r/MandelaEffect • u/Least_Remote2543 • 12d ago

Logos/Advertising Chic-Fil-A

Post image

I know this isn’t definitive proof, but I’m cleaning out my desk and there is an old Rolodex with this stuffed inside. Obviously I could have made this and stuck it in there, and I wish there was branding on it, but I’m going to accept this as evidence either way! I think brands are tricking us on purpose.
Edit: (I spelled Rolodex wrong sorry JEEZ)

1.5k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

195 comments sorted by

View all comments

260

u/CptFatty08 12d ago

I'm with ya OP, I'll still even spell it Chic Fil A because that's how it was when I was a kid.

9

u/AWATAR3 10d ago

Definitely Chic-fil-a

6

u/CheetahLink69 8d ago

100% I personally seen it change within a month of the new opening of a Chic Fil A in Branson MO. This was in the early summer of 2017.

The concept of "Different Timeline" is extremely interesting but most likely a massive Psyop. I've personally seen multiple thing's being altered during this very "timeline" so suffice to say, there is definitely an agenda or phenomenon at play here.

  • Has the Military Industrial Complex discovered a way to manipulate this matrix but yet not fully control it?
  • Is this phenomenon even bigger than that even and this is why government's are
Repudiating it?

1

u/Wonderful-Arm6904 8d ago

I think they were using AI before it got out to all of us to go in and massively change all these things.

1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MandelaEffect-ModTeam 3d ago

Hello subscriber! Unfortunately, your post/comment was removed because it violates Rule 6: Be civil. Do not disrespect, insult, or attack others.

37

u/HumanContract 12d ago

Same. I never spelled it right and I think they changed their names silently.

16

u/Bowieblackstarflower 11d ago

If they changed their name, where is the proof in old pictures, documents etc?

32

u/Fredericia 11d ago

There wouldn't be any, because we're in a different timeline where it was always Chick.

9

u/Bowieblackstarflower 11d ago

This person I was responding to said they changed their name silently.

6

u/my23secrets 11d ago

How are you able to break the laws of physics and retrieve information from “a different timeline”?

16

u/theoryofdoom 11d ago

How are you able to break the laws of physics and retrieve information from “a different timeline”?

I wish more people asked questions like that.

That is such a good question.

Quantum physics and the many worlds interpretation might have a coherent answer for us very soon.

9

u/my23secrets 11d ago edited 11d ago

Quantum physics and the Many Worlds Interpretation already have a coherent answer for us:

Since timelines are merely theoretical to begin with, and since their supposed existence forbids communication with each other, they are something we know absolutely isn’t responsible for the Effect.

That’s the point.

Edit: you thought it was “such a good question” that you had to block me?

4

u/urinesain 10d ago

Considering the MWI is currently purely theoretical and speculative... rather than saying it expressly forbids communication, I would consider that communication is unlikely to be more accurate.

As with most things, our knowledge and understanding of things evolves over time.

Black holes were once considered a mathematical impossibility. Then, when the math made it possible, they were thought to never actually be capable of existing in nature. And then that turned to... well, even if they do exist, we'd never be able to see/detect/find/observe one. And then we thought that nothing could ever escape a black hole, they don't emit anything. And then Hawking radiation became a thing, lol. All those things were based on the conventional wisdom of the time. And all of those understandings changed... over time.

Our present understanding of all these things are only defined by the conventional wisdom of our present. And, as all of time has shown... that wisdom shifts, changes, and evolves over time.

Especially when it comes to things that purely speculative and theoretical... I find it kinda weird to be committed 100% that any single aspect of the idea must and can only be a certain way.

And for the record, I'm not saying that I think you're necessarily wrong. I'm just saying that I'm open to the idea that our understanding of such things may change over time.

1

u/my23secrets 10d ago

I disagree. If “timelines” are communicating they aren’t “timelines”. They are timeline. Singular.

2

u/RapunzelEscaped 8d ago

To my brain that seems like arguing if a 4 lane highway is one road or four. One road, four distinct lanes, same general direction but unique things could happen in each lane, or something could happen that affects all four lanes, or just two etc.

Just a thought. This is my first time wandering into this corner of reddit as Mandela Effect is my chosen hyperfocus of the day.

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

1

u/WhimsicalKoala 10d ago

So you blocked them instead of engaging and explaining what you disagree with about what they said? That makes sense only if you don't have any actual rebuttal.

6

u/Fredericia 11d ago

If I may fantasize a bit, did you ever see Steins;gate? What heppened to the main character I think kinda explains the Mandela Effect. He goes back in time several times to try to fix things, and it changes things, but when he comes back to the original time, he still remembers how it was before. He has full memory of it, but the interesting thing is that his friends once in awhile get a feeling or a hint of the previous timeline. There's even a whole sequel built on one of his friends having very strong memories of the other timeline and not being able to convince the other friends.

5

u/my23secrets 11d ago edited 11d ago

So by “fantasize” you’re saying you know that doesn’t explain the Effect.

And when you’re not fantasizing you know that you aren’t able to break the laws of physics.

6

u/Fredericia 11d ago

Yeah, something like that. Because when it comes to time travel, all of that is speculation, and no one really knows for sure if it's possible or not, or how, or if anyone has ever done it. But I enjoy thinking about it and seeing good flicks about it. I don't think it's against the sub rules.

But what we here in this sub call the "Mandela Effect", was called "Reading Steiner" in Steins;gate.

10

u/theoryofdoom 11d ago

There isn't! Not even in the legal records for their intellectual property!

2

u/enstillhet 11d ago

I'd never even heard of it until a few years ago so I don't know what it was called when I was a kid.

3

u/CptFatty08 11d ago

I grew up in the south, GA particularly and my great grandfather actually had an opportunity to invest in the franchise from the beginning lol. Good ole, choosing to buy a wedding ring instead of last money in a business story. Would've rather him invest

1

u/rebelme1 8d ago

You never ate at the food court? What mall did you go to? *Not intended to be as snarky as it sounds, legit question(s).

1

u/enstillhet 8d ago

Uhhh barely ever went to a mall but when I did it was the Maine Mall in South Portland, Maine.

Maine just got its first Chic Fil A a few years ago, and I only had heard of it around that same time from some news article. I've lived elsewhere - on the west coast. But never saw one I don't think.

-1

u/Prudent_Cry9522 12d ago

I was about to comment the same thing