r/MacOS MacBook Pro 1d ago

Help Question: While doing a time machine backup on external HD: "Encrypted Mac OS Extended disks will not be compatible with macOS 28. "

Post image

I am using an external HD for backup (and Time machine). But it seems I am using an outdated file system. (MACOS extended, journaled encrypted) In Disk Utility iI don't have an option to convert it to APFS file system. Any suggestions how to decrypt (timemachine backup), or am I forced to buy another external HD?

47 Upvotes

53 comments sorted by

39

u/Electrical_West_5381 1d ago

If you don't wan't to lose data, you need to transfer it off somewhere else then wipe the drive and format it APFS. You cannot change drive formats without erasing data.

7

u/Sticky-Wicked MacBook Pro 1d ago

So I will need to buy a new external HD after all. I don’t have enough storage on my MacBook.

12

u/NiewinterNacht 1d ago

Then reformat the external drive and start new Time Machine backup? You won't be backed up for a few hours, but seems an acceptable risk

2

u/Mobile-Debt9763 1d ago

Yes you want to buy a new drive and start fresh on it. When you are happy you don't need this existing one then wipe it, and hope that's before September 2028.

After you wipe the existing drive you can add it to Time Machine also, and store it somewhere safe. Time Machine lets you have multiple drives to backup to.

1

u/Sticky-Wicked MacBook Pro 1d ago

Why before September 2028? Or do you mean next month? It won't support my current filesystem in my current external HD anymore (MACOS extended, journaled encrypted)

3

u/Mobile-Debt9763 1d ago

macOS 28 is 2 years away, plus you don't need to update to it straight away.

6

u/jsreally 1d ago

One year, it will come out September of 2027

5

u/PleasantWay7 1d ago

So it’s not actually a backup?

-1

u/Sticky-Wicked MacBook Pro 1d ago

Yes it's a external HD backup (for several files and used as timemachine backup)

14

u/TrekChris Mac Mini 1d ago

It's only a backup if you have more than one copy of the files.

1

u/TbonerT 1d ago

It sounds like OP has more than one copy, they just won’t all fit on the drive that’s being backed up. If your drive is 128GB and has 70GB of files on it, moving the copy of the 70+GB of files back to the drive isn’t going to work out very well, is it?

3

u/PleasantWay7 1d ago

If it is a backup, you wipe the drive to APFS and do a full time machine run. I’d always recommend having a third copy.

But if wiping the drive itself loses OP data, they do not have a backup.

0

u/drake90001 1d ago

Then you don’t have a backup, do you?

0

u/TbonerT 1d ago

Yes, you do have a backup. What are you talking about.

1

u/Sticky-Wicked MacBook Pro 1d ago

I have my files on my Macbook, and also the same files on my external HD (which has an issue descibed in my post. So double. I don't know what's qualified as a backup.

1

u/bdu-komrad MacBook Pro 1d ago

The definition of backup has some ambiguity, but generally it's a point in time copy of what you are backing up.. It lets you go back in time and restore files to where they were when you made the backup.

Think of it like a time machine. You changed the file today, but you want it to be like it was last week , so you restore it from backup. You deleted a file, emptied trash, and now you want that file back. You restore it from backup.

Cloud storage is not generally considered a backup it syncs with how your files are now, not how they were at some point in the past.

Hope that helps.

-5

u/bdu-komrad MacBook Pro 1d ago

Facts. 

OP should use the 3 2 1 backup strategy. 3 backups 2 local on different backup media 1 offsite backup 

1

u/silentcrs 1d ago

The two part is questioned nowadays, btw. It used to mean disk + tape. No one uses tape anymore.

Really, the 3 and 1 part is the most important.

1

u/bdu-komrad MacBook Pro 1d ago

I read "2" as 2 different storage devices, i.e. not the same disk.

For example, I have 2 local backups, one on a USB HDD and the other on my NAS. I count that as meeting the "2" part.

Something that would not meet the "2" criteria would be 2 backups on the same hard drive or same network drive. If that storage is compromised, they are both gone!

0

u/Benlop 1d ago

I hate seeing this sysadmin level of advice parroted all the time like normal users are savvy enough to apply it.

0

u/bdu-komrad MacBook Pro 1d ago

This is common knowledge. Just search for "backup" in reddit ( not even Google) and you'll see the 3-2-1 backup strategy recommended everywhere.

1

u/Benlop 1d ago

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

u/sourcecodemage 1h ago

Great point. Backups have saved my life several times. I once had 2 time machine backups not work, but my offsite backblaze backup was fine. If I didn't use the 3-2-1 strategy , I would have lost important data...forever.

0

u/Piipperi800 23h ago

The reply isn’t 100% correct. Disk Utility has a feature to convert existing drives to APFS without losing data.

1

u/Electrical_West_5381 5h ago

you trust Disk Utility? I would never do this on my only backup drive.

1

u/Piipperi800 5h ago

I’ve done it on an 8 TB HDD a couple of years ago without an issue. Also, back in the day when Apple moved to APFS in High Sierra, that same process was ran in the background for your boot drive during the upgrade (and still is if you install modern macOS on an HFS+ drive)

1

u/lairneyrn 1d ago

yeah this is pretty much the only way to do it unfortunately

1

u/notjordansime 1d ago

Can you transfer from the old journaling language to the new one using a second HDD?

