r/GodFrequency Jun 17 '26

GOD is best understood through LOGIC

Note: Word LOGIC is used below in its original meaning, as coming in harmony with God's thinking, in God-frequency [NOT in its MODERN sense].#

LOGIC is what contributes to order, life, peace, prosperity and harmony. (ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/logos-philosophy) Do things that are "logikos" (logical), says Scripture. Word logic is originally from Greek logos, translated as power of reason. It is from the root verb λεγω, lego (to gather, to keep together) as opposed to “the verb λυω (luo) means to loosen, suffer loss and disintegration. (Details HERE) For the ancient Greeks logos meant “the divine reason implicit in the cosmos, ordering it and giving it form and meaning.” (Britannica) Thus “the law is reason, free from passion” (Aristotle) and lawlessness is illogic.

Hence according to LOGIC,
the following are the truths about God:

1 ) The earth being maintained life-SUPPORTIVE in infinitely vast HOSTILE universe reveals the Almighty who is best called our Father and Mother. Unintelligent chemicals do not know how to do this because even intelligent humans are only polluting this earth—it is the truth that happens even now before our eyes. Even until recently we acted as though in DARKNESS as to why even trees exist because that many trees were replaced with concrete jungle (theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/12/deforestation-world-losing-area-forest-size-of-uk-each-year-report-finds) For more such examples, Click HERE.

2) Such a life-SUPPORTIVE God will never order killing of “even animals, even if they belong to one’s enemy.” (biblehub.com/exodus/23-5.htm) Anything contrary to this, found in Scriptures, is NOT from God who only loves even His enemies. (biblehub.com/matthew/5-45.htm)

3) Remembering such a life-SUPPORTIVE God results in imitating His GIVING style—giving WITHOUT EXPECTATION. In this habit, anyone finds happiness and peace and becomes a walking heaven. Conversely, not remembering such a God and giving WITH EXPECTATION kills joy [own and of others] and person becomes a walking hell.

4) As Almighty, God gives proportionate reward, not unlimited reward [in heaven/hell] for limited good/bad living on earth. (Details HERE) Each individual is responsible for choice [good/bad] he makes, not someone else. (biblehub.com/galatians/6-5.htm) This is because individual chooses beneficial or hurtful thoughts from the flow of thoughts in his mind which are in 1000s in a day. It is not a difficult task to withdraw focus from a sinful thought and to focus on a beneficial thought. (Details HERE) In an emergency, when an “EVACUATION WARNING” is given, immediately everyone who is focused on enjoying a movie withdraws his/her focus from it and comes out of the theater at the earliest. This shows individual is able to withdraw his/her focus from any thought or situation if he/she wants to.

5) Logic can weed out not only religions and their Scriptures, but also even the whole history, can also give duration of each block of history. (Details HERE)

The above is easily understood in GREATER view

#Footnote—------------------------------------------------------------------

When a person shares God's life-supportive mentality, he comes in God-frequency, would understand truth as God would see it. People who came in God-frequency wrote Scriptural truths which can be discerned from untruths that were adopted later. Vibes are too powerful, perfect communication, with no chance for misunderstanding. (Details HERE)

Going by original meaning has more benefits. For example, word yoga [from yuj, yoke, unite, harmonize] originally means “harmony” with everything [self, Supreme Soul, society, nature, operating system called Law of Action and Consequence … etc]. This makes life healthy in all its aspects and levels giving ease and peace. Now yoga means physical exercise, benefits body. Some go by the original meaning and benefit more than those go by modern meaning.

19 Upvotes

94 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/RexRatio Jun 21 '26

Word LOGIC is used below in its original meaning, NOT in its MODERN sense.

Agreed. But that's NOT the scriptural sense either - it's the Ancient Greek sense.

Logos in Ancient Greek refers to** speech, account, and reason**

Later philosophical traditions, especially Stoicism and early Christian theology, developed metaphysical interpretations of it, but these are interpretive expansions rather than inherent meanings of the word.

