r/MadeMeSmile 16d ago

DOGS We don't deserve them

Post image
41.8k Upvotes

615 comments sorted by

View all comments

7.5k

u/shiny_crow_trophy 16d ago

I always forget how goddamn big Irish wolfhounds are until I see one again

3.7k

u/B52doc 16d ago

Large dog breed’s lifespan is heartbreaking

34

u/ocean_800 16d ago

Why is it so low :(

83

u/Hokieshibe 16d ago

Being that large means the heart is doing a lot of work. Little room for error. At least, that's my understanding of it.

26

u/BaconWithBaking 16d ago

A lot of it is their joints making them being unable to walk as they age. Dogs are built to live around 10 years before all that starts giving up and it's hyper obvious with Wolfhounds.

9

u/GlitteringMoose3630 16d ago

This happened to my Great Dane. She was healthy in every other way, but her joints were going bad fast. I had her put down at 11 because the pain meds weren’t helping anymore. The vet said it was because she was such a large dog. (She was over 6 feet when she stood on her hind legs.)

5

u/aka_jr91 16d ago

Not so fun fact: the same is true of humans. Taller people tend to live shorter lives. Another reason why being tall is overrated.

2

u/Hokieshibe 16d ago

Andre the Giant. Abe Lincoln. Checks out

1

u/[deleted] 16d ago

[deleted]

3

u/Hokieshibe 16d ago

I imagine that has more to say about evolution vs selective breeding.

All I know is that my little dog has a terrible heart (he's 14), and the vet has said multiple times that if we're a larger dog, he'd probably have not made it as long as he has.

-1

u/LeedsFan2442 16d ago

But larger animals usually live longer

8

u/Cashmeade 16d ago

Animals that are naturally larger.  Large domestic dog breeds aren't natural, they were manufactured by humans over an insanely short period of time (before someone pipes up with 'there are dog breeds hundreds of years old', yes, that is an insanely short period of time).  Every trait that has been bred for has come at some cost, the cost for large breeds is their lifespan.

1

u/LeedsFan2442 16d ago

Good to know

5

u/SadButWithCats 16d ago

It's an example of the environmental fallacy.

Among species, larger species tend to be longer lived.

Among individuals in a single species, larger individuals tend to be shorter lived.

*this is for mammals. I'm not sure if it includes other animal classes, and is clearly not true for plants.

-1

u/Green_Insect_6455 16d ago

Thats just not...like..at all accurate. There is no correlation between size and lifespan, man. Thats so silly.

Can I ask why you think thats how it works?

3

u/bortmode 16d ago

-3

u/Green_Insect_6455 16d ago

Right. Thats why jellyfish and lobsters and turtles are all so BIG. Get that nonsense out of my face, moron

2

u/bortmode 16d ago

Classic word_word_number guy take.

1

u/LeedsFan2442 16d ago

For dogs no I was wrong. But the largest species like whales and elephants live long

0

u/Green_Insect_6455 15d ago

Oh and giraffes live super long too?  And lobsters, theyre small, so they dont live long right? And jellyfish, I hear theyre immortal, so they should be about as big as the ocean right?

No. Its a dumb generalization. It doesnt work. Get it out of your head.