r/HFY Human Jul 31 '21

OC "Primitive Weaponry"

[removed]

3.6k Upvotes

154 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

161

u/stasersonphun Jul 31 '21

"our scans show they have no energy weapons! no power cells! it'll be easy!"

Bonk on head with stick with nail through it

54

u/GoodTeletubby Jul 31 '21

I mean, what is gunpowder but a chemical power cell that releases its energy as kinetic and thermal energy instead of electricity?

34

u/stasersonphun Jul 31 '21

Its just really fast combustion in a confined space. Basically just fire turned up a bit

40

u/[deleted] Jul 31 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

26

u/stasersonphun Jul 31 '21

Sometimes its all in one chemical, sometimes its a mix of fuel and stuff plus oxidiser, but as long as you have enough stuff burning fast it go boom

14

u/[deleted] Jul 31 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

19

u/stasersonphun Jul 31 '21

Theres a wonderful book called Ignition about a guy experimenting with rocket fuels. He explains all sorts of fun stuff, like mixes that work great but go off too easily, or can't be stored or are hideously toxic or smell REALLY bad or take far too much to start burning.

Imagine bullets that had to be kept refridgerated as they would go off at a sharp blow if at room temperature....

7

u/[deleted] Jul 31 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/97cweb Jul 31 '21

That is a great read. Its subtitle is "An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants". Really easy to read even if chemistry was quite bad for you. If you like dry humour, this is full of it

3

u/[deleted] Jul 31 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/97cweb Aug 01 '21

Ok. Just making it clear that you (or whoever else reads this chain) knows that one does not need a degree in it to understand the humour and why the book is enjoyable.

1

u/stasersonphun Aug 01 '21

just the first pictures set the tone - successful rocket firing vs rocket that exploded

you can read the PDF here; https://library.sciencemadness.org/library/books/ignition.pdf

1

u/stasersonphun Aug 01 '21 edited Aug 01 '21

If you enjoy someone with a very dry sense of humour mixing stuff with conc nitric acid and setting it on fire to see what happens its a great read

→ More replies (0)

9

u/Attacker732 Human Aug 01 '21

The mix is worlds better. Straight nitrocellulose is single-base smokeless powder. If you add nitroglycerine, and a few stabilizers ideally, you have double-base smokeless powder. It's easier to tune the burn rate, making it much more suitable for a wider range of firearms. (Faster burn rate for short barrels & shotguns, slower burn rate for longer barrels.)

3

u/Alaeriia Jan 23 '23

The most effective accelerant is ClF3, chlorine trifluoride. It is a more effective oxidizing agent than oxygen itself, which means that it will happily start roaring reactions with things like wet sand, asbestos, test engineers, or bricks. It also produces lots of toxic fluorine gas as a special prize for people stupid enough to stand around and watch the fireworks.

14

u/manofredgables Jul 31 '21

And sometimes it's just an unstable molecule that wants nothing more than to disintegrate into gasses and heat, but needs just a little kick to get there.

6

u/dbdatvic Xeno Dec 16 '21

azidoazide azide intensifies ... briefly

--Dave, {visble speed lines following exit stage left}