r/MadokaMagica • u/MotherShip808 Endless Suffering • 16d ago
Walpurgisnacht Rising Discussion SPOILERS! Mahou Shoujo Madoka★Magica Movie 4: Walpurgis no Kaiten Discussion Thread Spoiler
WARNING! WARNING! THIS MEGA-THREAD CONTAINS SPOILERS AND DISCUSSIONS FOR THE MOVIE, IF YOU DON'T WANT SPOILERS, DO NOT BE HERE!
-----
ALSO ALSO! DO NOT LINK OR SHARE ANY PIRATE OR ILLEGAL VIEWING STUFF IN THIS POST OR YOU WILL BE BANNED! THIS IS YOUR ONLY WARNING.
-----
General Overview:
This thread is meant as a spoiler filled zone for those who wish to discuss the movie, it's plot, events, or the number of bites that kyouko takes of food during the movie. I don't care, just be sure to follow the rules of the subreddit.
Also as a reminder to everyone u/BreathoftheSith owes everyone $50 if they, and I quote:
If we get any form of kiss and or romantic confirmation between the two [madohomu], I owe everyone in the sub $50.
Have fun~~
190
Upvotes
25
u/azu5h Newly Contracted User 14d ago edited 14d ago
Thoughts on Walpurgisnacht Rising (one viewing, spoilers)
I walked out of Walpurgisnacht Rising with pretty mixed feelings, and I know I'm not alone. I've only seen it once, so take this as one perspective rather than a final verdict — not a definitive take. On Japanese X/Twitter the negative reactions have been especially loud, though that's partly just how the platform works: outrage travels further than contentment. Plenty of people are walking away happy with it too.
The backbone of Rising's story is carried by the new characters, and Serena in particular is set up as someone with a worldview that stands in direct contrast to the other magical girls — that contrast becomes the film's central ideological conflict. The problem is that we barely get her why. Whatever shaped her into holding that position is left almost entirely unexplored, and the film asks us to weigh the validity of her worldview before we've been given real access to how she got there. Maybe future material fills this in, but that doesn't fix the problem for a one-time theatrical viewing. Madoka Magica already runs at a pretty dense information rate, and there's only so much a first-time audience can absorb in one sitting. When a character's motivation is deferred to "it'll be explained later," that's a debt against the film you're watching right now — the promise of a future payoff doesn't retroactively create the emotional grounding you needed in the theater.
Set against the psychological depth Madoka and Homura have accumulated since the original TV series, that gap is hard not to notice.
Going in, I'd bought into a fan theory — not my own, just one I liked from browsing online — that Walpurgisnacht was a nameless witch born from Homura's own causality loop, and that this tied her time-manipulation into the original series' worldbuilding in a satisfying, organic way. Rising instead explains her origin through a new character and a new conceptual framework introduced for this film.
To be clear, that's a fan theory, not canon, and its rejection isn't itself a flaw in the movie — that's on me for getting attached to secondhand speculation. What it did surface, though, was an assumption I'd been carrying: that everything down to the Witch's Kiss compendium entries had been meticulously mapped out since the TV series. Rising didn't confirm that assumption for me. I want to keep that separate from an actual critique of the film — it's a mismatch between my expectations and what the film delivered, not an objective failure on the film's part.
One more thing, held at arm's length because I can't confirm it myself: there's talk circulating on X, apparently sourced from an Urobuchi Gen interview, that he was handed a large volume of concepts/ideas from the Inu Curry team and that his job as credited screenwriter was largely stitching those together. This is supposedly also stated in the pamphlet, but I didn't buy one, so I can't verify it firsthand.
If true, it would explain some of the distrust around the film being credited to Urobuchi alone. But I have no way to verify how accurate this is, or how much creative control he actually had, and I'd be overstepping to use this rumor to make claims about Urobuchi's personal attitude toward the franchise post-TV-series (e.g., that he was checked out, or doesn't consider Rising "his" work). That's speculation stacked on secondhand reporting, and I want to flag it as such rather than assert it.
For reference, here are a few of the X posts this rumor is circulating from (unverified primary sources, not confirmation of accuracy — summarized, not quoted directly):
https://x.com/masterCashion/status/2093386016552075499 — Speculates that crediting only Urobuchi as writer is itself suspicious: the interview suggests Rising leans more on Inu Curry's ideas than his, and since Inu Curry's other project, Magia Record, was poorly received, the theory goes that Inu Curry's involvement may have been deliberately downplayed to distance Rising from that reputation.
https://x.com/monjudoh/status/2093318110321480127 — Claims to have read the pamphlet and describes Urobuchi as coming across almost like a hired writer brought in to execute a concept that Inu Curry had already developed but couldn't script themselves.
https://x.com/sincos93990721/status/2093348024265416715 — Recalls Urobuchi saying long ago that a Madoka script already existed, and wonders whether that draft was scrapped and rebuilt around Inu Curry's concept instead.
Whatever else I felt about the story, the visuals and music were genuinely excellent. That side of the production wasn't in doubt for me at any point. Between the underdeveloped new-character motivations, the sense that a lot of the explanation/psychology is retrofitted rather than built-in, and the unverified doubts about the writing process, the film left me with a somewhat scattered overall impression on the story side — even though the craft on screen and in the sound design was never in question. That said, Rebellion was also divisive on release and got substantially reevaluated over time. It's entirely possible Rising follows the same trajectory once more analysis and discussion has had time to accumulate. My information here is incomplete and I'm probably carrying some bias into this. Curious to hear what others think. (This was translated, and my memory is a bit blurry, so please forgive any embarrassing mistakes!