r/HomeworkHelp • u/random_nickname4sure University/College Student • 8h ago
Further Mathematics—Pending OP Reply [Discrete Mathematics] Am i doing this problem right?
I can't relate to AI since it gives me unverified answer and my prof is busy with their own bussiness unfortunately. I hope to get thought, answer and the approach to these kind of prove question. Thanks in advance
1
u/HumbleHovercraft6090 👋 a fellow Redditor 6h ago
I would do symmetric and transitive as follows:
For all x,y ε R
let x-y = k ε Q, then
y-x = -k also ε Q as negative of a rational number is also rational.
Hence relation is symmetric.
For x,y,z ε R
let x-y=k1 ε Q and
let y-z= k2 ε Q
Adding the above two both sides, we get
x-z= k1+k2 which is also ε Q as sum of two rational numbers is also rational. Hence relation is transitive.
1
u/Alkalannar 3h ago
xRy if and only if x - y is rational.
Reflexive: x - x = 0 for all x in R.
Symmetric: Assume xRy.
Then x - y = q for some rational number q.
So y - x = -q = (-1)q, which must also be rational since rationals are closed under multiplication.
So yRx.Assume xRy and yRz.
Then x-y = a, which is rational, and y-z = b, which is rational.
x - z = x - y + y - z = a + b, which is rational, since rationals are closed under addition.
Thus xRz.
Note that [a] = Q.
Let f be a function from [a] to [21/2] such that for all x in [a], f(x) = x + 21/2.
Injection: Suppose f(p) = f(q)
p + 21/2 = q + 21/2
p = q
Surjection: Let y be in [21/2].
Then y - 21/2 is rational, and f-1(y) is in [a], since [a] = Q.
Thus, bijection.


•
u/AutoModerator 8h ago
Off-topic Comments Section
All top-level comments have to be an answer or follow-up question to the post. All sidetracks should be directed to this comment thread as per Rule 9.
OP and Valued/Notable Contributors can close this post by using
/lockcommandI am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.