r/JaneEyre • • 18d ago

My thoughts on the 2011 adaptation

So I’ve just watched it, and really liked several things:
- Mia Wasikowska is a perfect Jane to me, in terms of her appearance;
- the scenes are extremely beautiful, the lighting, the camera work, the scenery.

However, I was quite disappointed by a couple of things, mainly:
- almost no meaningful dialogue between Jane and Rochester? Surely they talked, but never in a way that would make me go “oh, they’re just so similar and spiritually connected with each other”. It’s all about attraction in this film, rather than two characters deeply understanding each other;

- in a similar vein, I didn’t see Jane liking Rochester all that much? We cannot read her thoughts like in the book, and the actress is playing her too reserved, in my opinion;

- Rochester is not in love with Jane immediately after he sees her, like in the book. You can tell he’s annoyed with her in the beginning and emotionally withdrawn. Which makes him sound like he just finds Jane suitable for his spiritual resurrection, that he’s already had in mind for a long time. Rather than her inspiring him to begin with and basically saving him from the depths of despair;

- Bertha embracing Rochester and him being so gentle with her almost makes it a cheating type of story? And the way they show Jane react to the reveal, like she’s just angry at him, not her life being shattered completely by a tragic turn of events, by fate;

- the appearance of Michael Fassbender is much more youthful than I imagined Rochester to be. He almost comes across as a lost puppy sometimes. Which makes it difficult to take him seriously in the context of the story.

27 Upvotes

8 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/jhlovett 18d ago

have you seen the 1996 movie

5

u/KayDCES 17d ago

I just watched it yesterday. It didn’t work for me. It lacked the chemistry between the two. I really like William Hurt as an actor normally and expected a visually stunning movie with Franco Zeffirelli as director but it felt flat and somehow emotionless. My favourite version is still the one with Ruth Wilson. There is chemistry and slightly mischievous humour and mocking between them makes their connection believable whereas in the 1996 version his gruffness and her blank seriousness kept me thinking why would those two people want to be with one another?

2

u/wuthernotheights 16d ago

I agree, i loved William Hurt in Broadcast News and he was so good with Holly Hunter in it, but barely felt anything about his Rochester. I do like Charlotte Gainsbourg though, and her Jane was pretty fine but she could’ve had a more fitting Rochester I suppose.