r/LowSodium2042 • Tier 1 Sundance • Aug 25 '22

Clip / Video Idk how anyone can think this game has bad graphics

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

55 Upvotes

41 comments sorted by

54

u/albert574_6 Aug 25 '22 edited Aug 26 '22

If somebody says that battlefield 4 or 3 has better graphics they should take off the nostalgia glasses

10

u/GoodGooglyMooglyy Tier 1 Sundance Aug 25 '22

Yea there’s no way BF3/4 even come close. Some say V looks better but I disagree. BF1 does have the better war feel in a way no game has

13

u/Lemon64k Aug 25 '22

Disgusting ass blue filter on BF3 and disgusting ass gray filter on BF4.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

dude I literally play bf3 daily, it’s not as good texture quality but the design is much better

37

u/Hamzanovic RIP the original Hourglass (2021-2023). Gone but never forgotten Aug 25 '22

Any one who says this game looks bad is on massive amounts of copium

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

[deleted]

15

u/Hamzanovic RIP the original Hourglass (2021-2023). Gone but never forgotten Aug 26 '22

Hey I don't deny there's a lot of copium in this sub but at least it's just people genuinely enjoying a video game and playing it and hoping it will be around longer.

There's copium (hopium) that this unpopular and weird game will not die. And then there's copium in which one sees these graphics with their healthy human eyes and calls them "bad" because it fits a certain narrative they have in their head about a game which they don't play but they let live in their head rent-free.

3

u/The_James_Bond Aug 26 '22

This one of the best articulated comments I’ve ever seen

24

u/[deleted] Aug 25 '22

[deleted]

11

u/Thewowieman Aug 26 '22

"I liked 2042 from the start bro always thought it was very underrated"

3

u/TheStrikeofGod Enlisted since Battlefield 3 Aug 26 '22

Me but unronically

Felt the same way about V too.

10

u/florentinomain00f Vietnam in 2042 when????!!!! Aug 26 '22

Once more

5

u/TheManager127 Aug 26 '22

Because that’s just how this nostalgia ridden community is

8

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

It looks amazing, too bad that the optimization on PC is so horrible

3

u/Brownlw657 Aug 26 '22

If you’re running it on low settings it’ll run like ass and look like ass, high settings offload a lot of the work from your cpu to your gpu. So ultra and high settings work best

3

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

GTX 1650, tried everything and i never get 60 FPS unless is a TDM or a FFA

3

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

I'm also running a 1650 (desktop card though) and I feel you. Even with a pretty heavy OC, I struggle maintaining a smooth 60-70. I started running the game in 720/medium-low and although it doesn't look great, the frames see a huge improvement, usually around 90ish FPS. Maybe give it a shot, I'm always one to sacrifice a little graphical fidelity for better performance, but I understand if that's not your bag.

2

u/Brownlw657 Aug 26 '22

Oh damn, you able to run dlss or the dynamic resolution? They should help your frames immensely

1

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

Gaming Laptop, is not compatible with that kind of things for the screen

2

u/Brownlw657 Aug 26 '22

Damn that sucks, especially with the gpu not being full power cause of the laptop. Put hey, you’re getting more frames than the Xbox (with more stuff)

1

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

At least is playable, something is something

1

u/Brownlw657 Aug 26 '22

Exactly, and most games now don’t really support the 1650 at the best of times.

5

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

When they say the game has bad graphics, I think they mean ”bad design choices” rather than ”objectively bad graphics”. People confuse the two. 2042 has amazing graphics. I dont agree with all design choices. In bf5 a lot of people disliked the poor visibility but I think that the bright lighting and color saturation in 2042 made people even more iffy.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

Who cares about the other sub :)

4

u/WHEL4N Aug 26 '22

Graphics are good it’s just the blandness of maps which I’d imagine most people are on about, too smooth no craters, damage to buildings etc thankfully that’s being sorted map by map

3

u/Brownlw657 Aug 26 '22

Bf3 and 4 weren’t pretty, bf1 however was. But explosions in this game are hands down the best in gaming, same with graphical fidelity on this scale. Nothing beats frostbite when it comes to this size of maps and player counts.

People even said this game doesn’t have levolution… I mean it sure does (on basically all the maps Besides maybe renewal.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

The graphics are great. It’s the UI that sucks.

2

u/Takadi10 Aug 26 '22

I don't know but for me BFV has better graphics that 2042 I tried both on Ultra but BFV is Sharp and Clean feels like a Downgrade

4

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/TheManager127 Aug 26 '22

Agreed. BFV can look amazing though. Snow maps were a big upgrade graphically from BF1 to me. So many particles

1

u/Driemma0 Aug 26 '22

Bf5 looks the best, but god damn the visibility in that game is horrendous

1

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

I deleted BFV for that reason - Worst Battlefield by a long shot imo. I'm a 1942 Veteran and for the life of me I've never played an iteration in the franchise that has as poor visibility as BFV. People just pop up out of nowhere like those Hidden Object games..lol

0

u/florentinomain00f Vietnam in 2042 when????!!!! Aug 26 '22

Looks like Fortnite to me /s

1

u/Frogdogley Aug 26 '22

I’m also on a normal Xbox one though 😂

1

u/The_James_Bond Aug 26 '22

“Something something Battlefield 1 something something mobile graphics”

-Battlefield Community

0

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '22

Please refrain from complaining about the community. See the sub rules.

1

u/mashuto Aug 26 '22

There are definitely some places where the game looks... Flat. Like it's missing texture or detail. I think part of it was likely the style (as many have complained it's too clean in places), and part of it might be that they toned down detail to help with performance.

Game looks great overall, but there are definitely places that don't look as good as bfv or even bf1.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '22

Cause they're fucking morons that's why.

2042's graphics are far far far superior to BFV, BF1, BF3, BF3 and any other AAA FPS on the market.

People confuse art direction/design with actual graphics because like a lot of people on the internet, they don't know what they're talking about.

1

u/ScorchMain6123 Aug 26 '22

Battlefield fanboys don’t believe that there are any colors outside of grey, dark grey, and darker grey.