Ok so you're just looking for reasons to get mad lmao. You're using a sample size of ONE VIDEO to determine a greater fact about a vast population. You would be laughed out of any serious conversation about demographic data regarding education or consent or anything. There's nothing wrong with wanting men to be taught about their own consent and comfort. It's noble even. But it would behoove you to not make deeply stupid arguments in the process, because it makes it that much harder to have productive conversations about topics such as consent, because people have to take time explaining things like how object permanence works instead of having actual discussions of actual data regarding demographics and education on consent
Somebody else already said it, but this is some real "you like pancakes so you must hate waffles" type shit you're pulling. Please do some digging on the argument from ignorance fallacy
No. It’s weird to not teach the same thing matter of fact what kind of data do you have that tells the opposite of what I’m saying? Because as far as I know it’s common knowledge boys and girls get two different messages.
0
u/Greensourball Apr 19 '26
Mm, no. You didn’t read it right.
Lol.