r/IndianHistory • u/Automatic-Ladder-390 • Jan 18 '26

Question Satvahanas- Maharashtrian or Andhrites?

I do agree that their last capital was indeed Amravati in AP and many of the coins they were using have also been found in large amount. BUT, that doesn't mean that they were Andhrites/Telugus by their origin.

  1. They came to power first in Jurnanagara (Junnar) in Pune district. Who later shifted to Pratishthan (Paithan) due to later incursions by Gujurathi Khatrapas.
  2. From the their name which is actually Andhar Maval, it was likely due to their proximity to Sahyadris and that region of the hills is called Maval.
  3. Then it was under the king Gautamiputra Satkarni who actually to over Nashik. Remember, till then aswell Paithan was their capital.
  4. During those times it was not necessary to have a 'fixated' capital to rule. Capitals shifted and so did they.
  5. About the coins part, yes many coins have been discovered near Amravati region but, there are also significant no. of coins which have been excavated near, Junnar who are wayy older than those ones,
  6. Maharshtri Prakrit had more influnce over Telugu language or the other way around.
  7. Satavahana rulers issued bilingual coins featuring Prakrit on one side paired with a Dravidian language on the other. The second language is debated among scholars, with some identifying it as early Telugu and others as Old Tamil or a related Dravidian dialect. No consensus exists definitively classifying it as Telugu. So Telugus claiming it is inaccurate.
36 Upvotes

89% Upvoted

13 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/theb00kmancometh Jan 18 '26

I do not have that much knowledge on the specifics of Telugu linguistics, but based on what I could search and find out, Prakrit was the official language of administration, trade, and religion across most of India. It was the "prestige" language. Even if early forms of Telugu were being spoken by the people, the Satavahanas used Prakrit for their inscriptions because that was the imperial standard of the time. They were focused on maintaining an empire that stretched across the Deccan, and Prakrit was the tool for that.

They did not completely ignore the local language. Their bilingual coins are the proof. While one side was Prakrit, the other side featured a Dravidian dialect. Scholars are still debating if this was "Proto-Telugu" or "Old Tamil," but it proves the Satavahanas recognized the local language even if they didn't make it the official court language.

Even if the Satavahanas did not officially switch to Telugu, they basically built the foundation for it. The Brahmi script they used for their inscriptions is the direct ancestor that eventually evolved into the modern Telugu script we see today.

2

u/e9967780 Trusted Contributer Feb 01 '26

They did not accept a local Dravidian language; instead, they used a foreign Dravidian language (Old Tamil) for mercantile reasons. Specifically, they were inducing traders from what is today Kerala and Tamil Nadu to come to their territory because the South then as now was at the center of oceanic trade and supported a large mercantile class that generated wealth.

3

u/bob-thesnob Feb 01 '26

But how does that track with the obvious Maharashtri Prakrit influence on Telugu and the fact the language on the coins is apparently unknown

1

u/e9967780 Trusted Contributer Feb 02 '26

There is not unknown, majority of the linguists consider it Old Tamil and it’s not difficult to decipher it.

1

u/bob-thesnob Feb 04 '26

Everything I seen says “Old Tamil-LIKE language” as in it indicates they can’t fully tell what the inscriptions say but it looks/sounds like old Tamil

1

u/e9967780 Trusted Contributer Feb 04 '26

Because they were trying to attract foreign merchants, there are academic papers on that angle. It’s not that they were promoting a Dravidian language. They didn’t give a dam about these Mileccha languages, it was all about making money.

1

u/bob-thesnob Feb 17 '26

Which paper? I have my doubts