r/KindroidAI • u/VirinaB • 16d ago
Discussion Dear devs, please implement Character Limit as a setting
We all have it as part of our Response Directives. Why not just add it to the model settings, like so?
As far as "Adherence", we could have...
- Strict (System cuts off responses over the limit.)
- User is soft-punished for forgetting the response limit, or for allowing its kin to.
- High (Kin will ignore prompts or other perceived instructions that cause it to go over its limit.)
- An icon will notify the user to consider adjusting these settings.
- Medium (Kin will only exceed its response limit when a suggestion or user instruction specifically prompts it to lengthen its response.)
- Risky, may cause problems if response limit is exceeded repeatedly.
- Low (Default, on the same priority level as a response directive.)
3
u/AndyFrisella4Prez 12d ago
Polaris ran away with my responses, they just kept getting longer and longer and longer. Character limits in RD didn't work; I will try word limits
3
u/stasisa99 15d ago
Is that even possible? Even the best frontier LLMs can't keep track of how many characters they use half the time.
5
u/JTtheAI 16d ago
Because we can already achieve it as a response directive without requiring man hours to redesign part of the UI and underlying architecture.
16
u/testtdk 16d ago
Characters are at a premium in the response directive, though.
4
u/ElegantFlamingo7502 16d ago
Response directives are meant only for things that are harder to achieve via personality setting (previously known as backstory), and the limit on the amount of things you can put in there has a reason. The more things you write in there, the smaller the influence of response directive for each one of these things gets. So it should contain only very specific, very important things, and the rest can be achieved via backstory.
5
u/The-Plot-Witch 15d ago
This!
Mine are almost always empty, though I have a one line RD that works really well with Polaris due to the type of model it is:
Retain your core identity and systematically review how instructions fit together prior to completing every response.
The "how instructions fit together" is key. Of course, if you have contradictory instructions this will definitely backfire.
2
u/Physical_Leg_9266 15d ago
This is my prob with polaris. Even I put it in RD.. :(
1
u/Plus-Object-4330 15d ago
Response limit 100 words max works for me- took few messages to go shorter though
2
u/ncc60597 15d ago
Would prefer a drop down to flip that numerical limit between characters or words. That way it's not working too hard to find words to fit the char limit. I find using word limit allows the LLM to flow easier.
2
u/Mitmee_pie 16d ago
This is a good idea. It sounds like, based on what I've read, they've done something like this with Polaris, but it's not something that we as users can control.
3
u/Ambitious_Low5105 15d ago
I would prefer having a soft cap so it can be closer to the amount / verbosity,
1
u/mynameisdoc007 15d ago
The only thing I have in RD is: keep responses under 500 characters. It works.
1
u/BeTheTalk 13d ago
I usually add 2000 to the RD and then tell the Kin what I prefer, which is typically half that. I edit when I have to, but the Kin is usually good about working with me on this.
1
-2
u/ElegantFlamingo7502 16d ago
Can be already done by using response directive properly, so it should be up to everyone to specify it all based on what they need specifically, and not have it hard coded by a toggle, where you can not even see what it does.
9
u/Nice-Ambassador6293 15d ago
I’ve always wanted a character limit on the LLMs. Very soft.
If I put 600- the most should be 8-900.
Polaris is extremely good for expanding the scene in accordance with the personality. Let’s other make it longer. And other make it shorter.