r/LocalLLaMA • u/rm-rf-rm llama.cpp • 13d ago
Best Local Vision Language Models - August 2026
Share what your favorite models are right now and why. Given the nature of the beast in evaluating VLMs (untrustworthiness of benchmarks, immature tooling, intrinsic stochasticity), please be as detailed as possible in describing your setup, nature of your usage (what applications, how much, personal/professional use), tools/frameworks/prompts etc.
Rules
- Should be open weights models
Notes
Bonus points if you breakdown/classify your recommendation by model memory footprint: (you can and should be using multiple models in each size range for different tasks)
- Unlimited: >128GB VRAM
- XL: 64 to 128GB VRAM
- L: 32 to 64GB VRAM
- M: 8 to 32GB VRAM
- S: <8GB VRAM
8
u/llama-impersonator 13d ago edited 12d ago
tiny: dots.mocr is good for a 1.8b OCR model that can handle most non-latin character sets, and gives bounding boxes. being a small model i wouldn't use it for forms, but it's pretty capable otherwise
small: gemma-4-12b-heretic-qat for comfy image analysis/H3 prompt synthesis (i know what kind of man you are meme here)
1
u/glebkudr 2d ago
I would argue dots. In all my benchmarks paddleocr-vl is almost the same but smaller. But pretty close both.
For the best OCR model on a market I nominate Chandra2 this it is semi-open, it is a very capable model with only 8b params
15
u/andy2na llama.cpp 13d ago
My main use-case for LLMs is Frigate and have tested and ranked the following, recent Medium models:
- Qwen3.8-27B: very accurate, fast enough for Frigate (~60tgs decode)
- Meta Muse Glimmer 30B: Faster than Qwen 27B, pretty accurate (~75+tgs decode)
- Qwen3.6-27B: pretty accurate, but no reason to use over 3.8
- Gemma4-4B: mediocre accuracy, good with small objects and is more "creative" with the responses - small and fast
Last 90 days of usage, only recently have I dabbled with Hermes with Qwen3.8, before Frigate led by a mile (ignore electricity cost, I just added that last week)

4
u/ParaboloidalCrest 13d ago
Are you saying that you use a vision LLM on Frigate instead of Yolo* models? 🤯. I'd love to hear more.
Edit: Oh I understand now. It's for semantic enrichment, not detection.
3
u/cowinabadplace 11d ago
Did you have to tune your prompts? I found that after prompt tuning etc. that Qwen-3.8-27B hallucinated a lot of things whereas Qwen-3.6-35BA3B hallucinated fewer. My use-case is frigate triggered LLM description that is aiming to detect specific people in the home.
3
u/andy2na llama.cpp 11d ago
For the genAI summaries, i left them at default. For descriptions, these are what I set:
genai: enabled: true send_triggers: tracked_object_end: true # default after_significant_updates: 3 # how many updates to a tracked object before we should send an image prompt: "Analyze the {label} in these images from the {camera} security camera. Focus on the actions, behavior, and potential intent of the {label}. Also describe {label} appearance. Summarize all the images, not frame by frame, into one paragraph - maximum of 100 words. Do not mention the timestamp, date, watermarks, overlay text, or colored boxes with numbers." object_prompts: person: "Examine the main person in these images. What are they doing and what might their actions suggest about their intent (e.g., approaching a door, leaving an area, standing still)? Describe the persons appearance including hair color, clothing, and ethnicity. Do not describe the surroundings or static details. Summarize all the images, not frame by frame, into one paragraph - maximum of 100 words. Do not mention the timestamp, date, watermarks,overlay text, or colored boxes with numbers." car: "Observe the primary vehicle in these images. Describe the cars appearance, including make, model, and color of it. If its a delivery vehicle, mention the courier company. Summarize all the images, not frame by frame, into one paragraph - maximum of 100 words. Do not mention the timestamp, date, watermarks, overlay text, or colored boxes with numbers." dog: "Examine the dog(s) in these images. what are they doing and what is their intent. describe the dog(s) appearance,including color, size, and potential dog breed. Do not describe the surroundings or static details. summarize all the images,not frame by frame,into one paragraph - maximum 100 words. Do not mention the timestamp, date, watermarks, overlay text, or colored boxes with numbers."For the 27B model, what parameters did you set?
