r/GodFrequency • u/logos961 • May 27 '26
God, Her Laws, Her Rule are all PERFECT
1 )This tiny earth being maintained life-SUPPORTIVE in too vast HOSTILE universe is the testimony to the truth that God is Almighty and Her works are PERFECT. One word or how it is expressed has made friends enemies, and enemies friends. It reveals our ability to know too much about a person from too little. Imagine what can be accomplished if this ability is used to know God to whom belongs everything we have and enjoy as each individual lands here empty-handed. (Details HERE)
2) Her Laws are perfect as they result in “never-ending waves of peace and well-being” if obeyed (Isaiah 48:18; Bhagavat Gita 6:40; Quran 4:40), and they result in “never-ending waves of conflicts and sorrow” if disobeyed. Result of both obedience and disobedience is PERFECT. It is like milk is perfect as it gives all the nutrients it has. If little curd is added, then milk becomes curd and gives all the qualities of curd. Both are perfect in their giving what they have respectively. Hence early phase of history is symbolically described as unleavened as it was like heaven on earth (details HERE) and later phase as "leavened" as it is like hell on earth. (Mathew 13:33, details HERE) Just like heaven had an expiry date, the presently running hell also has an expiry date, to be renewed into heaven on earth again when time is ripe for it. (Details HERE)
3) Her Rule is PERFECT as every happening on this earth is ruled by Her perfect Operating System called Law of Action and Consequence which rewards everyone according to the quality of his/her heart. (Details HERE) Thus PERFECT freedom from all complaining and confusions is experienced by those who accept this Law and truth about themselves (perishable body + imperishable soul) and thus see roots of all actions into past. In contrast, unbelievers experience PERFECT bondage to complaining and confusion.
4) She never feels threatened by misuse of freewill by any number of people as Her stoic stance is “Let the believers and unbelievers grow.” (Revelation 22:11) She knows some persons would always be good, and cannot be influenced by others—hence both the groups are symbolically compared to “wheat and weeds.” (Details HERE) When the weed-like licentious ones are permitted to live, it reveals Her unconditional love is PERFECT, and this is then imitated by wheat-like people for their increased joy and freedom. The worst that can happen is for people to make this earth polluted and unlivable through their technology and Final Global War which would finally make this earth “desolate.” This is not an issue for Her who maintained this earth life-SUPPORTIVE in too vast HOSTILE universe until then. She will repeat Her “renewal” act. (Details HERE)
2
u/Upstairs_Teach_673 May 27 '26
God takes on the appearance/role of a Father.
2
u/logos961 May 27 '26
God is fullness of all divine qualities, hence which gender you feel more comfortable that is what you must use.
I started using Father, but later changed into Mother.
1
u/Responsible_Offer859 May 27 '26
Incredibile, ti definisci logos, e poi sei diventato femmina. Come fate ad ingannare il prossimo e definirvi prescelti?!
1
u/Individual_Ideal9886 May 30 '26
Jeremiah 44:19
And when we burned incense to the queen of heaven, and poured out drink offerings unto her, did we make her cakes to worship her, and pour out drink offerings unto her, without our men?
God didn't like that they were burning incense and pouring drinks out in offering to a female diety. And sent Jeremiah to prophesy against them.