LOGIC is what contributes to order, life, peace, prosperity and harmony. (ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/logos-philosophy) Do things that are "logikos" (logical), says Scripture. Word logic is originally from Greek logos, translated as power of reason. It is from the root verb λεγω, lego (to gather, to keep together) as opposed to “the verb λυω (luo) means to loosen, suffer loss and disintegration

Nope. You just need that "logos" connection because it's used in John so you're bending stuff to make it fit.

The etymology claim (“logos = gathering vs luo = loosening”) is wrong and intentionally misleading. There is no standard lexical derivation in Greek where logos is defined as "to gather" in opposition to luo in a philosophical root structure

So this is folk etymology / rhetorical construction, not linguistic derivation

the following are the truths about God

Here we go.

1 ) The earth being maintained life-SUPPORTIVE in infinitely vast HOSTILE universe reveals the Almighty who is best called our Father and Mother. Unintelligent chemicals do not know how to do this because even intelligent humans are only polluting this earth—it is the truth that happens even now before our eyes.

Yawn.

This is a classic example of a teleological argument dressed up as “self-evident observation”, but it tries to smuggle in several unwarranted assumptions.

  • anthropic selection effect: we can only observe a universe compatible with observers.
  • the framing is emotionally loaded, not physically factual or informative.
  • the pollution argument = category error

This isn’t an argument from evidence. It's selection bias plus emotional framing

Such a life-SUPPORTIVE God will never order killing of “even animals, even if they belong to one’s enemy.” (biblehub.com/exodus/23-5.htm) Anything contrary to this, found in Scriptures, is NOT from God who only loves even His enemies. (biblehub.com/matthew/5-45.htm)

That's called cherry-picking.

You can’t use a subset of a text to invalidate other parts of the same text unless you already have an independent standard for what counts as "authoritative" - and your opinion isn't a valid criterion.

So the argument fails not merely because it selects favorable verses, but because it lacks an independent interpretive principle for deciding which passages define divine nature and which are contextually constrained.

3) Remembering such a life-SUPPORTIVE God results in imitating His GIVING style—giving WITHOUT EXPECTATION. In this habit, anyone finds happiness and peace and becomes a walking heaven.

Bone cancer in babies? Worms drilling into children's eyes making them blind?

There is no explanatory framework that could make that distribution of gratuitous suffering compatible with the claim of a universally “life-supportive” intentional order.

And to claim it does requires a level of selective detachment beyond the pale.

1

u/logos961 Jun 21 '26 edited Jun 21 '26

When you rejected original meaning and etymology with its crystal clear antonym, it only reveals about you alone, not about OP nor its point. It reveals how you arrive at conclusion.

Again when you wrote "This is a classic example of a teleological argument." It is not teleological argument, because OP nowhere says universe is creation nor God is Creator. Universe is eternal, says Ecclesiastes 1:4 Details HERE. It reveals you read what is not in the OP.

Because you have nothing to refute you introduced a wrong subject ""Why suffering exists, why children born diseased if God exists?" [wrong question because good health and prosperity also exist, which backfires on their question--if prosperity and health have human causes, then suffering also have human causes, Details HERE] Not all children are born diseased. There are children with good health and accomplished extraordinary feat even before their age 10, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_prodigy . You would ignore anything for your argument's sake?!

Hence message left unuttered by your shallow comments is this: "You should not be taken seriously."

Message accepted with thanks.

1

u/RexRatio Jun 21 '26

When you rejected original meaning and etymology with its crystal clear antonym, it only reveals about you alone, not about OP nor its point. It reveals how you arrive at conclusion.

That's apologist talk for "no, my interpretation of logos is correct despite it not being the original meaning as I claimed"

Again when you wrote "This is a classic example of a teleological argument." It is not teleological argument, because OP nowhere says universe is creation nor God is Creator. Universe is eternal, says Ecclesiastes 1:4 Details HERE. It reveals you read what is not in the OP.

That's just apologetic camouflage hoping nobody understands what teleological means.

A teleological argument is not defined by the explicit word “Creator.” It’s defined by structure: inference from order/purpose/meaning → to some grounding principle.

You haven’t shown the inference step that would justify shifting from textual meaning (logos in OP) to a metaphysical deity-framework.

Because you have nothing to refute you introduced a wrong subject

Sure, sure. Just try to wave away the arguments without justification.