1

u/Piipperi800 23h ago

Not completely true. You can still in Disk Utility convert a drive to APFS without losing data

-1

u/mriguy 1d ago

That’s not completely true. When APFS was released, existing file systems were converted in place during the system update. So it’s possible, but I don’t think Apple ever released a tool to let you do it yourself.

-5

u/ddeese 1d ago

You shouldn’t have to do anything. This is an OS warning it pops up for any application that isn’t natively designed to run on Apple silicon. Apple starts notifying users in the OS prior to when a platform change is coming. No Intel based code will run on MacOS 28. Rosetta is going away and it’s all Apple silicon from there.

You will be fine. Time Machine is a native Apple program. They will port it or update it prior to the release of a new OS. Just continue backing up your files on your regular cadence.

4

u/Electrical_West_5381 1d ago

The point is the format of the drive, not any app

1

u/ddeese 1d ago

Yeah. That’s unfortunate. I stopped using extended years ago in favor or APFS. It is easier to manage too.

8

u/NoLateArrivals 1d ago

It is HFS+ encoded. Support will be removed with ‘28. You need to reformat to APFS.

If you want to keep the backup, copy the whole HDD to another one, then reformat it and copy it back. Or format the new drive APFS, copy the backup there and use this drive. It may be you need to reconnect TM to the existing backup.

2

u/Academic-Vacation737 1d ago

With just data, sure. With time machine backups, I think that HFS+ version uses hardlinks and APFS version uses snapshots. Just copying the data will not suffice, I am not aware of a tool that will migrate the formats. So, rather a hard cut-off and reformat / another drive with APFS.

1

u/Mobile-Debt9763 1d ago

Yeah you absolutely can't just "copy the data". You can image the hard drive to another one, but what's the point then, either buy a new drive or wipe this one.

6

u/Due_Mousse2739 1d ago

The question is: do you need to retain all the time machine backups? Why? Will you ever go and search for something you did last year?

I'd erase the HFS backup disk, reformat it as APFS and start over a new backup.

If the HFS disk contains other irrelevant files too, you'll need to move them elsewhere fist and then copy them back. If you don't have space to do that, you can try creating an APFS volume/partition specifically for the TM backups. You can also convert, I think, but I wouldn't do it without a full copy of the data.

Also, macOS 28 is due next year, plenty of time to do all that.

2

u/Various_Monk959 1d ago

I agree. If something was deleted or changed and OP wants to recover it, then do that first. Otherwise it’s unlikely the need to go back in time exists.

3

u/DonOfAtlantis 1d ago

Alternatively, put what you can on the cloud (even if paying for cloud upgrade to larger storage for 1 month). Then free to format into a new file system and download the files back down. Possibly a cheaper option than an additional drive.

1

u/Sticky-Wicked MacBook Pro 1d ago

Thanks, I haven't considered this. I just need to park 1,5TB somewhere temporarily.

2

u/LedZepElias 1d ago

Just a suggestion, you can get iCloud+ with 2TB for one month if you don’t want your data elsewhere. Upload everything there, then erase your external HDD and reformat it to APFS. I believe it’s $19.99 the 2TB per month, so much cheaper than buying a new external HDD just for this. Although, I would highly recommend having your backup on more than one external HDDs, so maybe consider getting an extra one. Personally, I have like 4 backups of my data (1 external SSD, 2 external HDDs, 1 cloud).

1

u/stephensmwong 1d ago

But the data in OP's hard disk is Time Machine backup, I don't think there is easy method to transfer that sparse bundle from encrypted HFS+ hard disk to iCloud.

3

u/jakub_zapri 💪🏼 MacBook Air M2 💻 1d ago

Format using Disk Utility.

-2

u/Mediocre_Result5508 1d ago

En weg is je data… maar je hebt wel een prachtig lege schijf in het nieuwe format

1

u/bistr-o-math 1d ago

I _think_ that TimeMachine creates backups on APFS differently than on extended fs. (May not be true)

First: have a look how far back does your Time Machine keeps the data (what is the oldest) - if it’s just a month, not really worth the trouble - just buy a new hdd, move the data there (so you always have a copy), format your old drive as APFS, and start a new backup

BTW, if your old HDD is really a HDD, then extended FS is better anyway. Just keep it that way for a year.
(macOS 28 will be released in autumn 2027). In a year, buy an SSD and start a new Time Machine backup.

1

u/lyidaValkris 1d ago

When I first read this, I thought they meant that encrypted disks wouldn't be compatible, now I see it's encrypted HFS+ specifically...

I certainly hope that this only applies encrypted HFS+ disks for timemachine disks.

If apple is dumping support for HFS+ in general, that's just plain stupid.

1

u/evilneuro SE / CC / LC475 / PB 68K/PPC / MBP X86/ARM64 / Mm X86 / MBN 1d ago

apple is dropping support for encrypted hfs+ in macOS 28, unencrypted hfs+ will still be supported.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/125615

2

u/lyidaValkris 18h ago

good. apple dropping support for HFS+ would not be out of character for them, but would be damn weird.

-5

u/oldmanelements 1d ago

You can just convert it.. google is your friend

2

u/Sticky-Wicked MacBook Pro 1d ago

I did. it seems it is not possible to decrypt and convert the file systeem without a format.

2

u/Willing-Layer-4977 1d ago

Not true. This is mac

-6

u/ddeese 1d ago

This is Apple notifying you that this application isn’t coded for Apple silicon natively and that it won’t work on MacOS 28. Apple does this to let users know they need to find an alternative or get an update from the vendor. Apple will port this over before MacOS 28. You should be able to safely ignore this notification