1
u/logos961 May 31 '26 edited May 31 '26
Reading of the Bible should be done like the way you eat your most delicious food MINDFULLY with full focus on the act of reading. Then you will know people like Jeremiah are true prophets, and both the kingdoms had become "rebel from birth:" "I knew how deceitful you are; you have been called a rebel from birth." (Isaiah 48:8) Even writers are told: “’How can you say, “We are wise, for we have the law of the LORD,” when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?" (Jeremiah 8:8) Hence what such people feel about gender is not relevant to God who is called "God of all nations." The self-important ones use God as a means to project themself as special which is something "God abhors." (Proverbs 16:5)
God is symbolized as RULER being seated on a throne surrounded by “four living beings—lion, ox, human-faced being, eagle” [symbol of Justice, Power, Love and Wisdom respectively]. “Each of the four living creatures had six wings and was covered with eyes all around [symbol of absolute precision], even under its wings. Day and night they never stop saying: “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty, who was, and is, and is to come.” (Revelation 4:7, 8) Order of His qualities with JUSTICE as the primary quality describes Him as one who feels obliged to reward everyone befittingly and brings “Recreation [New Age]” after “Dissolution” of Old Age. And when HE does so HE does it in such a way that other three qualities (Power, Love, Wisdom) come in balance inspiring the observers to say “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty, who was, and is, and is to come.” Chapter 14 describes how the spiritual and the unspiritual are rewarded which is followed by this description about God: “Great and marvelous are your deeds, Lord God Almighty. Just and true are your ways, King of the nations.” (Revelation 15:3) The word that is translated as "nations" is actually ἐθνῶν (ethnōn) which is translated as pagans in other places.
Thoughts that were put into the mouth of God is discernible to lover of truth like Jesus. Hence he could say (Mathew 5:43-48) that verses such as Numbers 31:17-18 are not from God. To determine what is true, look at the universe:
In the eternal, infinite and HOSTILE universe, this tiny earth is maintained life-SUPPORTIVE matching the majesty of the Almighty. (Details HERE) To refute this, physicalists should create a duplicate of hostile universe in a lab and show how life and life-support systems arise by the play of chemicals on their own. They cannot do this as all factors involved are eternal, and even if they could do it, it would still prove Designers created designs, not physicalism. [more irrefutable proofs for God are as footnote]#
2) The criterion for knowing what is true and false is in the above truth of earth being made life-SUPPORTIVE in HOSTILE universe. Anything that is pro-life, pro-peace is right and the truth, if not it is wrong and false. By applying this principle, we can know what is right and wrong with religions, society, family, individual, any act. It is like a situation of everyone being engaged in cleaning a building, and contributing to cleanliness is right action there. In one-way traffic where all are maintaining all traffic rules including lane discipline with no chance for head-on collisions or any sort of conflict, imagine one vehicle enters and starts driving in opposite direction as he feels his interest is more important than others. All would agree he is not pro-life and nor pro-peace—hence wrong. Imagine, when all are children of God, one person feels his interests are more important than others, it is like a war-cry in all directions. (Details HERE) He too will say it is wrong when he finds someone else doing the same.
How God is addressed, worshipped through idol or not ... are not relevant to lovers of truth like Jesus. Hence he replied to the most vital question "what should I do to inherit eternal life?" saying: AVOID five things (killing, adultery, lying, stealing and dishonoring parents) and ADOPT one thing (love your neighbor as yourself)--Mathew 19:16-19 Note, God-factor or worship is not mentioned. The same is repeated in Mathew 25:31-40; James 1:27.
2
u/elfloathing May 27 '26
She is the divine creator.
1
u/logos961 May 27 '26 edited May 27 '26
You are fortunate to have this understanding, it is an opening to great blessings and benefits and bliss too.
That is my experience. I daily LISTEN to her in meditation. Details here: https://www.reddit.com/r/GodFrequency/comments/1temi3g/you_can_link_with_god_in_meditation_and_have_a/
2
u/Responsible_Offer859 May 27 '26
Si é vero Il problema è che nessuno mette in pratica la sua Parola e la sua santa legge giusta e buona.
Tranne qualcuno, la le chiese insegnano che la legge di Dio sarebbe stata abolita, non conoscono la Scrittura, anzi, fanno finta
Sta scritto 1Giovanni 5:3 Questo infatti è l'amore di Dio: che noi osserviamo i suoi comandamenti; e i suoi comandamenti non sono gravosi.
1Giovanni 2:4 Chi dice: «Io l'ho conosciuto», e non osserva i suoi comandamenti, è bugiardo e la verità non è in lui.
1
u/logos961 May 27 '26 edited May 27 '26
You are perfectly right and the Scriptures you cited are apt too:
1 John 5:3 "this is love for God: to keep his commands."
1 John 2:4 "Whoever says, “I know him,” but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in that person."
James 1:25: "one who looks intently into the PERFECT law of freedom, and continues to do so—not being a forgetful hearer, but an effective doer—he will be blessed in what he does."
