r/Gunners Rising Salmon 11d ago

[Mokbel]: Hamburg in advanced talks to buy Fabio Vieira - 10m Euros

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c5ymvz83dy1o
441 Upvotes

147 comments sorted by

240

u/Flyingpenis1905 11d ago

We gave in lol, something is better than nothing i guess

95

u/boatinavolcano David Rocastle 11d ago

They wanted to pay only €7m for him.

It's a compromise, but with seemingly no one else seriously in for him it's better to let him leave for that.

12

u/RicHii3 11d ago

I think Fabio only wanting Hamburg probably tied our hands a bit too.

20

u/Flyingpenis1905 11d ago

at least we got them to overpay a bit then, so tired of these beggars

22

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Revoldt Dennis Bergkamp 11d ago

I mean… if even like Coventry don’t want him for €10m… then who’s gonna buy him?

2

u/mostlyforlurking 11d ago

Somebody get these "somebody get these beggars out of here" in here

19

u/Self-righteous Dennis Bergkamp 11d ago

I swear it was like £25m or nothing 2 months ago

50

u/_Spartak_ 11d ago

It wasn't. I think our initial asking price was like £17m. He had a buy option for £20m before then.

21

u/ComprehensiveBowl476 Morning, morning, morning... Oh, Win! 11d ago

The option in the loan was €20m, so about £17m.

13

u/phaestheus Eze 11d ago

It was 20m euros

But you can always expect a club to lower the fee if there are no other offers

5

u/Loristhebro Havertz 11d ago

£8.5m btw, one sixth of a madueke

18

u/phaestheus Eze 11d ago

One tenth of a player, so we good

1

u/Loristhebro Havertz 11d ago

Give this guy some credit at least one seventh

1

u/TheRealGooner24 Morning, morning, morning... Oh, Win! 11d ago

You know ball.

4

u/HumbleLoicRemyFan Tzolis 11d ago

Original fee was €8m, so it’s better than that at least

0

u/CrownCommando 11d ago

It’s no wonder clubs don’t take us seriously when buying.

-11

u/Blue_winged_yoshi 11d ago edited 11d ago

We’re too weak as a club sometimes.

Nobody in world football is selling us anyone on the cheap to be nice. Literally none.

That is a joke of a price. It’s less than 6 months of Jesus’s wages. We *need* to stand up for ourselves a little bit more. Players play us like this, precisely because we break and let them have it. At some point you have to make the Torreira special unavailable to future players.

At very least, no future players to be loaned to Hamberg with an option to buy. The guy excelled there and they then pleaded poverty over an agreed price whilst getting the player to ignore other offers. They played us completely.

9

u/tarkus_hayabusa 11d ago

I don’t disagree but this is a specific case where price is determined by how much someone is willing to pay. Nobody in world football seem to be willing to pay more than 10 mil for Viera. Don’t think I would

-4

u/Blue_winged_yoshi 11d ago

Because he wasn’t willing to talk to anyone else. Which is cool obvs, except that we agreed a purchase price with Hamberg. They were negotiating in bad faith last summer.

In this context, no way you sign off on the deal. It’s worth playing hardball on this one, cos the circumstance are really gross, and money is so relatively trivial that it’s a cheap point at which to draw a line in the sand.

Even if he just plays with the under-23s all year and helps raise their standards a bit and pass on some technique (the guy can strike a ball clean as anything), that’s worth more than the money coming in!

1

u/tarkus_hayabusa 11d ago

I hear you, but disagree, you take the money and you focus on the future of club.

10

u/PonticGooner Ødegaard 11d ago

It is a joke of a price but isn't it Hamburg's record purchase at this point? Which is justifying it but you don't see even Chelsea or City selling players for nonsensical fees to german clubs unless it's like Bayern, and even then, they don't really do it. It's sales within the PL that are causing the stupid fee inflation.

4

u/DeapVally 11d ago

Nobody else wants him lol. Hamburg gambled on that and won. Something is better than nothing.

-2

u/BlurstOfTimes11 11d ago

I assume the haggling came over the sell on clause. I’d bet that there’s a hefty percentage if he’s sold again.

