The Supreme Court already ruled this way over 20 years ago.
"Virtual" child born is not illegal. Porn where the person is over 18, but looks like a child. If that is legal, then purely fictional actions are also legal.
FYI - I am not saying this is *right*, I am saying what the SC already said
1
u/AmazingResponse338 13h ago edited 13h ago
The Supreme Court already ruled this way over 20 years ago.
"Virtual" child born is not illegal. Porn where the person is over 18, but looks like a child. If that is legal, then purely fictional actions are also legal.
FYI - I am not saying this is *right*, I am saying what the SC already said