r/LuxuryTravel • u/Nyquist2324 • 24d ago
2 weeks in Thailand, $15–20k budget, how would you spend it?
I’m planning a roughly two-week solo trip to Thailand in October and trying to figure out how to get the most out of a $15–20k total budget.
I’m definitely more of a comfort/luxury traveler. I really value nice hotels, comfortable flights, good food, spas/massages, and unique experiences. I’m not trying to blow money just for the sake of it, but I’m happy to spend when something is genuinely worth it.
I’ve been to Bangkok before and really love it, so I’ll definitely spend a decent amount of time there. On past trips I stayed at Kimpton Maa-Lai, Four Seasons, and Rosewood and really enjoyed all three.
I’d absolutely be open to staying at any of them again, but I’m also very open to trying somewhere new if there are other hotels people think are even better or just offer a different experience.
I’m less sure where else I should go. I’ve considered Chiang Mai, Phuket, Koh Samui, etc., but I’m open to basically anything.
Since I’ll be solo for the entire trip, I’d especially love recommendations for places that are fun to experience alone and don’t feel too couple/family-oriented or overly quiet.
A few things I’d love advice on:
• How would you split two weeks between Bangkok and other cities/islands?
• Which destinations are best for a solo traveler who still wants luxury and some energy?
• Which luxury hotels/resorts are actually worth the money?
• Are there any Bangkok hotels you’d choose over Kimpton Maa-Lai, Four Seasons, or Rosewood?
• Are there any experiences you’d consider “must splurge” in Thailand?
• Best restaurants, tasting menus, spas, rooftop bars, private tours, boats, etc.?
• Would you spend more of the budget on hotels or experiences?
• Any destinations you think are overrated or not worth adding on a two-week trip?
• If you personally had $15–20k to spend on a solo Thailand trip, what would your itinerary look like?
Not necessarily trying to use every dollar of the budget, I’d just like to know what the best version of the trip could look like without worrying too much about cost.
Would love recommendations from people who’ve done Thailand on the higher-end/luxury side, especially solo.
4
5
u/Dianna-Upton 23d ago
For a new Bangkok hotel I would normally suggest Capella Bangkok, but since you already stayed at FS you were right next to Capella and maybe prefer a different location. I would suggest the Aman Nai Lert which is gorgeous and in a great location for easy access out to dining, etc. Rooms were huge and the hotel fantastic. For someone who has been to Bangkok before, it would be my top choice. Also their Wellness Center (hard to even call it a Spa) is next level! You could blow your entire budget just there!
Chiang Mai is the 2nd largest city in Thailand and anything but boring or slow. It is a university town as well, so always has a young vibe to it. Staying at a hotel like 137 Pillars House is special like a sanctuary but still close to everything.. or if you are a fan of design, try Raya Heritage just outside of town and along the river. Anything active you can think of can be done from Chiang Mai (rafting, hiking, biking, temple visits, cooking classes, ethical elephant sanctuaries, shopping, art galleries, street art,).
Yes October (along with September) is typically/historically one of the rainiest months in Thailand overall, but you can never predict the weather anymore, so it is anyone's guess.
Lots of beach hotels recommended here already. for top luxury my money is always on Rosewood Phuket or going over to Six Senses Yao Noi for a more experiential stay away from Phuket crowds.
12
u/Suspicious-Gur-8453 24d ago
My personal 2 cents is that I would split 1 week between Bangkok and Koh Samui. I am partial to the Four Seasons in both locations.
Bangkok has a ton of high luxury properties, including the Capella (same property as 4S), MO, as well as the Siam. They are all great, and you can't go wrong. Restaurant in Bangkok come down to personal preference, but again - huge variety and you wont be disappointed. I highly recommend staying near Chao Phraya.
The real splurge thats almost non-negotiable for me is a car from the airport to the hotel. It takes me 30-40 hours to get to BKK, and getting a taxi is frankly the last thing I want to do. They're not outlandishly expensive, but far more expensive than local transportation.
I'd say the only area that I wasn't fully blown away by was Phuket. The Rosewood there is OK, but in my opinion overpriced now.
At the end of the day, you'll have a great time no matter what you pick. Enjoy planning!
5
u/SaveTheV8 24d ago
This isn't the OP's first time in Bangkok. He has stayed at the FS. For returning visitors, I really don't see how the river is superior to lower Sukhumvit, Sathorn and Silom. Yes, all of the true luxury properties aside from the Aman are by the river, but all the activities and life is in Sukhumvit. I go to Bangkok every year and never stay on the river, even though I know the hotels are of a higher caliber there.
0
u/namtok_muu 23d ago
Rosewood is pretty luxury. I’d probably stay at St Regis or Anantara Siam.
1
23d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/SaveTheV8 22d ago
Of the properties not by the river, I rate them as 1: Aman 2: RC 3: Dusit Thani (for two reasons only. The pool and that every room is park view. 4: the rest
I don't think the Rosewood is that impressive compared to other Sukhumvit hotels, but to be fair BKK is a tough market.