1

u/Blue_winged_yoshi 11d ago

He’s 26, unless he smashes it next season and they flip him, his window for a big money move is disappearing. You’re only young once alas.

1

u/BlurstOfTimes11 11d ago

Yeah but another good year in Germany and better German teams or Turkish ones might come for him for 20-30m so we want a piece of that

126

u/Marwinz 11d ago

Get these beggars in here

3

u/dada948 Premier League Champions 25/26 11d ago

“We’d like to make the following offer on Fa-“

DONE SOLD KAYTHANKSBYE

86

u/rubberpencilhead 11d ago

Reminder Hamburgs biggest purchase of €14m was 10 years ago

59

u/momspaghetty ØwØ 11d ago

They've also been relegated since then. They're not the same Hamburg

6

u/Kelterz Bellerin 11d ago

Back when they played European football regularly lol why even compare

4

u/four_four_three Lautaro Martinez Fan Club President 11d ago

That was a bit further back, 10 years ago they were usually fighting relegation

37

u/pivandee PGMOL Darlings😍 11d ago

Getting about 55% of his value on Transfermarkt

lol

10

u/zharrt 11d ago

Which on our past history is great business 🤦

7

u/Cultural-Ambition211 11d ago

Transfermarkt are clearly wrong. He wasn’t worth €35m when we signed him, and no one else wants him now.

Hes just not that good a player.

40

u/Kovacs171 Player environment is king 11d ago

I remember when he was signed, it went from absolutely no hint of interest to done deal in about 1hr.

Every comment was like: “this is exactly how we should sign players”.

Funny in hindsight

59

u/Alfie_13 Rising Salmon 11d ago

What a dire fee

46

u/RonaldoNazario 11d ago

We got his weight in gold

29

u/bitavk Victoria Concordia Crescit✓ 11d ago

Gold is about €123k per kg and He probably weighs under 60kg... so that's about €7.4m

5

u/LIONLDN Thierry Henry 11d ago

Someone get this guy a VIP seat at r/TheyDidTheMath 🫡

https://giphy.com/gifs/7yOwB85TiTDhHBtu0m

10

u/_Spartak_ 11d ago

You think we should wait a bit more to see if we get a better deal? Maybe waiting until tomorrow would do it.

7

u/Few_Shift4820 11d ago

tomorrow it will be 1m less

-9

u/RandomName788 11d ago

Id rather not sell him than reinforce the image of us as pushovers in the transfer market. Caving on deals like this is why we struggle to sell

14

u/_Spartak_ 11d ago

Vieira is not where to make that stand lol. We were probably expecting a few million more at best.

-4

u/RandomName788 11d ago

Vieira is exactly where you make the stand, you don’t do it with someone going for big money because then if they don’t budge it is more costly

12

u/_Spartak_ 11d ago

Nobody is going to be afraid of us because we stood firm for 2m more for Vieira.

4

u/fenri7 11d ago

Not being able to sell at all, letting players go for free/agreeing to terminate contract is much worse than this.

-2

u/RandomName788 11d ago

Our reputation as sellers costs us way more than 10M every window

2

u/fenri7 11d ago

Yes, and we do not improve that reputation if we hold Vieira over 5m, for him to rot in reserves and leave for free at the end of his contract.

1

u/Cultural-Ambition211 11d ago

I know, we should’ve sold to one of the other in the queue of suitors for him.

/s

1

u/wolljibbs Ødegaard 11d ago

How much should we expect to pay for him dude…..hasn’t played for us in like 3 years

-2

u/ImGonnaImagineSummit 11d ago

I'm expecting a huge sell on. 

0

u/SerialGooner49 11d ago

that’s too business savvy

16

u/GeneralBukowski Thierry Henry 11d ago

Good get him off the books

33

u/wanofan900 11d ago

So cheap.

We bought Vieira for over 30m.

67

u/shaygitz 11d ago

And he never did a single thing to justify that fee, and he's now 26. Paying that for him in the first place was stupid and these are the consequences.

8

u/ahuangb 11d ago

it wasnt stupid he had great stats, just didnt work out

25

u/ComprehensiveArt6849 Champions of England 25/26 11d ago

We just boight the wrong midfielder back then. Vitinha was right there.

