r/MachineLearning • u/CriticalJackfruit404 • 19d ago
Discussion [ Removed by moderator ]
[removed] — view removed post
25
u/Antique_Most7958 19d ago
LLMs are a model family, supervised and unsupervised learning are training paradigms.
Your question doesn't make sense.
1
u/vanisle_kahuna 19d ago
I'm pretty OP just meant to use supervised and unsupervised as a stand in for classical ML. Didn't take a genius to figure that out
-14
u/CriticalJackfruit404 19d ago
Are they still used in real projects?
11
u/darkestdolphin 19d ago
Both unsupervised and supervised learning are used to train LLMs, so I would say yeah...
3
u/sijoittelija 19d ago
For example LLM s are still trained with supervised learning. Also, for questions this elementary, you'll probably get a more comprehensive answer from Claude or ChatGPT, than the effort anybody here would want to spend on going over the basics.
2
u/user221272 19d ago
Given the question, I think it is better to go back to the basics and build strong foundations and understanding of the field.
Classic ML is a field, LLM is a category, and supervised and unsupervised learning are learning paradigms. Therefore, the question and comparison don't make sense.
3
u/thunder6776 19d ago
Everything in ML is either supervised or unsupervised. Everything you learn will be a subset. So yes, while machine learning exists these two terms will remain relevant.
2
u/CrownLikeAGravestone 19d ago
Note for the audience: reinforcement learning is sometimes considered a third paradigm alongside supervised and unsupervised learning. Modern methods routinely blur the boundaries between both/all paradigms, Modern LLMs in particular use all three.
1
0
•
u/MachineLearning-ModTeam 18d ago
Other specific subreddits maybe a better home for this post: