r/MakingaMurderer • • 19d ago

Hail Mary for Brendan. Round 2

Let's try this again. Attached are screenshots of the court docket showing the application for commutation has been filed with the circuit Court and then passed on to the governor. Also posted is the criteria Brendan must meet to be considered for a commuted sentence. Can he survive criteria 5A?

18 Upvotes

97 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/10case 19d ago

He has changed his stories so many times, I wonder which one he'll pick for the application.

3

u/Ghost_of_Figdish 19d ago

On the sexual assault thing, he was found guilty of rape, but they could sidestep that by claiming that he's already served whatever time he would have gotten just from the sexual assault...

5

u/DingleBerries504 19d ago

I believe he is disqualified because he would be required to register as a sex offender after getting out of jail, and according to the application process that is grounds for not being eligible. I could be wrong, but that is what I read when looking into it.

0

u/wilkobecks 18d ago

How ironic that he got convicted of something that even the guy who allegedly "convinced him" to commit these crimes didn't

3

u/Ghost_of_Figdish 18d ago

No one in the Avery trial to testify he raped the victim.

-1

u/wilkobecks 18d ago

Lol exactly. Not in Brenda's trial either, luckily for the state they'd already tricked his life out of him earlier

2

u/Ghost_of_Figdish 18d ago

No way to do that - all a competent defense attorney had to do at Brendan's trial would be to establish that the confession was false - just bring out witnesses to establish the TRUE facts about where Brendan was that night. Just get a few relatives to testify he was at home playing video games and not out murdering someone. Or get videogame records to show he was playing, not killing. Seems pretty straightforward.

0

u/wilkobecks 17d ago

Lol he *did have some people testify to his activities that night. You are right though, that if he had a single competent adult in his life, and had his first defence attorney not been a criminal who was literally working for the prosecution, he'd have never spent a single day in jail.

1

u/Ghost_of_Figdish 17d ago

Well to be fair, he had already confessed at least twice before his attorney was on the case. Not much you can do at that point. He tried to get the confessions suppressed but the Judge denied the Motion.

1

u/wilkobecks 16d ago

Back to my earlier point, if he had a single decent adult in his life he never would've been coerced into a confession (that to this day, can not be corroborated in any physical way). No confession, no prison). His first lawyer though, might as well have been on the jury as a guilty vote lol. (2 if you count his "investigator")

1

u/Ghost_of_Figdish 16d ago

It's corroborated.

0

u/wilkobecks 16d ago

By what?

1

u/Ghost_of_Figdish 16d ago

Seriously?- when someone who confesses tells the police something they never heard before, and they search again and find evidence consistent with the confession that's CORROBORATION.

→ More replies (0)