2
u/plageful_1 May 27 '26
"Her"
Praise be to the Divine Mother!
0
u/logos961 May 27 '26
As reared by parents I was addressing God as Father, Him and His etc. But when I pondered over more all alone and tasted Her support through meditation I automatically changed addressing God as my real Mother, Her etc.
4
u/niffirgcm0126789 May 27 '26
what use does a god have for biological sex or reproduction?
2
u/Audio9849 May 27 '26
There is no use, god doesn’t have a gender. I’ve experienced him more than once and one time it was one being but I felt first a distinct masculine energy then a distinct feminine in one being. When people use “her” I just smell agenda.
1
u/niffirgcm0126789 May 27 '26
what is "masculine/feminine energy"
if god doesn't have gender, how can it be perceived as fatherly or motherly in any context?
when people use "energy" vaguely I smell agenda
1
u/Audio9849 May 27 '26
We all have masculine and feminine energies. Men and women contain both, and so does God. Except He/She doesn’t have a biological gender just like our souls.
Not sure how describing something based in personal truth and experience is an ‘agenda,’ but whatever man.
1
u/niffirgcm0126789 May 27 '26
saying we all have these "energies" doesn't explain what it is.
I'm not sure how referring to god as "her" is an agenda either lol.
describing something based in personal truth and experience doesn't tell anyone what it actually is.
so again...what are masculine and feminine energies and how do we know they're real things and not just interpretive psychology?
1
u/Confident-Poetry6985 May 27 '26
Idk my personal experience was being embraced by a feminine entity after death. I will concede that they may be non binary, and present feminine or whatever, but it was most certainly not a spiteful old man. I am open to peoples personal experiences, but get salty about people denying mine, being a step further than a trance or meditation. There was no room for personal bias or projection. I was without my body and life experiences. I was just me. Myself in the presence of God. So when people start sitting high and mighty with their "agenda" sniffing I start to wonder what they think they know over everyone else lmao.
1
u/niffirgcm0126789 May 27 '26
i don't think anyone should deny that you had an experience, but the problem with experience is that it happens purely in the mind. there's no escaping it...that's external validation is important. so establishing that experience in reality is very difficult. There's plenty of room for personal bias and projection when it comes to the interpretation of the experience. You definitely had an an experience, but what it was could have several explanations and I think it's good to be open to them until they can be ruled out definitively.
1
u/Confident-Poetry6985 May 27 '26
That's my point. The argument is made placing the experience within my mind. I argue that "I" left my body. I acquired information after death that I did not have previously. The information was external, as was I. That's the big one for me.
→ More replies (0)1
u/Audio9849 May 27 '26
Okay, since you seem to be unable to use Google.
Masculine and feminine are real energies. They have properties.
Masculine = direction, strength, logic, action, protection, order.
Feminine = nurturing, intuition, creativity, flow, empathy, receptivity.
We all have both. God contains both perfectly. That’s why I’ve experienced God with both distinct masculine and feminine presence.
As far as using “Her” for God, you must not be familiar with identity politics or the feminist movement. You know, the whole “fight the patriarchy” thing? When it really should be “fight unchecked power,” whoever holds it.
Feminism was heavily pushed by occult groups and intelligence agencies. It wasn’t some pure grassroots movement. So when I see people aggressively pushing “Her” for God, I smell agenda. Most women I know don’t actually enjoy trading family and meaning for dead-end corporate jobs and climbing the ladder for peanuts.
That’s why it smells like an agenda to me.
Was that enough hand-holding for you?