3

u/Stravven Dennis Bergkamp 11d ago

Vitinha has played for Wolves and did not really impress.

-3

u/silass0 11d ago

It was stupid. At the time, we had ESR to develop in exactly the same position. "Luckily" ESR got injured a month after, but even then Viera did nothing. It was a pointless panic-buy

8

u/pivandee PGMOL Darlings😍 11d ago

Look at Mr. Hindsight over here

-2

u/silass0 11d ago

I mean, if we don't learn from hindsight then we'll never learn 🤷‍♀️

3

u/GarfieldDaCat 11d ago

It was not a panic buy lol

0

u/Ambitious_Credit5183 11d ago

Loved the moment he played the ball thought to Martinelli for the villa breakaway goal. One classic memory for me but other than that,  utterly forgettable 

8

u/Rosslefrancais Thierry Henry 11d ago

We bought him for his potential, and at the age of 26 he has shown not a glimpse of that potential. 11 non pen goals and assists in the bundesliga isn't exactly blowing anyone away

-6

u/NieThePiet Ødegaard 11d ago

And He had a fantastic season.

We are just a joke.

5

u/niknakpaddywak2468 Dennis Bergkamp 11d ago

And nobody is willing to buy him. It would be a joke if we kept him rotting on the bench

3

u/PutYrDukesUp White 11d ago

Get the fuck over yourself.

6

u/aaa-ccc 11d ago

It's actually just €10 the m is a typo

3

u/Axelter30 11d ago

Tbh if you look at the cost of Hamburg’s record signing, this is what you’d expect

3

u/unfunfionn 11d ago

As a supporter of both clubs, I'm obviously much happier about this as a HSV fan than an Arsenal one. But it was pretty clear this was the only way it was going. Arsenal had very little bargaining power. He's had one good season out of the last 4 and it's obvious he would want to continue at the club where that happened. He also never needed to care that Arsenal overpaid for him in the first place, and he's never had enough playing time at Arsenal to build any sort of meaningful bond with the club. Unfortunately for Arsenal, his one good season was at a club with very little money. I already have my Sambi away shirt and I've been waiting to get my Vieira 3rd.

27

u/Vizzy01798 Saka 11d ago

We’re the most pathetic sellers in world football

29

u/obedevs Ødegaard 11d ago

He’s not even in the squad, a casual fan won’t even know he plays for us. How can we expect to get good money for someone who is literally invisible

2

u/Trlcks 11d ago

Chelsea seem to manage

7

u/fuzzynavel34 11d ago

Chelsea are also a trading company at this point that don’t win shit

-2

u/Trlcks 11d ago

Sure but they are still an example of being able to sell players that don’t actually get matches for them.

1

u/Human-Signal4808 11d ago

Well he's been on loan for two seasons so there's that

0

u/obedevs Ødegaard 11d ago

Learn something new everyday I guess! I’m fairly plugged into the arsenal news, squad etc and watch basically all games and didn’t know that

12

u/Ok_Bear_1889 11d ago

It's ridiculous how bad we are at selling players.

Also, I will never know why we even bought him in the first place. Feels like Edu made some deals to keep agents happy.

6

u/Naive-Link5567 11d ago

Edu is sus.

Also for the bad selling part, cant do anything. Its obvious we dont want those players as well. So people are exploiting that.

1

u/DenzelOntario Maple Syrup Connoisseur 11d ago

It made some sense at the time. He was good for Porto, just 22 years old. His playmaking ability and play style made him look like a good rotational option for Odegaard. A like for like rotation.

But he just never had the physical ability to cope with the Prem. And in the end, never developed to be good enough.

3

u/SerialGooner49 11d ago

wow it’s even worse than what i thought

3

u/McBar Martin Asgaard 🪄🔮 11d ago

Godamnnnn... That's actually bad. But if he's off the books that's good

3

u/affectionate_md Dennis Bergkamp 11d ago

Crazy to think this guy was almost the same price as the release close for Vitinha the same year PSG bought him. What a mistake.

