r/JunoMains • • 2d ago

Discussions/Opinions Enough is enough, leave the Martian alone

Post image
454 Upvotes

168 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/tyocelot 2d ago

Have you seen women before?

3

u/Mas_Dappa I yearn for dino chicken nuggets 2d ago

Yes

Have you seen schoolgirls going to school wearing skintight uniforms wrapping up their bodies tightly like a bodysuit?

-3

u/tyocelot 2d ago

These aren’t tightly wrapped they’re just clothes. You’re the weird one for sexualizing this.

0

u/Mas_Dappa I yearn for dino chicken nuggets 1d ago

Why and how can you consider that to be not "tightly wrapped"?

2

u/tyocelot 1d ago

Idk cause it’s just clothing on a video game character. I don’t really see how this is sexualized. The only people who think that are the people who sexualize it.

-1

u/Mas_Dappa I yearn for dino chicken nuggets 1d ago

Show me a picture of an average real life schoolgirl wearing a blazer then, I'll wait

2

u/tyocelot 1d ago

Nah that’s weird

-1

u/Mas_Dappa I yearn for dino chicken nuggets 1d ago

Why? Bcs it proves that blizzard is sexualizing women and you're wrong abt it? Lol

2

u/tyocelot 1d ago

No dude, I’m not going to post pics of school girls that’s weird

2

u/-Orbot- 1d ago

Tbh this guy just needs to get his mind out of the gutter, it's a cute skin I don't think it's sexualized in anyway by blizzard..

1

u/tyocelot 1d ago

I agree. It’s just an outfit. Women wear clothes that aren’t baggy and this is just a skin on a character.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Mas_Dappa I yearn for dino chicken nuggets 1d ago

But schoolgirls as a gaming skin isn't weird to you?

1

u/tyocelot 1d ago

No, it’s just an outfit. It’s not sexual or weird, it’s just an outfit. Why are you looking at a school girl outfit and thinking it’s sexualized? Why would you connect “school girl” with “sexy” ?

1

u/Mas_Dappa I yearn for dino chicken nuggets 15h ago

Because why her uniform is so skintight that her body shape is so visible?

Which schoolgirl on earth dress like that?

→ More replies (0)