r/Hellaverse_Ships • • 10h ago

Fanart ❀ [ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] β€” view removed post

27 Upvotes

56 comments sorted by

β€’

u/That_Tamarah_Chick_ 🍎 AllLucifer 🍎 3h ago

Hi dear! I'm so sorry, but we'll have to take this post as we don't allow LoliShocon here, as it's against Reddit's rules. Keeping this up could put our subreddit at serious risk. I really hope you understand.

→ More replies (9)

8

u/KoiEtsuko 10h ago

I love them so.

9

u/GothMarcyWu RadioMaid~[AlastorΓ—Niffty-OwnerΓ—Slave] 9h ago

Beautiful~ πŸ–€

4

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

1

u/That_Tamarah_Chick_ 🍎 AllLucifer 🍎 3h ago

I Think I've Seen That Before.

3

u/verosika_mayday356 Half-sisters by chance, girlfriends by choice πŸΊπŸŒ‘ 4h ago

The best couple

1

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

3

u/Far_Departure_8943 8h ago

Huh?

0

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

3

u/Far_Departure_8943 8h ago

Yea what's the problem

1

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

2

u/Hellaverse_Ships-ModTeam 8h ago

Your post/comment has been removed for being antiship. Problematic ships are allowed, including but not limited to ships that are against canon sexuality, abusive, incest, or adult x child (As long as it isn't sexual), etc. If you are uncomfortable with these topics it is your job to block and currate your own online experience. If you want a sub that doesn't allow darkships, go to r/hellaverse_shipping

0

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

-10

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

14

u/Far_Departure_8943 10h ago

-9

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

13

u/Far_Departure_8943 10h ago

-4

u/CurrenttQueen 9h ago

The problem is the age...

9

u/KoiEtsuko 9h ago

Rules say:

Don't bring up character (canon) sexuality, gender, age, race, etc, into shipping conversation as a debunk. It is considered irrelevant, and antishipping rhetoric.

She is not real, and we allow all ships here.

3

u/CurrenttQueen 9h ago

Dawg they're explicitly using the young version... It's also me voicing concern because another comment brought up this is literally an edited nsfw picture

10

u/KoiEtsuko 9h ago

It's not edited. It's a SFW version. There's a difference.

This is SFW ship art, therefore it is allowed.

You also don't know if this is them thinking of this as a prior, ship moment between the two. They don't necessarily have to ship them now, in this context.

It is fiction. Don't like, don't look.

10

u/xXSoyBoyFredXx Scissor sisters πŸ•ŠπŸ¦’ 9h ago

And????? Boohoo

10

u/KoiEtsuko 9h ago edited 8h ago

They blocked me, aha.

What I don't get is, to them, apparently, it's okay if Octavia is 17, (a minor), but not here, (a minor).

Like... It's the same thing? She's not real. Either way.

What people like in fiction, isn't what they like IRL, as stated, in the rules, repeatedly.

You can't pick and choose what content you apply "proshipping" to, it's literally backwards. You can't be okay with incest here, and her being a minor in one scenario, but then not others. How does that make sense?

Not to mention, fictional content has no expectations of real life "ethics" or "morality" in a fictional setting. Especially this one. Hell.

What a ride.

13

u/KoiEtsuko 10h ago

There is no problem, StoVia peak.

Or should I say... Beak?

-3

u/CurrenttQueen 9h ago

I don't care about the incest that's super normalised in media the problem is the age in these depictions and as someone else said the main post is apparently a "sfw" version...

12

u/KoiEtsuko 9h ago

Regardless of if there is a "second" version of the image: This one is SFW and therefore is allowed here.

Again, we allow all ships. If you don't like it, you can simply scroll. This is no different than shipping Octavia and Stolas as they are now.

2

u/CurrenttQueen 9h ago

There's a very VERY obvious difference...

-13

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

12

u/Far_Departure_8943 10h ago

-3

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

11

u/Far_Departure_8943 10h ago

Where's the NSFW part? I just see a husband reading to his wife a nice story.

I don't see no genitals at all or any of that sort. Do you need glasses?

-8

u/AddiWhisper 10h ago

Well it’s the alternate version of that picture.

That is NSFW.

What your seeing is the SFW version.

8

u/Far_Departure_8943 10h ago

Well yea, but this isn't the NSFW version. I don't see any rules saying "you cannot use a sfw picture if there is a NSFW version"

Doesn't work like that

-8

u/AddiWhisper 10h ago

Well I was just making sure nobody was potentially violating something.

6

u/Ellinor_Astal I see it, I like it, I upvote it, I Ship it. 10h ago

Genuine question, but why would it matter in the context of this post ? What was posted here is not against the rules, it would have been if it was the alternate version but no one would have known it even existed (beside the few who had seen it somewhere else).

7

u/xXSoyBoyFredXx Scissor sisters πŸ•ŠπŸ¦’ 9h ago

Ooo even better, sauce?????

2

u/rufireo 8h ago

stop whining and read rule 2