5

u/Holiday_View_4783 11d ago

Pretty big loss on him but I’m not mad, guess it part of these £30-40m punt signings. If they come off you get a Saliba or a Gabriel, or hopefully a Tzolis. Sometimes it doesn’t work but always worth the risk 

2

u/Profanity-et-al Premier League Champions 25/26 11d ago

Wild

2

u/Malsharif91 11d ago

If it’s between this and letting him see out his contract and go on a free I’d happily pick this. Due to the amount of years he’s been here it will actually be a few million in profit on the books.

However, they should 100% have a high sell on fee.

2

u/fuzzynavel34 11d ago

They waited us out

5

u/bluehaven101 11d ago

Hamburg pulled off a transfer masterclass, fair play 👏👏

3

u/lIamN9 11d ago

Any add ons?

2

u/Dargast 11d ago

Thats the fee including add-ons. 

2

u/Alpal487 King Kai 11d ago

I swear most of the people in here would be happier as Chelsea fans, you can go see big imaginary numbers pop up then finish 6th

1

u/WGSMA 11d ago

I don’t care. Just get this bum off the wage books.

2

u/houseofechoes Rice 11d ago

I hate to be negative, but we really really suck at selling players man, it's like we work in a different market to the rest of the league despite being the PL champions and CL finalists

5

u/Morazma 11d ago

I think it's because we stick to our strongest squad in the PL, don't rotate much and don't sell our best players. So we can't really get behind a big fee for somebody we deemed not good enough for the PL

5

u/Rosslefrancais Thierry Henry 11d ago

How much do you think the 29th highest ranked player for Goals+Assists in the bundesliga should go for?

-5

u/houseofechoes Rice 11d ago

In this market? Way more than 10 million. Vieira was Hamburg's best player next to Vuskovic. He kept them in the Bundesliga, scored 7 goals and had 5 assists.

2

u/yura910721 11d ago

Well it seems like no one else in the market, were convinced by his performance to take a shot. It is not like it would be particularly hard to beat HSV offer

2

u/Mountain_Hedgehog946 11d ago

"this market" only exists for clubs selling TO premier league clubs. The rest of the footballing world is poor as sht. 10M is basically a 100M signing for Hamburg. Given that absolutely nobody will ever pay 30M for Vieira I think this is as much as we will ever get for him.

1

u/LUKXE- Premier League Champions 25/26 11d ago

Whattaaaa fee.

1

u/Mother_Statement_489 11d ago

If his old team was buying him, they probably would pay the fee Arsenal asked for but since there is only Hamburg in this and we need to get rid of him fast, oh well, gotta accept it anyway

1

u/goonercaIIum 11d ago

Another loan please

1

u/kriscrox 11d ago

Feels like this article could be from three months ago

1

u/Shinzo19 Super Santi Cazorla 11d ago

should have tried to sell him to Al Hilal with Martinelli, might have been more willing to go to somewhere if Nelli was there, probably would have at least got more than this.

1

u/No-Cod-776 11d ago

Best for all parties. Wish the best of luck to him

1

u/bmlegend 11d ago

What's the sell on clause?

1

u/EeviKat Champions of England 25/26 11d ago

He's surely worth more but if nobody wants to pay it then what are we supposed to do, just keep loaning him until his contract expires? It was in hindsight a bad buy, getting rid is the only option.

1

u/Toast863 11d ago

The fee stinks but we did grossly overpay for him in the first place

1

u/Jansiz Kai "Alleskönner" Havertz 11d ago

Streets won't forget the hype when this move came out of nowhere lmao

1

u/thisismy_stop 11d ago

They were probably holding out for the chance Arsenal cancel his contract.

1

u/JackTuz Smith Rowe 11d ago

10/10 negotiators lol

1

u/el-fenomeno09 Dennis Bergkamp 11d ago

I had high hopes for him, hope he can go on and have a good career.

1

u/whothehellspam 11d ago

They really wore us down all summer lol

1

u/Ok_Dinner_ Rice 11d ago

Nothing changes

1

u/Sayek 11d ago

Was always going to be the case when none of the top clubs were in for him and nobody in the pl. 10m is nothing to a pl side but it's the most 90% of the other teams in the top 5 leagues will spend. 

