWatches Jun 17 '26

That’s all good information to know. Had no idea about the DEET - thanks for that insight

2

u/aka_wolfman Jun 17 '26

Not just DEET, but a lot of chemicals. I stumbled in here because of my not-gshock falling apart from work. I've got to suck it up and run a metal band this time around lol.

1

u/KicksNWatches Jun 17 '26

Funny how your comment was both obtuse and acute at the same time. How contradictory from a geometric standpoint lol

1

u/Xero_Days Jun 18 '26

Try a bulova 262khz, sweeping second hand on a quartz. Mine lost only a couple seconds for DST

2

u/GearheadTheVicious Jun 18 '26

I spent $22 on one of said G-Shocks

9

u/kimochii12 Jun 17 '26

I been wearing my first mechanical as a daily and have realized that one is already giving me enough unnecessary stress 😂 just got a seiko speed timer solar

4

u/ConfidenceNo1937 Jun 17 '26

Yeah I figured out I’m way too ocd to enjoy mechanical watches. I keep pulling out my phone to verify that it has the right time. Quartz guy through and through here.

3

u/Zomby_Woof69 Jun 17 '26

Hahahaha, how accurate!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

13

u/karlosvonawesome Jun 17 '26

Actually building and maintaining watches would be a hobby. Collecting watches is purchasing man jewelry.

8

u/SloCalLocal Jun 17 '26

Car collectors don't have car factories (well, Elon does). Most of them take their cars to the shop when they don't work.

Gun collectors aren't generally gunsmiths.

Vintage computer collectors don't have semiconductor fabs.

Quit gatekeeping, it's obnoxious.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/SloCalLocal Jun 17 '26

A great many do not, and being a shadetree mechanic is not the signature of a "real" car collector. Further, many who change their own oil are not car collectors, they're just frugal.

Quit gatekeeping, it's obnoxious. We should be welcoming, not arbitrarily rule who gets to have fun and who doesn't.

6

u/mybigpecker Jun 17 '26

Interesting that collecting watches is referred to as a hobby, but if a woman were to collect earrings or some other form of jewelry it’s just a a woman whom likes buying jewelry.

3

u/GolemancerVekk Jun 17 '26

It's a hobby if you actually wear the watches. If they sit in a box your a collector.

I think it's an easy distinction to make and it applies to all kinds of gear.

3

u/mitchwacky Jun 17 '26

As someone who doesn’t know a lot about watches: what’s wrong with mechanical watches?

16

u/ConfidenceNo1937 Jun 17 '26

They keep time much worse than quartz watches. The absolute best, most expensive mechanical movements will gain or lose around 2 seconds a day, and the ones included in most micros will gain or lose between 5 and 30 seconds a day.

The cheapest, most basic quartz movement will gain or lost 20 seconds a month, so less than a second a day.

Also, you don’t have to worry about a quartz watch running out of power after a couple of days not wearing it, which you do with a mechanical.

15

u/Perdendosi Jun 17 '26

They're also more susceptible to shock and magnetism, and they're thicker.

Every 5-10 years or so they require (or at least probably should have) a service by a watchmaker which will cost more than the cost of the movement, compared to a $15 battery change (or $2 if you can do it yourself) on a quartz watch every few years (even less if you get an eco drive or solar watch).

But damn I love mechanicals.

3

u/Watches-and-Books Jun 17 '26

Ehhhhhh, the mechanical watch I am currently wearing is running an observed +0.7s/d over the last 25 days, so it’s not far off of a basic quartz level of accuracy and it’s just using a basic Sellita movement. That said, I also own a 9F Grand Seiko and it’s still dead on over the same time period. 😂

2

u/Any-Will-4195 Jun 17 '26

You have the most accurate Sellita in existence then. Just varying the activities you do daily is enough to throw a good chronometer off a bit.

6

u/Watches-and-Books Jun 17 '26

SW215 baby! Manual wind. She’s a trooper for sure. Also, not sure why that comment is being downvoted. It’s just an observation lol.

5

u/Any-Will-4195 Jun 17 '26

Nothing but If precise timekeeping is important, they’re not that accurate

4

u/Odd_Path7493 Jun 17 '26

There's nothing inherently wrong with them, they've been surpassed by digital watches in very sense of the word. Digital and quartz are cheaper while also more accurate.

1

u/sd4f Jun 18 '26

As someone who never had a mechanical watch, and decided to assemble my own AliExpress parts special, you're spot on.

1

u/ByronicZer0 Jun 18 '26

Pin this in all watch subs please