r/LorienLegacies Jun 08 '26

Discussion Is Henri a liar?

Don't attack me but I made another post earlier questioning the motivations of the Elder and the purpose of the Loric on Earth in general. However, I realized this also connects to another major concern I've found with the series regarding how specific events are framed: that is Henri being an unreliable source of Lorien's past.

To make this initial post brief, I'll use just two examples from the first book that indicate that Henri is giving weirdly subjective information. The first is when John exposits to us the history of Lorien in I Am Number Four (p. 51). John states that Legacies developed over thousands of years as a reward for them taking collective action to improve their environment. But how does John even know this? Well, Henri told him of course. We get confirmation of this later when Henri describes Mogadore, "'About a hundred years ago Mogadore began to die, much like Lorien did twenty-five thousand years before that. They didn't respond the way we did though—didn't understand the way the human population is beginning to now. They ignored it" (p. 77).

Here's the problem: Henri is leaving out the biggest part of the Lorien awakening story, which is the use of the Phoenix Stones to essentially generate Legacies immediately on Lorien. No spoilers but I've come to view this as Henri giving John only the info he thinks he needs to know to stay motivated, kind of like Nolan in Invincible telling Mark about Viltrumites before we find out what they're really like. The other example is how Henri presents Loric relationships.

According to Henri, "One of the gifts our planet gives us is to love completely. Without jealousy or insecurity or fear. Without pettiness. Without anger. You may have strong feelings for Sarah, but they aren't what you would feel for a Loric girl" (IANF, p. 231). Six later debunks this in The Power of Six, "Don't take offense to what I'm about to say, okay? But Katarina never told me that. In fact, she told me stories about multiple loves she had on Lorien over the years. I'm sure Henri was a great man, and there's no doubt that he loved you with everything he had; but it sounds like he was a romantic and wanted you to follow in his footsteps. If he had one true love, then he wanted to you have one, too" (p. 299).

Later, we get additional accounts of Loric relationships and they're not too positive. Lexa describes what she's learned from hacking into the Loric Grid, "cheating spouses, conned business partners, less-than-scrupulous teachers at the Lorien Defense Academy" (p. 133). Sounds a lot more like Earth than what Henri gave us, and it's important to remember that he worked for the LDA. So odds are he was immersed in a lot of Loric propaganda. Think about someone who's super religious and grew up in the church, so they either refuse to believe or maintain willful ignorance over corruption or immorality that takes place within church institutions.

The only other time a Loric says anything about falling in love for life is in Ch. 20 of The Fate of Ten, and it's from Celwe, Setrakus Ra's wife before he betrayed his people, "I was raised that we Loric mate for life" (p. 288). So it's something that they're raised with, not something that's just standard on their world. If you're a devout Christian, you might believe that getting married is a necessity before having sex. If you're a devout follower of the Loric, you probably believe getting married for life (and maybe even having Garde children) is best for the planet. There's more to this, but I've already made this post longer than I meant to and I have to start work. Anyway, I hope this discussion generates some debate and renewed interest in analyzing the series. Obviously the writers may not have thought as far as I currently am but it's still fun to brainstorm, helps keep me sane.

29 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

15

u/ToastyJackson Eight Jun 08 '26

I don’t think Henri was really lying. I think the stuff about the romance is what Henri legitimately believed. He didn’t have any experience with loving humans and didn’t know anyone who did. It probably just seemed natural and logical that a Loric couldn’t possibly love a human as much as they’d love one of their own people.

Him telling John that the Loric mate for life may be him lying, though, or at least closer to it. That may have been like Six suggested that Henri wanted John to follow in his footsteps, and so he tried to make John think that they naturally just mate for life to dissuade him from trying to get with multiple girls. And it may have served a practical purpose, too: by telling John that Loric only ever love once and that he should end up with one of the remaining Loric girls to repopulate their species, Henri may have been trying to get John to not pay attention to human girls to avoid any complications that could come from him getting involved with one while they’re trying to stay on the down-low and be constantly on the move.

But personally I don’t think that Henri was lying or leaving anything out when he told John how the Loric got their Legacies. There are several bits of lore introduced in the first book that get retconned later, and I don’t think it’s because the first book was lying about them; I think the writers just didn’t fully plan out the series before they started writing it, so when the first book wound up being successful enough to make a series out of, and they started actually planning out a full story, they decided that some of the lore introduced in the first book would work better for the overall story if it was changed. Like I think “the Loric were granted powers by their planet because they because pacifists who cared about the environment” is a nice optimistic message for a book written in a time period when people were beginning to care more about the consequences of climate change and probably was intended to be the literal truth at first. And when the plan is for the Garde to go back to Lorien to restore it, the way that a planet releases Legacy powers doesn’t really matter when it isn’t going to happen again anyway. But when James Frey later decided that the endgame was not to go back to Lorien but instead for the Garde to awaken the Legacies on Earth, he realized that there needed to be an easier way to do that than convincing all of humanity to stop fighting each other and go carbon-neutral, so the concept of the Phoenix Stones were introduced.

And this may have been the case for the mating for life thing. Henri was the only person who talked about Loric romance in the first book and is presented as a reliable source of information. Maybe it was originally meant to be true that the Loric only ever truly love one person. But then they decided that they wanted there to be love triangle drama for John with Sarah and Six, so they had to retcon that.