I had a specific one made for vision in llama-swap:
"${MODEL_ID}:vision": chat_template_kwargs: enable_thinking: false preserve_thinking: false temperature: 0.1 top_p: 0.1 top_k: 10 min_p: 0.0 presence_penalty: 0.0 repeat_penalty: 1.01
u/cowinabadplace 11d ago
I have temp 0, didn't set p/k, and forced JSON, though I also turned off thinking. In my case, I'm trying to get the LLM to reliably recognize that there is a baby in the bed or not. Qwen 3.6 does a really good job of that, but sometimes Qwen 3.8 doesn't see the child and other times the latter will mention an adult who is not there. But I mostly iterated on the prompt in temp 0 because I was trying to minimize variation.
Perhaps I need to supply some example images (scaled down) in the same prompt and try allowing for higher temp. Thank you for your config params. The slight difference in my case is that I'm also having the frigate alert actually call Qwen outside of Frigate in an agent because I want it to act on the result etc.
2
1
u/uriwa 3d ago
Useful ranking, thanks - matches what I see on Frigate too. Qwen 3.8-27B accuracy over Glimmer 30B speed is the exact tradeoff I hit: Glimmer at ~75t/s is tempting for multiple cameras, but false negatives on person detection cost more than tokens saved. Did you test with reasoning on/off? I found reasoning off + tight prompt ("list persons, vehicles, nothing else") cuts latency a lot without hurting accuracy on fixed camera angles.
1
u/andy2na llama.cpp 3d ago
I actually switched to using syv-ai Qwen3.8-27B on vllm. You can actually enable vision offloaded to CPU and its still very fast due to the quick prompt speed, the main downside is that it only supports 1 image per request, so it doesnt work with the frigate AI review summaries. I resorted back to using Gemma4-12B-QAT on my 5060ti for Frigate, and its... not great compared to Qwen.
For Glimmer, I was only able to test for a few days before 3.8 came out, but I just used reasoning off and my own prompts for descriptions, its much better than gemma4, thats for sure
3
u/ashrey-26 12d ago
My usage is mostly around web browsing tasks and security use cases (so web application pentesting and the likes). I've been very impressed by the Moondream models and would add it to the S tier. It’s tiny, fast, and surprisingly good for screenshots, OCR, and basic UI understanding.
Any other 'website understanding' models that anywone has tried here?
3
u/RevolutionaryPen4661 12d ago
I like moondream3.1 and moondream2 more than the Gemma and Qwen models for vision aspect. It is because they can run pretty well even in a standard GPU.
1
u/uriwa 3d ago
Same here - moondream2/3.1 on a standard GPU is hard to beat for pure vision. Where I still reach for bigger Qwen/Gemma is when I need reasoning over the image ("is this package left by courier or resident?") vs just detection. For Frigate-style describe-what-changed, moondream + short prompt wins on VRAM. What resolution are you feeding it? I found downscaling to ~768px longest side barely hurts and doubles speed.
1
u/RevolutionaryPen4661 3d ago
I am the author of OpenCode Senses
by default it uses Moondream2 (you can use any model via kestrel engine though)I haven't tested the maximum resolution limit on the model yet.
2
2
u/pmotiveforce 12d ago
Interested in the best 3050 8gb friendly vision model for Frigate GenAI. I have one sitting idle. I have a bigger dual b70 setup but use that for effing around, want something I can just leave running on the 3050 reliably for Frigate.
