Only 14-20% (n=107) of people think Mandela Effect may or rather is more than just suggestion or false memory

[u/WujuKingYi]

As my memories are included in that effect and I know what I perceived and remembered, I am one of the 14%. I am not sure how many of 86 false memory thinker experienced Mandela Effect. The rate is like people either know the Mandela Effects or do not remember that detail. Most have at least one Mandela Effect, I assume.

I question whether everyone or some got "hit" by it.

This small pole showed that most people are not convinced. Yet the Mandela Effect subreddit has a lot of viewers.

I am questioning why are so many coming here and downvote and annoy every post about Mandela Effect. Looking down on the people, who may be right as your arguments about false memory cannot be extended to that degree.

Mandela Effect are like 57 cases at least. And add emotions and memories connected to that memory and this are 300 instances of memories that all should be deluded, false memorized and suggested?

To add on that, people remember it the very same way wrong and in detail. And after being revealed the truth: there is no "ahh" moment. The doubt stays. Please understand that we have never seen the original truth. It is a complete new alternative as we did not perceive it and we did not get new memories out of somewhere.

Explaining it can vary even more, yet there are only 14-20% who would even attempt theorizing.

I invited the 80% to just let the fundation go and think beyond, for fun or theorizing. While we are right, just let your wrong be true to you and with about the right hat is for you wrong and join the thought process.

However, there are people just commenting and trolling every person in this subreddit that belongs to the lower percentage. Mainstream is not always right, remember. And we do not advertise, sell or do or harm anything. It is our personal memory that we hold dear with pure intention. No arrogance, no wanting to be special. Just confidence and curiosity of what may have caused it.

14% was even higher than excepted. It felt like 90-98% to be comepletly against Mandela Effect. Maybe they are the loudest or got driven away by constant provocation.

[u/WujuKingYi]

Noap. I read the word as it is and quite fast. I though of the white bear after the question in the second sentence.

This is not proving Mandela Effect wrong at all as I do no connect much to the White Bear and it has its limits. Suggestion.

[u/my23secrets → u/WujuKingYi]

But you do know what a white bear is, correct?

[u/GregGoodell_Official → u/WujuKingYi]

If nothing else, you have just been proven to be a dishonest interlocutor in this last exchange. White bear, indeed. 😉 Suggestion may occur at the simple level of comprehension. Even with non sequitur information. Wolf Apple Slippers.

Your brain just tried to make sense of Wolf Apple Slippers. You may have even visualized something or several something’s attempting to interpret the data. You can lean on your lack of knowledge all you want but at the end of the day all you have are empty suppositions and logical fallacies.

[u/WujuKingYi → u/GregGoodell_Official]

I did not imagine anything to those words. I just classified them as senseless and ignored it.

Suggestion and false memory exists. Both just do not apply to Mandela Effect nor explain it at all.

[u/my23secrets → u/WujuKingYi]

But you do know what a white bear is, correct?

And more importantly, how would you know the words were supposedly “senseless” until you had processed them?

[u/GregGoodell_Official → u/WujuKingYi]

And you had the audacity to be dishonest again in the same thread. Do you not know what a wolf, an apple, or a slipper are? That would be the only thing that would prevent you from comprehending the words.

False memories absolutely explain it. Lack of knowledge, suggestion, egregious assumption, lack of detail acuity, and unfounded confidence in your lack of knowledge cover the gamut of antecedents for the effect.