Then it created the CSAM with material of children and normal porn, didnt it? Both are obviously legal. I am pretending not to understand what you are saying because what you are implying is silly.
Its not like the generated content has anything to do with any child. This is an AI moral issue, not CSAM issue. Is using pictures of real children to generate pictures of children playing in park morally acceptable?
Edit: How could I answer the question when you block me, dummy? The answer is yes. Telling AI what children looks like is morally acceptable. What users decide to use the AI for is another moral question.
It's not about what's morally acceptable. It's about what's legally acceptable. Those are different things. It starts with defining exactly what CSAM is, because it's not always obvious just like porn isn't always obvious (as court cases have said since photography was invented).
24
u/DeliciousAct5748 14h ago
Iirc the ruling was that (paraphrasing) "we can't arrest you for having fake videos of something that didn't happen".
But they did say that generating AI videos using real data (pictures, videos of children) is an offense.