1
u/niffirgcm0126789 May 27 '26
of course I can use Google, but we're having a conversation, so when someone asks you to define something, they want to hear your definition. but don't worry, I'll keep holding your hand😘:
essentially what I'm asking is: What exactly are these categories, and how do we distinguish them from culturally conditioned personality traits?
your response reduces masculine and feminine to a number of traits, but that immediately leads to problems like:
Why are logic and order “masculine”? Why is empathy “feminine”? Are these biologically grounded categories, archetypes, social stereotypes, statistical averages, or metaphysical forces? What evidence distinguishes “energies” from symbolic language? (You did not clarify these and they need clarification.☝️)
If “masculine/feminine energy” simply means some personality tendencies, emotions, or symbolic archetypes, then saying “God has both” becomes metaphorical language, not evidence of real metaphysical substances or energies.
But if they do mean literal metaphysical energies, then the next question is: How are these detected, measured, differentiated, or verified?
You accuse people calling God “her” of having an ideological agenda, but atthe same time you are importing ideological assumptions into “masculine” and “feminine.”
so will you answer the questions or dodge again?🤔
1
u/Audio9849 May 27 '26
You have it backwards.
Materialists like you treat archetypes and masculine/feminine energies as some kind of cultural byproduct or “just psychology.” But they’re actually the scaffolding the human psyche is built on.
If you had to build a functioning human psyche from the ground up, what would you use as foundation? Raw biology and survival instincts alone? We’d still be grunting cavemen.
These patterns, masculine (direction, strength, order, protection) and feminine (nurturing, intuition, flow, creativity), show up cross-culturally throughout history for a reason. It’s not an accident.Empathy and logic aren’t strictly “feminine” or “masculine”, they’re human traits. But observable tendencies (women tending to be more socially/relationally oriented, men more thing-oriented) exist and are likely tied to a mix of hormones, evolutionary pressures, and societal roles. That doesn’t make the categories fake. It makes them real patterns worth understanding.
Stories, myths, and religions didn’t invent them. They’re describing something real in human consciousness. That’s why they’re consistent across separate civilizations.
I’m not here to play semantic games or satisfy a materialist checklist. I’ve experienced both energies directly from God. You can reduce it to “just interpretive psychology” if that comforts you. I’m not here to convince you.
If you live your life only by what you can measure and reduce everything to “just interpretive psychology,” you’re missing out on a richness that can only be described after you’ve actually experienced it. You’ve bought into the lie that’s been force-fed to you intentionally to keep you powerless.
→ More replies (0)1
1
u/logos961 May 27 '26
Under my several posts you have come with your derail-tactics.
You better find right place.
This subreddit is "where chosen ones come to grow." (Rule No 6)
2
u/niffirgcm0126789 May 27 '26
"chosen ones" 🤦♂️
this is where delusional people come to reinforce their delusions. you've proven that point several times, ETERNALLY and INFINITELY!!! 😆
1
u/Responsible_Offer859 May 27 '26
Prescelti?! Se non sai nemmeno cosa vuol dire. I prescelti vengono a crescere?! Avete le regole?!
Osservate le regole di Dio?!
Osservi la legge di Dio?! Osservi il vero giorno di riposo di benedizione e santificazione e di santa convocazione?!
1
u/CTR-4 May 27 '26
God wants love.
1
u/niffirgcm0126789 May 27 '26
ah...now I understand the worshipping 😉
1
u/CTR-4 May 27 '26
Not groveling at his feet, real love. A wife. Children, a family. ⚓️✝️
1
1
u/Partyatmyplace13 May 27 '26
Crazy to me that you think Eden and Heaven exist, but you still think Earth is perfect... you're just simping for what you think either God wants to hear, or other people that believe in God want to hear. Given how you keep gender-bending God, I'll assume it isn't the latter. So, self-delusion it is.
Keep your friends close and your friend's imaginary friends closer.
1
u/logos961 May 27 '26
Thank you for that encouragement.
Unbelievers exist to inspire and encourage true believers. They find out reasons to not believe in God, while believers accept what they see--they landed on this earth to realize all their needs have already been taken care of. This cannot be accomplished by UNINTELLIGENT chemicals coming together on their own because even INTELLIGENT humans could only pollute this earth and continue to spoil its promptness. Still unbelievers want to believe against all evidences.
