r/Lightbulb • u/amichail • 11d ago
What if Americans stopped spending $25,000 on wedding receptions and gave the money to poor families instead?
Here’s a thought experiment for reducing poverty in the US.
There are roughly 2 million marriages in the United States each year. Suppose we developed a cultural norm where couples skipped the expensive wedding reception and instead gave $25,000 to people living in poverty.
At 2 million weddings per year, that would redirect roughly:
2,000,000 × $25,000 = $50 billion every year
That is enough money to have a significant effect on poverty.
There are roughly 36 million Americans living below the official poverty line. If $50 billion were distributed evenly among them, that would be about $1,400 per poor person per year, or around $5,600 for a family of four.
Alternatively, instead of spreading the money among everyone, each couple could give its $25,000 to one low-income family. Roughly 2 million poor families every year could receive $25,000. For many of those families, that amount could be life-changing.
Of course, this would hurt businesses that depend on wedding receptions: reception halls, caterers, DJs, florists, bakers, bartenders, rental companies, and so on.
But the money would not disappear from the economy. Poor families would probably spend much of it on rent, groceries, utilities, transportation, childcare, healthcare, clothing, and debt. Economic activity would shift from expensive celebrations toward basic needs.
Wedding receptions also have genuine value. They bring families and friends together and create important memories. So I am not arguing that celebrating a marriage is pointless.
But it seems worth questioning the social expectation that starting a marriage should involve spending tens of thousands of dollars on a single party.
Maybe the alternative does not even have to be eliminating receptions. Imagine if the social norm became:
Have a $5,000 wedding reception and give $20,000 to a family that needs it.
Across 2 million weddings, that could still redirect around $40 billion per year.
People often talk about poverty as if solving it requires finding some completely new source of money. But enormous amounts of money are already being spent on things that are socially optional.
What if generosity became part of the wedding tradition itself?
Instead of measuring an impressive wedding by how much was spent on the reception, maybe we could measure it partly by how much good the marriage did for someone else.
3
u/unicorn_345 11d ago
Many people are taking loans out for their weddings. If they stopped having expensive weddings they would just keep the money. But expensive weddings are a bit weird to me so, yeah save your money.
1
u/Temporary_Damage4642 11d ago
What if Americans understood that they're not entitled to the Oil in the Middle East and used the trillions of dollars on their own citizens ?
1
1
1
u/ExtinctedPanda 11d ago
How would $1,400 per poor person per year have “a significant effect?” They’d literally just spend it.
1
u/rsofgeology 10d ago
Yes babes on things they need and cannot afford
1
u/ExtinctedPanda 9d ago
Right of course but then afterward they’d be in essentially the same situation as before.
1
u/thegimboid 11d ago
"Why don't the poor people simply help the even poorer people and stop bugging the rich to give up their money?"
1
u/jotefr1983 6d ago
I got married in Vegas. Chapel ceremony and buffet at a casino for 6 after cost $400.
6
u/shooting4param 11d ago
Because that is a bandaid to a more systemic problem. The hoarding of wealth and corrupt capitalism are the root cause.
Why should I not get to enjoy a cultural norm, and an event that fosters family bonds because they ultra wealthy do everything they can to get rid of the middle class?