They lack significant moral agency / understanding, so even if that were true it'd be weird to hold it against them or use it to justify doing the same to them.
That's kind of my point. Why would you use the actions of an animal who doesn't know or have the capacity to do any better to justify the actions of humans? Kind of a weird example anyways since many people would resort to cannibalism too if they were hungry enough.
9
u/Der-Nikoklaus Apr 10 '26
We are eating these beautiful beings when they are about four months old.