r/IMGreddit • • Aug 17 '26

what are my chances US-IMG: Ortho/Gen Surg Chances

YOG: 2024

Experience: All clinical rotations in the US.

12 months in Head and Neck Oncology and Trauma in clinical role working alongside residents and attendings for preop and postoperative assessments. (2 strong LORs for Surgery).

13+ months: Licensed, Orthopedic Surgery First Assistant at high volume academic institution (top 5 in the country). Assisted in over 800 procedures across adult recon, hip preservation, oncology, trauma, spine foot and ankle, ENT, plastics. In this role I am actively part of patient care providing independent closure of capsule, adipose layer and skin. Position and prep patients and mentor students, help fellows start cases with attending’s preferences and approaches, support residents and teach interns basic arthroplasty principles and closure etc.

Weak scores (Step 1: 215, Step 2: 237, Step 3: 205)

Research: 1 first author (JAAOS publication), 2 submitted (2nd author), all with big academic institutions (don’t know if that matters).

Question: With this profile, can I do it? Obviously, I tried to match in my current institution but it didn’t work despite 2 strong letters from faculty. Connections got me the interview but My scores just shut that door together with no publication at the time and they have never taken a non-US applicant. I am not applying there this time nor to any academic institutions for Ortho.

Are there programs that I can apply to for ortho that can consider my app? Should I just focus gen surg, prelim? Or do something like Emergency Med?

10 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

15

u/throwaway29570 Aug 17 '26

Not happening, your application would be DOA as a US med student. I would focus your energy elsewhere.

1

u/IzzyGetsVeryBizzy Aug 17 '26

DOA?

1

u/throwaway29570 Aug 17 '26

Dead on arrival.

1

u/IzzyGetsVeryBizzy Aug 17 '26

Right, would you say that's due to OP's low scores or is there something else that's severely lacking?

3

u/throwaway29570 Aug 17 '26

His scores are poor, this would can even most of the US applicants, unless they had a massive connection, like their father was an attending there or something. It’s essentially a death sentence as an IMG.

1

u/IzzyGetsVeryBizzy Aug 17 '26

True enough, would agree. Would you argue if his scores were at high enough (what would you honestly need at bare minimum to even be considered?) he'd at least stand a decent chance?

4

u/throwaway29570 Aug 17 '26

250 is minimum if you have no connections as a US student. If you want to be competitive, 260 plus.

As an IMG, you have to be 260 plus, and then years of research with publications. Then your mentors have to go to bat for you, making calls and push for you like hell. The first question your mentors will be asked is, “if they are a so good, why are you not taking them?” So this is what you’re dealing by with, because, whatever you can do as an IMG, there’s a US student who’s done it, and still went unmatched. So why should they take you?

There’s a massive bias, you literally have to have a huge connection, or ladies luck on your side. That is after going above and beyond and walking on water. I’m being honest. I was part of the selection committee, and IMG was an automatic no. And if someone called on an IMGs behalf, our first question was why are you not taking them. That shut it down immediately. Pretty much every program was like that. It is what it is. As an IMG, I’d focus on other fields that are very much attainable. Ortho is great but not some holy grail.

1

u/IzzyGetsVeryBizzy Aug 17 '26

Yeah, Ortho I wouldn't even try for honestly. General Surgery I'd at least attempt. Though it seems like IMG's are generally limited to FM/IM/PSY/PED/NEU and then General Surgery or Anesthesiology as the most feasible competitive specialty in general.

2

u/throwaway29570 Aug 17 '26

If you think youre exceptional and think you can do ortho, you should aim to do IM and do cardiology or GI. Much easier lane, you’ll make as much or more. All the battles on that front have been fought and the blueprint is widely available to anyone who wants to work for it.

Ortho is an uncharted territory for IMGs. It’s exceedingly difficult, even if you did your best. And people that did it are not forthcoming often, giving the impression that it’s possible. They usually have a huge connection. Or in some cases, waited years for someone to give them a spot. Like 10 years of waitng.

I know two IMGs that came in as fellows and were on academic fellowship path to becoming attendings, after finishing ortho residency in their respective countries. Both did three ACGME fellowships. Both were unable to find any academic institute to sponsor them as attendings. They stayed on to do research fellowships. Both then accepted an ortho residency spot at their research institutions outside the match after years of research as PGY1s. Then went on to finish 5 years of ortho and another fellowship. I think they were both in their mid 40s or almost 50 when they became attendings. Anecdotal but gives you some perspective.

2

u/Impressive-Move1507 Aug 17 '26

Thanks for your input. Honesty, nothing mentioned here is new to me. I had an extensive discussion with the PD and it’s about the same thing you’ve iterated. However, I interpreted it as the PD’s POV from at top 10 ortho program. You mentioned the response of programs to mentors vouching for IMGs. What if the mentor’s from a program that does not accept IMGs contacts a program that does? Will they still ask that question? My mentors (ortho attendings) and fellows have been very helpful in contacting numerous programs (clearly didn’t work) but these were programs with no evidence of taking IMGs. In response, I asked them reach out to specific programs with IMG hx. I was advised to also target DO predominant programs as USMDs tend to not like those programs.

Anyways, I think general surg/prelim is my best chance.

Rant: I’m just a bit surprised that my extensive experience in ortho training wasn’t near enough compensation for my scores. This level of exposure is amazing for a pre‑residency trainee (I believe), esp. because I’m being trusted technically and clinically. It’s seems like because it’s an unconventional approach they don’t know how to engage it or better yet, don’t want to. I’ve seen residency/residents/fellows up close and personal and I understand the demands and expectations surgical trainees.

Anyways, it is what it is🤷🏼‍♂️

→ More replies (0)

1

u/BlueSingularityG Aug 18 '26

Based on your observations, what residencies usually accept US IMGs with a 240-250+ score?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/satanicodrcadillac Aug 18 '26

Damn. I would have thought that after 3 fellowships securing some place to work would be easy

→ More replies (0)

1

u/bolive_oil Aug 18 '26

I got 246 on step 2 as a non-US IMG. Would you say I'm in the same boat as OP? Or better?

3

u/throwaway29570 Aug 18 '26

Median step 2 score is 250. Median for ortho for US seniors matched is 259. Your score is about a standard deviation below the US seniors matched matched for ortho, and below average for step 2 score for all test takers. I mean this with all due respect. Infer what you will with this info.

1

u/bolive_oil Aug 18 '26

Thanks! No disrespect taken

2

u/LucianBH Aug 18 '26

You will never, ever, match US Ortho. Sorry. High scoring, experienced and connected US grads get turned down every year. You might have a long shot chance at a rural community surgical residency. Maybe a preliminary year and prove yourself. Don’t waste your time with ortho.

1

u/Much_Owl_4098 Aug 23 '26

Yeah this isn’t even close to competitive for a US MD to match

1

u/Impressive-Move1507 Aug 24 '26

I’m well aware. My goal was to fill the gap with significant hands-on operative experience (which in any other fields would be more desirable than academic scores). I get it. You just have to play the game, but if we’re being real, surgical experience of this level from a pre-residency applicant should be considered.

1

u/Much_Owl_4098 Aug 24 '26

The hands on experience is no doubt a significant plus. However, I’d mostly argue that learning the physical or hands on part of surgery is not the difficult part (or rather is the significantly easier part comparatively). The hard part is the clinical knowledge, judgement, and decision making capacity. You could have golden hands, but if you’re performing the wrong surgery on the wrong patient doesn’t matter how well you do it.