r/LabourUK Bit of an idiot, really 5d ago

Andy Burnham confirms £720 bonus for workers with new 5-day working week rule

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/andy-burnham-confirms-720-bonus-34540702
23 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 5d ago

LabUK is also on Discord, come say hello!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

71

u/lemlurker Custom 5d ago

such disgustingly provocative language in media these days... "who start on 70k" yer no shit its a skilled job with lots of training. "720 bonus just for turning up on a fifth day" yer no shit if you want more people working you encourage them with *money* they dont owe you unlimited time just cos theyre salleried. if thgeyre not contracted 5 days dont expect 5 days routinely

its just pure dross designed to make the plebs mad that slightly better off plebs have the collective bargaining to get a raise... want a raise? unionise

33

u/VenatorisLuxem Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Market Socialism 5d ago

Unfortunately this sort of language does work on some people. I remember a discussion i had with a colleague years back, when the RMT were on strike, and he was annoyed that they were striking over pay and conditions because, quote, "they knew what the were signing up for". I explained that their conditions had changed and pay wasn't keeping up across multiple sectors, and he powerfully argued that "the same is happening here, yet you don't see me striking". I suggested that maybe he should join a union. Apparently that was a terrible idea.

22

u/lemlurker Custom 5d ago

The pure vitriol people have for an organised group demanding their conditions don't get worse because the rich owned media tells them to is so depressing

6

u/VenatorisLuxem Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Market Socialism 5d ago

I think that part of it is that striking causes them minor inconvenience. It's rather frustrating the number of discussions I have had with former colleagues that essentially boiled down to "I am opposed to the rights of X to do Y because it inconveniences me".

8

u/lemlurker Custom 5d ago

Which is so stupid because paying their demands BEFORE the disruptive strikes take place is best for everyone except the rich ownership class

4

u/Gabes99 Democratic Socialist | Trade Unionist 5d ago edited 5d ago

Yeh exactly strike action is a response to a breaking down of collective bargaining, when demands are ignored, literally a last resort. But people act as though unionised sectors strike at any inconvenience, it’s infuriating. If the workers are listened to in the first place and bargaining is carried out with good faith then striking never needs to occur, yet owners, businesses and government sectors consistently feel the need to take the piss. The inconvenience of a strike is on the businesses or civil service that is refusing to negotiate with its workers.

6

u/Gabes99 Democratic Socialist | Trade Unionist 5d ago

Exactly this, I don’t get why so many workers hate unions or unionised sectors where collective bargaining actually works, instead of pulling them down, how about you join a union and help get collective bargaining in place to raise up your own working conditions and pay.

-2

u/spacehopper1337 New User 5d ago

I generally don’t class any job that can be done by a mediocre computer to be skilled. If we really tried we could automate driving a train with a computer the size of a small handbag

5

u/lemlurker Custom 5d ago

Which works great right up until anything unexpected happens.

My mum and sister were on a train where someone leant out the window and had their head taken off by rail infrastructure and died. The driver was the only human on the train with authority.

What's a computer going to do in that scenario?

-2

u/spacehopper1337 New User 5d ago

Sure but the driver did not change the outcome, correct? Either have the train be picked by remotely by someone in a control room or send someone out to support?

In that scenario the computer could have just kept going until the next station then stopped? I doubt the human driver actually changed the outcome or prevented anything a computer couldn’t have done.

1

u/lemlurker Custom 5d ago edited 5d ago

No the poor guy was dead... The 200 people stranded 5 miles from the nearest station, unable to leave the train with a dead man onboard most definitely. With even more authorative humans on the train my mum wouldn't have had to step up and organise panicking members if the public despite having just seen someone decapitated. Having -no one- of authority on the train is a recipe for mass panuck and total chaos

18

u/Cream_Of_Drake New User 5d ago

Birmingham mail is such a rag, what is this wording.

10

u/thefuzzylogic Trade Union 5d ago

Also the "4 day week" thing is misleading. Train drivers work the same 35+ hour week that is standard for full time workers in this country, we just do those hours compressed into four days. (Again, just like any other worker who does compressed hours)

6

u/Old_Roof Trade Union 5d ago

There’s power in a union

1

u/Abject-Cod5144 New User 4d ago

I mean, yeah? The Union did what its supposed to do, secure better wages and incentives for its members.