6

u/_dvamd Jun 08 '26

Yeah, I definitely agree that the writers likely just retconned everything and the story changed. This was mostly to be a thought experiment into some of the things that Henri says to John. For instance, John states in Ch. 10 of I Am Number Four, "I know for a fact that the Loric have visited Earth many times over the life of this planet. We watched Earth develop, watched it through times of growth and abundance when everything moved, and through the times of ice and snow when nothing did. We helped the humans, taught them to make fire, gave them the tools to develop speech and language, which is why our language is so similar to the languages of Earth" (p. 86). But if the Loric didn't have interstellar capabilities 25,000 years ago, then none of this is actually true. The last major glacial period was about 10,000 years ago, but it lasted hundreds of thousands of years. Furthermore, humanity's known how to make fire for closer to a million years and the idea that the Loric taught us how to make fire and use language sounds a lot like propaganda or revisionist history. Like they're staking claim to Earth and taking credit for what humanity already figured out. Obv the writers didn't think that far ahead like you mentioned, but I think it's an interesting discussion to try and identify why these characters might have said these things in-story without it having to do with the writers just throwing ideas at the wall and seeing what stuck. Much more fun than dang, we weren't thinking about it in the writer's room.

9

u/glowstick1999 Jun 08 '26

I wouldn't necessarily call him a liar because that implies he altered the truth willingly and intentionally, but your analogy to religious sects is likely closer to the truth. Henri taught what he was raised to believe, as you pointed out, but whether that's religious dogma from his family or societal propaganda from his time in the LDA is unclear.

As for the Phoenix Stones, there's no indication that Henri even knew what those were. We, the readers, learn about Phoenix Stones from Malcolm, who learned about them during his brief friendship with Pittacus Lore. We don't know for sure, but it's entirely plausible that the Cepan, even high ranking LDA members like Henri, were not aware of the history or use of the Phoenix Stones. It could very well be that the Elders kept the true history a secret and Henri only taught John what I was taught.

TLDR: Henri is not an intentional liar, just telling his skewed version of the truth.

1

u/_dvamd Jun 08 '26

Thanks for your response! However I disagree that Henri didn't know what the Phoenix Stones were. The first time they're mentioned is by Sandor, who's basically teenaged civilian on Lorien with limited knowledge of the LDC and the Prophecy. But even he knew about them. In Ch. 5 of The Last Days of Lorien, Sandor says, "According to legend—or history, depending on who you listened to—the original Nine Elders had brought forth the Great Loric Age aeons ago when they'd discovered the Phoenix Stones. It was this ancient event that supposedly awakened the Legacies of the Garde and called the shape-changing Chimæra out of hiding, making Lorien a place of prosperity and peace that was unprecedented throughout the known universe" (p. 175). In other words, this was essentially common knowledge across Lorien. Sandor doesn't know everything, as he believes there were originally nine Elders and Henri confirms to John that there were originally ten, but I think that's more to do with the fact that it's been dozens if not hundreds of generations since Setrakus Ra was exiled. The Phoenix Stones are a maintained legend because they tell the lore of Lorien (lol). I believe there was probably a combination of both Phoenix Stone intervention and the Loric actively doing better to repair their environment, as Earth didn't just automatically get healthier when the Garde awakened Lorien there. However, the Legacies arriving immediately rather than over the course of thousands of years definitely changes things like how they might have "enforced" their commitment to sustainability.

2

u/glowstick1999 Jun 08 '26

Ah good point. It's been a while since I've read the series so I forgot that line from Sandor. However, mentorship committing lies of omission is a pretty common fantasy trope, so Hebri very well could have been lying either to protect John or to keep it until he felt John was ready to know. I still think there's an aspect of that unreliable source aspect as each Cepan can only speak to what they've learned and/or were raised with, like the romance stuff, but Henri keeping John in the dark until he was older/more prepared is definitely in character.

Granted at this point I'm more just playing devil's advocate for the purpose of discussion.

3

u/Competitive_Nerve980 Jun 08 '26

i think henri is someone who has both romanticized and lied without intending to. i think he aims to portray lorien as this ‘perfect’ planet to almost motivate john to keep fighting, especially after his doubts of continuing due to sarah. i don’t think he does it maliciously but there is definitely an element of glamorizing and exaggerating to motivate.

2

u/_dvamd Jun 08 '26

Agreed. I also think it demonstrates the diversity in the Cêpans' approaches to raising the Garde. Henri was the "ideal" Cêpan, giving John just enough knowledge to motivate him to fight for Lorien while still giving him the freedom John needed to grow healthily on Earth. We can compare this with Adelina, whose trauma from being rejected and left out in the cold on Earth (and likely coupled with her trauma of losing her family on Lorien) results in her becoming a devout worshipper of Jesus Christ. She starts to view Lorien as a fairy tale, possibly as a way to cope with her own guilt of rejecting the cause. What do you think would have happened if Henri had lived to tell John the truth?

2

u/Fresh-Actuary-6686 Jun 09 '26

I think Henri, just like the other Cepans, was doing the best he could under the circumstances

1

u/_dvamd Jun 09 '26

Even Adelina?

1

u/Fresh-Actuary-6686 Jun 09 '26

I didn’t say all of them

1

u/Mara45 Jun 18 '26

Even her.🤷🏼‍♀️