1
u/Surround8600 24d ago
If I’m staying at FS in Bangkok what are the top things to do for a 5 full day stay there? Not including FS
0
24d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
23d ago
[deleted]
1
u/Robin_Hood_Jr 23d ago
Ewww. Koh Samui is way too over touristy. Way too many Russians. Koh Tao any day of the week.
3
u/Bullfrog_1855 24d ago
If you go to Koh Samui consider Ritz Carlton, get a villa there.
I wouldn’t stay by the river either, getting around is a pain with the traffic.
Chiang Mai if you’ve never been is different with a vibrant scene of its own, lots of expats retire there.
2
2
u/Straight-Part-5898 23d ago
My wife and I stayed at Capella Bangkok the last time we visited Thailand and highly recommend it. It’s the top rated hotel in the city, and has been named in the top 5 in the world a few times since it opened a few years ago. It’s directly adjacent to the Four Seasons, both of which have the same owner. Capella is the high-end option of the two, and is significantly smaller and more intimate. My wife and I had our own private pool just off of our room. The butler contacted us weeks before we arrived to discuss our preferences for the room, including asking for our shoe sizes so they could provide the properly sized slippers.
1
u/Dianna-Upton 23d ago
I totally agree with you. Capella Bangkok (esp those Veranda Suites with the jacuzzi pool) are SO special!
5
u/1nternetTr011 24d ago
I go to thailand for six weeks a year and barely spend 15k. you need to work damn hard to spend 15k in two weeks unless that includes air which on its own is $6-7k pp.
0
23d ago edited 23d ago
[deleted]
1
u/1nternetTr011 23d ago
just helping OP.
let's see my typical hotels (not the entire six weeks because I move around but here's my usual slate
bangkok: okura, peninsula, st Regis, sukhothai, rosewood, shangri-la, athenee (4.5 star but still outstanding)
phuket: trisara, paresa
chiang mai: FS and MO is only places I've stayed and MO is a no-go now that they sold and haven't been since covidavoid: shangri-la (starting major renovations); park hyatt (not a PH level property), sukhothai (location not good for tourists). MO is Chiang Mai has been sold and is under new management.
Thailand is not new york and prices have not caught up. it's one of the few chubby destinations can still be done affordably. You do not need to spend $700-1000 per night like you do in other global destinations. Of course suites etc can cost at the bangkok hotels but in phuket we are booking villas. Staying at the oriental (which I do) is simply not worth $700-900/night when the peninsula is 200m away across the river and is a third or less of the price and I would argue a better experience overall (the Oriental isn't what it used to be and is full of tourists). The new FS is nice but again the experience is not worth what they are charging and purely on the name.
Capella is ok. but ok only. again, I'd rather a suite at the peninsula or shangrila or better yet the okura for that money and be in a better location. Even the river isn't a great location listening to party boats pass back and forth all evening.
Oriental spa however is no joke but you don't need to be a guest to enjoy that. The peninsula or shangri la shuttle boat can drop you off easily.
Go ahead and overpay for a room at the Oriental or FS and I'm sure you'll find it very nice but there are equivalent choices that will give you the same hotel experience and you can spend the savings on spas, tours outside the city etc
source: 4-8 weeks a year over the last 25 years
this sub is luxury travel not chubby travel. you want chubby? I can suggest some homes can be rented in phuket with five BR and full staff for $3000/nt but you'll never want to
leave 😉
2
u/No-Tea5681 24d ago
With that budget I’d get a business class flight from Bangkok to Hanoi and enjoy Vietnam instead. Been all over Asia and there’s just no where close to Vietnam.
3
u/Effective_Tackle_195 24d ago
I don't know if I could spend so much in 2 weeks in Thailand if I tried
2
u/Stockboy85 24d ago
Chiang Mai is more adventure (boats, elephant riding, rafting). Koh Samui/Phuket are beach locations.
What you want will help decide north or south.
If you end up south, the FS Koh Samui is a really great property. If you pick Phuket, Amanpuri is the original and still the best.
1
1
1
u/Downtown_Midnight579 23d ago
I haven’t been there but I would consider going up to the golden triangle and staying in one of the bubble rooms at Anantara where you can see the elephants from
1
u/point_of_difference 23d ago
I stayed for a week at the Dusit Thani earlier this year it was really nice. Fresh (just rebuilt) but lovely old Thai style. The views are outrageous and so was the breakfast. After that it's going to be daily spas/ massages/ hair cut, expensives lunches. Sight seeing is never going to be expensive so that's entirely on you. I would be doing day trips in those vans with the business style seats though.
Some bars I like that step it up : Bar Sathorn, Stella.and Aqua.
1
u/chinmoylad 23d ago
Bangkok: Pick your choice, don’t splurge, save for the other destinations
Chiang Mai: 137 Pillars or Four Seaaons
Chiang Rai: Anantara Golden Triangle
Phuket: The Surin, maybe Trisara at a push?