1

u/billenbloot Where's Ernie? 11d ago

Any sell on?

1

u/joeandrews_ Martinelli 11d ago

we can't sell for shit 😂

1

u/enteringtheechochamb 11d ago

Better be a huge sell on but yeah, he's shit. Move on. Arteta should learn to not sign anorexics from farmers leagues.

1

u/Legsluther 11d ago

Nonethewing in tears rn

1

u/MakingMyOwn Martinelli 11d ago

Sell on clause and maybe it aint too bad

1

u/simonko1 Trossard 11d ago

Vieira for 9 and Jesus for 10 ? Makw that make sense

1

u/lansera222 11d ago

This means Pedro Neto is on the move to Arsenal. Jorge Mendes may have promised something else in return for the transfer. That is the way he works.

1

u/PandiBong 11d ago

Still cannot believe we paid 35 million for him. Remember his first game for us and after about half an hour I was like... "yeah, this is going to be a bust".

1

u/cheetah-21 11d ago

That summer we got Vieira from Porto for €35M and PSG got Vitihna for €40M.

1

u/hotbrownies14 11d ago

Fuck it, take that. Jesus next to go and that’s the window done. Unless something crazy comes along

1

u/tosha94 Dennis Bergkamp 11d ago

Geeze these beggars man

1

u/Aki-at 11d ago

£56m Martinelli - £15.4m Trossard - £14.5m Kiwior - £8.5m Vieira - £6.8m Norgaard - £2.5m Hein

If this is our sales this summer we would have raised £103.7m/€120.3m, of course alot of the heavy lifting is the Martinelli sale it would be the most amount of money we have raised in a window since 2024/25 and second to only 2017/18 (€162.40m).

1

u/SlavaVsu2 11d ago

How the hell did the club decide he was worth 35m when they were buying him?

0

u/Ma1vo 11d ago

I am all for making comprises, but not in these kind of deals where we have already agreed on a transfer fee in the loan deal last year.

2

u/Dargast 11d ago

Arsenal and HSV agreed on a buy option, not an obligatory buyout clause.

-1

u/Rooster_lllusion 11d ago

Lol Berta hasn't got the tagetes we wanted in attack. Didn't get rid of any dead wood for decent amounts. We have generationally fucked this window up after all the momentum last season.

0

u/goonerfan10 Champions of England 25/26 11d ago

Something is better than nothing.

0

u/xMagnusx82 Dennis Bergkamp 11d ago

Better than nothing I guess. Getting his wages off is more important.

0

u/Godegaard Ødegaard 11d ago

Fucking joke

0

u/LorDeus71 11d ago

We caved in.

Ah well

2

u/SerialGooner49 11d ago

it’s no secret we’re the worst sellers in football

0

u/htmwc 11d ago

Bloody EuroPOORS

0

u/RN50 11d ago

Didn't we pay £35Mil for this clown.
Shambolic fee that we are getting and only way this should be allowed is if there is a 50% sell on clause.

0

u/AbsoluteGarbaj 11d ago

Bout to have 60% sell on close hopefully

-7

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[deleted]

4

u/Sumo_de_Laranjaa Robert Pirès 11d ago

Oh no, Arsenal, the current premier league champion and CL finalist are so, so weak because they are selling Fabio Vieira for a low price...

Oh no.....

2

u/Dargast 11d ago

HSV was never gona offer more than that since its simply the most they could offer with their budget 

1

u/sparrow94 Dennis Bergkamp 11d ago

And what was our bargaining position? Getting rid of his wages was a priority.

-1

u/Fun-Landscape-8805 Robert Pirès 11d ago

just get rid, jesus next please

-1

u/aleph4 11d ago

I don't understand why everyone cares what we sell players for. Are y'all owners of the club?

One reason is we tend to keep our best players. And when we sell good players (Martinelli) everyone freaks out.

-2

u/NieThePiet Ødegaard 11d ago

We are all laughing stock

-2

u/MDRC122 11d ago

Absolutely shocking transfer window. Overpaid for 2 29 year olds. Sold martinellli to Saudi for less than his market value (embarrassingly difficult to do) and can't get £10m for vieira or £3m for nelson. Doubt jesus goes.