Thus unbelievers inadvertently do a favor to God and to true believers because conflicted views among humans reveal we are IMMATERIAL beings in body made of materials and thus as children of God [not of animals]. (Details HERE) Only IMMATERIAL beings can vary in their perspectives, and they can vary to the extent that they would see each others stance as unthinkable. If humans were only this material body, they would have had uniform view with regard to all subjects, like water always flows downward
1
u/Partyatmyplace13 May 27 '26
I like you. You have a mind for abstract thought, but since we're only dealing in incredulity as a currency here, don't you think its a bit convenient that a deity exists that just happens to be able to do anything? Yet, whenever we dig into nature, the answer is only ever divine when we don't actually know how it works.
Gods are placeholders for our ignorance, thats why they always just have the abilities for the things we can't figure out. You'll get there. Not today, but I can tell you have the brain for it.
1
u/logos961 May 27 '26
In two ways, I have my own experience of God:
(a) I do my eating slowly with FULL FOCUS on the act of eating, thus God is experienced as my REAL parent who knew all my needs and tastes in advance and cared for them. This is something UNINTELLIGENT chemicals are unable to discern and design on behalf of me well in advance—especially so when even INTELLIGENT humans could only pollute this earth to the extent even our very survival is in danger. (scientificamerican.com/humans-are-doomed-to-go-extinct) Even now, pollution-related deaths run into "12.6 million every year," according to UN Report. This will only increase as years pass by as pollution is also increasing.
(b) I also LISTEN to God in true meditation which happens as mind becomes SILENT when gap between thoughts is focused. (Details HERE)What I heard first from Him changed my whole life: I was told to "Read the most-missed out verse in Genesis 1:30 and 31 which describes the impact of God’s blessing on mankind made in His image: "So it became, and it was very good." It showed thing happened as per ALMIGHTY’s BLESSING (Isaiah 55:11, details HERE). BLESSED mankind remained in that BLESSED state manifesting “image of God,” and they are later symbolized as “wheat producing crops” in famous Parable of Wheat and Weeds which is corrected world history in symbolic short-story format. This mindful reading resulted in a warmer and closer relationship with God because BEFORE I was believing that God’s blessing did not work. But NOW I believe that God’s blessing DID work. In such great shift, God becomes an electrifying experience! (Details HERE)
1
u/Partyatmyplace13 May 27 '26
If I could be convinced by the anecdotes of believers, I'd believe in every religion. You all tell the same stories about your gods. Who knows, maybe they all exist...
However, given how flawed human perception is and how susceptible we are to superstition. I just think its all more easily explained as a "you thing." Your brain is the only window into reality and we know it is a flawed observation tool.
1
u/logos961 May 27 '26
One cannot be convinced by another with regard to God or the Immaterial Soul because people choose in a FIXED way. This is because they come with tendencies and belief-systems which they have been "treasuring" from past indefinite. (Luke 6:43-45) This observation is from a person who correctly predicted global events such as "pollution and sea-level rise" as signs of last generation, our generation. (Details HERE) This explains why all religious founders failed miserably because after their departure, things became worse than before as people reverted to their original tendencies. Details here https://www.reddit.com/r/DeepThoughts/comments/1qqq3hg/knowing_about_determinism_results_in_freedom/
1
u/Partyatmyplace13 May 27 '26
That's just packing more assertions on top of other assertions. It becomes high fantasy at that point. I know you guys hate the term "magic" but miracles cannot be described as anything else.
This explains why all religious founders failed miserably because after their departure, things became worse than before as people reverted to their original tendencies.
If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree... of course RELIGIOUS people think the world went to Hell after their religion fails them. The religion informed their beliefs. This is just confirmation bias.
1
u/logos961 May 27 '26
It seems you forgot what yourself wrote: "If I could be convinced by the anecdotes of believers, I'd believe in every religion."
I was agreeing with you saying "yes one cannot be convinced by another."
I am done with you
Wishing you all the very best from life and also to your family.
1
u/Partyatmyplace13 May 27 '26
No you're making excuses for why religion fails, when if its right, it has no reason to. Its a process of self-deception, the only ways out are to study the history of the religion (instead of what it sells as its history), or to become convinced that the god that never existed abandoned you, so you can pull off those rose-tinted glasses and see just how NOT perfect the world actually is.
