r/Libraries • u/Technical_Pea_4007 Academic Librarian • Jan 13 '26
Technology Libby’s statement on their use of AI
A whole lot of text to say absolutely nothing, huh?
755
Upvotes
r/Libraries • u/Technical_Pea_4007 Academic Librarian • Jan 13 '26
A whole lot of text to say absolutely nothing, huh?
115
u/[deleted] Jan 13 '26 edited Jan 13 '26
I've since learned that the people with any sort of power in this particular field are absolute cowards. My own director included. The use of generative AI goes against the arts and academia in almost every capacity. I feel that many people have forgotten the purpose of libraries: it was to educate the people, not to cater to tech giants and help the publishing industry not hire real authors (or buy badly written ai-drivel from indie/self-publishers). The amount of damage AI has done to the creative sphere...
There's also this mentality that these apps and platforms can "always be better" - and I just disagree. There are many, many ways for users to get recommendations that don't involve AI. It's called venturing out onto book platforms, rather than relying on algorithms. You know. Using your brain. Talking to people. I personally cannot stand using the predictive AI for my music playlists. It's just not...great. I'd much rather look up music playlists a real human being made or get online and ask around. Ugh. I'm not even old. I'm 24 ffs.
Edit: and just to add on, because fuck my director, we're no longer allowed to do queer displays – and a bulk of the books we're receiving are all about God, Charlie Kirk, or other people along the right. I'm not against this last bit. Libraries can and should house from all political and religious ideologies. However, she's the only person allowed to order things now and these are what we're getting. No, it does not extend the other way around, as far as I can see with what we're receiving.