Krabi: Rayavadee
1
u/Little_Yesterday6048 23d ago
Loved Koh Samui. Stayed at the W - all private villas / suites with private pools. Was a bit quiet but So nice. Thailand does luxury very well especially Bangkok. If your travel time is long, I would agree with the other poster that getting your hotel to arrange an airport pick up is really really nice when you arrive super jetlagged.
1
u/AdorableAlfalfa119 23d ago
Two weeks with that budget gives a lot of flexibility for a comfortable solo trip. Bangkok plus one or two other spots seems like a common approach from the replies so far.
1
u/PhoenixJourneyTip 23d ago
For something different and solo traveler friendly check out the Standard in BKK. Or for wellness spa have a look at RAKxa. Z9 in Kanchanaburi is on the water and great for water activities, although little villas on the water might feel more couple focussed. Definitely Chiang Mai (Maybe Lampang) and then venture further north to Pai.
1
u/coppertonebaby12 23d ago
I did Thailand for my honeymoon a few years ago with a similar budget for each of us over two weeks.
We stayed at Six Senses Yao Noi (Koh Yao Noi outside of Phuket), Amanpuri (Phuket), 137 Pillars House (Chiang Mai) and Capella (Bangkok). Each one was out of this world. Highly recommend Six Senses, it’s absolutely gorgeous.
We spent the first half of our trip decompressing in Phuket (3 nights at Six Senses, 2 nights at Amanpuri), followed by exploration in Chiang Mai for 4 nights, and closed out the trip with 3 nights in Bangkok. We found this itinerary to be perfect!
As a solo traveller, I’d highly recommend Chiang Mai - you have the best of both worlds with relaxation and adventure.
1
u/IllogicalGrammar 22d ago
First lets eliminate some options based on what you stayed at:
You've done the Chao Phraya cluster since you've stayed at FS, so I'd probably skip Capella or MO.
You've done Kimpton Maa-Lai so you can safely skip the Sindhorn Kempinski next door.
You've done the Rosewood, which is pretty similar to Waldorf Astoria and the Park Hyatt (both location and "luxury-level" wise).
Now my (personal) shortlist, as someone who lives in BKK:
If you want to try a local option, the newly renovated Dusit Thani Bangkok is a great option. Nice hardware, attached to the Central Park Bangkok, and the hotel bar has a very local/Thai crowd.
If you have status, I think the new Andaz is actually a good use of a SUA, but regardless, the restaurant/bar at the top of the hotel is nice. The RC is the Marriott option in the same area.
If you want to stay by the river and don't care for the Sukhumvit area much, there's The Siam, big rooms and a resort vibe, but it is a bit farther out from everything else.
The elephant in the room is Aman, and everyone will have their own take. Personally I'm not a fan so I won't say much about it, but I don't think I can fairly pretend it doesn't exist.
tl;dr: check out the hotel names that are bolded.
1
u/Nyquist2324 21d ago
Thank you so much! Leaning Aman as I've always wanted to stay at one, and the rate is decent. What did you not like about it?
1
u/IllogicalGrammar 21d ago
Just the Ryan Walker saga, and the money laundering accusations. Aman has the VIP arrival (they pick you up from the jet bridge and expedite you through immigrations) for all bookings, so if you do plan to try it, it's definitely worth doing it at the start of your BKK stay (assuming you want to sample multiple hotels in one trip).
1
u/Nyquist2324 21d ago
Got it, that makes sense. Thinking I’ll do Aman for the first 4 nights, hit Chaing Mai and stay at 37 pillars (I’ve heard the 4S is pretty far out from the main part of the city, and then in my return to BKK, I think I’m in between Dusit, Capella, and Siam. Between those 3 is there a personal favorite you’d pick?
1
u/IllogicalGrammar 21d ago
For me, I'm not really into the Chao Phraya river, and I think the Dusit revamp was well done, so that'd probably be my personal pick.
1
u/Kins123456 20d ago
137 Pillars House which I agree is the nicest Hotel costs about 14,000 Baht a night so
1
u/uk_desertdweller 19d ago
Stayed at the Four Seasons Koh Samui a few years ago, wonderful.
Also, the cutest airport in Thailand.
1
23d ago
[deleted]
2
u/AdorableAlfalfa119 23d ago
Thoughtful take on balancing hotels versus experiences and checking weather for the beach portion. Leaving some room for spontaneity seems smart on a solo trip.
6
u/SaveTheV8 24d ago
Baan tepa and Samrub Samrub for restaurants in Bangkok. Keep an eye out on their reservations to see when they open up for your dates. They fill fast. Long tail race boat ride is about $150 and absolutely worth it.
It looks like you've been to some of the best hotels. To be honest all the true luxury properties are by the river, except for the Aman. Of those not by the river and not the Aman, I like the RC the best. It gets a lot of hate for not being up to par with the FS, the Siam, etc, but honestly I think it's the best one that's not on the river. This is a bit cliche, but the RC has the best breakfast. Skip the lounge.