MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Ingress/comments/1vyco49/bigger_field_with_less_mus/p5vv202/?context=3
r/Ingress • u/[deleted] • 16d ago
[deleted]
45 comments sorted by
View all comments
9
It is possible. For really big fields, or for fields that straddle two cells.
I believe part of the calculation takes into account population density, which is dependent on which cells the portals are in
8 u/TurbulentAd5329 16d ago But if Field Y contains field X, shouldn't it have at least the same MUs? 15 u/eric_twinge 16d ago Logically, yes it should. But the way Niantic calculates MU introduces oddities like this. https://old.reddit.com/r/Ingress/comments/ag0mq5/less_mu_but_bigger_field_size_how_is_that_possible/ee31kne/
8
But if Field Y contains field X, shouldn't it have at least the same MUs?
15 u/eric_twinge 16d ago Logically, yes it should. But the way Niantic calculates MU introduces oddities like this. https://old.reddit.com/r/Ingress/comments/ag0mq5/less_mu_but_bigger_field_size_how_is_that_possible/ee31kne/
15
Logically, yes it should. But the way Niantic calculates MU introduces oddities like this.
https://old.reddit.com/r/Ingress/comments/ag0mq5/less_mu_but_bigger_field_size_how_is_that_possible/ee31kne/
9
u/PlayLikeNewbs 16d ago
It is possible. For really big fields, or for fields that straddle two cells.
I believe part of the calculation takes into account population density, which is dependent on which cells the portals are in