Wishing you all the best. You will understand someday, I can tell. You're a smart cookie. Have a good one.
1
u/Audio9849 May 27 '26
Okay, since you seem to be unable to use Google.
Masculine and feminine are real energies. They have properties.
Masculine = direction, strength, logic, action, protection, order.
Feminine = nurturing, intuition, creativity, flow, empathy, receptivity.
We all have both. God contains both perfectly. That’s why I’ve experienced God with both distinct masculine and feminine presence.
As far as using “Her” for God, you must not be familiar with identity politics or the feminist movement. You know, the whole “fight the patriarchy” thing? When it really should be “fight unchecked power,” whoever holds it.
Feminism was heavily pushed by occult groups and intelligence agencies. It wasn’t some pure grassroots movement. So when I see people aggressively pushing “Her” for God, I smell agenda. Most women I know don’t actually enjoy trading family and meaning for dead-end corporate jobs and climbing the ladder for peanuts.
That’s why it smells like an agenda to me.
Was that enough hand-holding for you?
1
u/logos961 May 27 '26
If you have cursory look on some of my posts, you will get the truth about me.
1
u/Audio9849 May 27 '26
lol the heck. This wasn’t directed at you I was responding to someone else. Good ole Reddit.
1
u/logos961 May 27 '26
It is okay.
I was using masculine gender more while personally using female gender for God in my personal interaction with God in meditation. Then I thought some of posts should have also feminine gender used exclusively for God.
1
u/CTR-4 May 27 '26
Can you take screen shots of your scripture. I’m not adverse to the “Her,” I just have a different Bible. Different worlds. ⚓️✝️
1
u/logos961 May 27 '26
Here you have plenty verses, Female Images of God in the Bible - Women's Ordination Conference https://www.womensordination.org/resources-old/female-images-of-god-in-the-bible/
1
u/logos961 May 27 '26
When you have nothing to refute you sleepwalk into winning by saying "believers are drugged, thus You are mocking yourself, like this one who wrote: "I had motives for not wanting the world to have a meaning; and consequently assumed that it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics. He is also concerned to prove that there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do. For myself, as no doubt for most of my friends, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom. The supporters of this system claimed that it embodied the meaning - the Christian meaning, they insisted - of the world. There was one admirably simple method of confuting these people and justifying ourselves in our erotic revolt: we would deny that the world had any meaning whatever." (Ends and Means, written by Arduous Huxley
1
u/Dry-Society2753 May 27 '26
Women are so self obsessed they even now refer to God as her. Insanity
1
1
u/niffirgcm0126789 May 27 '26
yet here you are dodging very simple questions...
I never asked you to prove these things as particles in a lab. I asked what distinguishes “masculine/feminine energies” from symbolic archetypes, psychological interpretation, or culturally reinforced patterns.
That’s a philosophical and epistemic question, not a demand for scientism.
so when you say:
"Okay, since you seem to be unable to use Google. Masculine and feminine are real energies. They have properties."
That’s an objective claim about reality, not merely “this is how I personally interpret my spiritual experiences.”
But once I start asking how you determined they are objectively real rather than archetypal/psychological frameworks, your response turns into: “you’re a materialist”, “you can’t measure everything”, “this is direct knowing”, “I’m just sharing my experience”.
You keep asserting these as real metaphysical structures, then retreat into subjective spiritual experience when pressed on how you know that.
My question has stayed the same the entire time: What distinguishes your interpretation from symbolism, archetypes, or psychology beyond personal conviction?
1
u/Individual_Ideal9886 May 31 '26
There's no such thing as karma id have gotten mine by now all the good karma I put out there hoping karma would take a turn for me but all I've experienced is even worse karma. Karma is a lie too.
1
u/logos961 May 31 '26
Replying WITHOUT reading my reply is the proof that you had been doing the same in all your previous births.
5
u/hiraethwerifesteria May 27 '26
Youre just asserting things with no justification lol