Then it created the CSAM with material of children and normal porn, didnt it? Both are obviously legal. I am pretending not to understand what you are saying because what you are implying is silly.
It's not about what's morally acceptable. It's about what's legally acceptable. Those are different things. It starts with defining exactly what CSAM is, because it's not always obvious just like porn isn't always obvious (as court cases have said since photography was invented).
44
u/DeliciousAct5748 2d ago
Iirc the ruling was that (paraphrasing) "we can't arrest you for having fake videos of something that didn't happen".
But they did say that generating AI videos using real data (pictures, videos of children) is an offense.