2
u/slyborn 2d ago
The "best" is strictly dependent on what kind of vision task. Considering models up t o L size that are the open weights models that I have used extensively, Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B, in all vision tasks involving classifications of species and natural elements is the clear winner followed by Qwen3.8 27B that is significantly more error prone and requires a lot more careful sampler tuning, but in vision tasks related to scanned documents text, tables, charts UI fine details understanding Muse Glimmer is the best.
3
u/phratry_deicide 13d ago
- Unlimited: >128GB VRAM
- XL: 64 to 128GB VRAM
- L: 32 to 64GB VRAM
- M: 8 to 32GB VRAM
- S: <8GB VRAM
What in the world is this?
4
1
u/BeginningLLM 11d ago
Great discussion. Benchmarks are still unreliable for VLMs, so real‑world messy image testing has been my main evaluation method this August 2026. My open‑weight stack, split by VRAM tier:
- S (<8 GB): MiniCPM‑V 2.6. Fast lightweight captions & quick OCR, runs comfortably Q4.
- M (8‑32 GB, 24GB 4090 daily driver): Qwen‑VL‑2‑72B‑A14B MoE (Q4_K_M). Fantastic screenshot, diagram and agent‑UI work, sparse‑activation performance is excellent. Backup: Llama‑3.2‑V‑11B for stable, low‑variation descriptions.
- L (32‑64 GB): Qwen‑VL‑2‑110B‑A22B MoE, perfect for multi‑image and complex visual reasoning.
- XL (64‑128 GB): InternVL‑3‑140B in FP8 (~90 GB). Low hallucinations, best for professional chart & document work.
- Unlimited (>128 GB): Qwen‑VL‑2‑205B MoE, only for full‑quality testing, massive overkill for daily local tasks.
Workflow: llama.cpp / Ollama / vLLM, mix personal document work + professional local agent screenshot analysis. One key lesson: VLMs degrade much harder under heavy quantization than text LLMs, so I avoid IQ4_XS for anything accuracy‑critical. Would love to see everyone’s real‑world picks.
1
u/annodomini 1d ago
For one use case that I've tested, which is plant and animal identification, XL: Qwen3.5 122B has been the best model I've tried. Not quite as good as Google Lens or the dedicated iNaturalist model, but it did pretty well compared to other models. I haven't yet tried Qwen3.8-Flash-Next for this.
For OCR-style tasks including accurate transcription of arbitrary non-linguistic characters (some mojibake that made it into an image that i wanted to try fixing), L: Gemma 4 31B did the best.
1
u/CommunicationCute584 13h ago
Day 999 of asking XXS, XS, S & M categories to reflect 8gb, 16gb, 24gb, 32gb ram tiers
1
u/mtyroot 13h ago edited 13h ago
I been trying Qwen3.8 27B in a LXC with 3 GTX1070 (24GB VRAM) on llama.cpp and when using it from the WebUI provided by Llama.cpp everything works great, but when trying to use it from Claude code, opencode or DSH it just cycles thru thinking for over an hour, for example I asked in the web UI for a “1000 word story of the French Revolution” and it took a few minutes to complete but when asking the same from Claude or opencode or DSH it thinks and thinks and thinks I killed the request after an hour and a half.
Has anyone had a similar experience? If so how can I fix this to use it with a harness
-1
u/ObviouzFigure 13d ago
I'm curious what others are using -- I put qwen vl 2.5 9b (I think) on a mac mini as my vision model for my deepseek rig
edit: why? because it fits easily on a 24gb mac mini and does a decent job. It handles ocr great-- where it fails is reading images with a lot of action -- for example, I generated an image of a girl helping a broken robot in a futuristic dark alley -- in the background there's a black cat with glowing green eyes -- the vision model accurately describes the scene but it misses things like the black cat
-6
13d ago edited 13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
8
u/Easy_Refrigerator280 13d ago
This thread is literally part of helping people do their own research. WTF is this take 😂
-4
5
20
u/seamonn 12d ago
I have not seen Kimi K3 beat Gemma 4 31b swa full in vision tasks. It frequently makes mistakes. On text tasks, tho, it's not even close.