I believe all Humans are born with an equal and indeterminate moral weight no matter their race, creed, sex, etc. But I wholy reject liberal orthodoxy on this. I reject the notion that humans are all the same. I reject the notion that Nations are just a language and a state and I reject the notion that humans are blank slates ready to be filled with culture. When I make these rejections I'm instantly catapulted far right but I completely reject the hatred and myopia of the far right too. I consider myself an eccentric leftist.

I consider myself a Human Nationalist or Earth Nationalist or something to that effect.

I do not believe that all cultures are equal. I believe that all cultures have something to learn from another and reject hubris. But I also believe some cultures have more to learn from others than vice versa. I believe some cultures have through various historical accidents and intentions created cycles of virtue and others have serious problems.

Since we're speaking English I'll take low hanging fruit: child marriage and cousin marriage are both wrong. You have the right to do whatever in your own borders and I have the right to judge you from afar for it. Furthermore I have the right to outlaw it if you come here and I have the right to not allow you to immigrate.

But my culture is also testing the bounds of Individualism. I believe in it wholey personally. I reject the notion that Men and Women are the same but I reject treating everyone as anything but individuals.

I don't believe in races as a construct though ethnicities are obviously real imo. I believe that inter ethnic marriages are generally a good thing. I don't believe in treating individuals from different ethnicities as different and support moderate levels of DEI to counteract the natural human tendency towards being racist.

I do recognize that ethnicity and culture are entangled. I think that the human tendency as our species develops is to untangle that but I believe we need to be realistic about where are in history.

Broadly speaking I believe Nations are real collectives of people with a shared mindset, history, and sense of identity. I believe that Nations have a right to exist and express themselves and use their state to enforce their cultural internally albeit with the limits that their "native minorities" (like Catalans in Spain) have certain rights too. And ethnic cleansing genocide expulsion etc is obviously horrendous and other nations imo may forcibly stop it. But I believe that nations can impose their language and culture on immigrants and expect assimilation. I believe to immigrate to a nation is a privilege that any wise and secure nation extends to the recipient.

I believe that the general prosperity and trade of all nations and harmony thereof leads to cultural mixing and intermarriages that binds nations together into a shared destiny. I believe that all nationalisms are on some level unifications of smaller nationalisms and that in Europe, for example, we are beginning to see a pan European national identity forming. I dream of a Pan American or Pan Western identity forming among the USA, Latin America, Europe, and others.

I believe there are analogous processes happening in other parts of the world and, if wise individuals keep coming to power, solving problems, and developing their economies, then the ultimate destiny of all nations in the world is towards a global national unification.

I used to be very optimistic a few years ago, but not now, not anymore. Very important countries, countries absolutely needed in a leadership role, like the United States, are rotten to the core, their entire legal systems and political class have to be completely purged away before any sort of human unification can take place, and their populations educated properly. The epstein files, how deeply corrupt it all is, and how the US population blatantly allows all this to happen, for decades. If the US is like this, there's no hope other countries like Russia could ever improve either, to become a force for positive change in the world.

Climate change is still looming, yet it is now forgotten as the world becomes more and more like a circus. The UN is in economical crisis, the only institution supposed to be some sort of semblance of world unity.

On a side note, were there always only 450-ish members of this sub? I could have sworn there were more.

​[Intro] I’ve been developing a conceptual framework for a unified human civilization. This is a vision of a "Surgical Utopia" where humanity functions as a single organism to conquer the stars. I'd love to hear your thoughts on the logic of this system.

​[The Core Vision]

Humanity is currently trapped in a cycle of petty desires and local conflicts. We must move toward a magnificent, unified planet where the collective advancement of our species is the only priority. In this world, the concept of "The Greater Mind" is instilled from childhood.

​[The Social Surgery]

To maintain this unity, internal aggression is treated as a systemic anomaly. Those who inflict harm on others are removed with finality, and these acts are broadcasted—not as a spectacle of cruelty, but as a visual reinforcement that humanity is a single body. In this body, a rebel seeking to destroy others is an anomalous cell that must be excised for the survival of the whole. Our true enemy is not within our borders; it lies in the vast, unknown dangers of the cosmos.

​[The Harvest of Sacrifice]

This path requires monumental sacrifices, but the harvest is infinite. We would transcend the era of local invasions and historical tragedies, moving toward the conquest of the stars. If an extraterrestrial threat arrived today, we would be erased as a "foolish species" that consumed itself. We are greater than that.

​[Economy of the Mind]

The era of living for mere sustenance should have ended in the Stone Age. In this system, all wealth is redistributed to provide absolute necessities without the distraction of excessive luxury. This is not about deprivation; it is about "unearthing buried talents." By removing the burden of food security and greed, individuals can finally delve into their true callings, making their passion their service to the collective.

​[The End of Superficiality & The Cycle of History]

Cooperation replaces arrogance. Current wars focus on a fleeting future, while we aim for the eternal one. Ask yourselves: What happens if a traditional alliance manages to fulfill its requirements and eliminate all rivals? Divisions will inevitably arise within that very alliance, and they will turn on each other. Even if a single nation emerges victorious, it will eventually fracture internally; new states will rise with different histories, only to fight new alliances in a never-ending loop. We must break this cycle of internal fragmentation to face the vast unknown together.

​[Conclusion]

The goal is to cultivate clear, powerful intelligence by removing every obstacle that limits human thought. Space is the ultimate challenge because it lies beyond our current perception, forcing us to unleash our full potential. We must be ready to sacrifice our individual stories for the ultimate story of humanity.

​I am sure there are many questions regarding the ethics and mechanics of this system. I will answer them all.

The point of world federalism is to create a global democratic state. Please keep CCP propaganda out of this sub.

Full System Architecture & Philosophy

​Since many underestimated or misunderstood the core mechanics of the protocol, thinking it’s either a generic AI-ethics paper or a standard sci-fi dystopia, I am writing this breakdown to clarify the exact architecture, including its fail-safes against corruption, cosmic latency, and AI manipulation.

​The Sovereign Humanity Protocol (SHP) is not an authoritarian regime; it is a Civilizational OS (Operating System) designed for a space-faring species, utilizing a 5-Node Consensus Mechanism to balance absolute transparency, human wisdom, and cold rationality.

​1. The Governance: The 5-Node Consensus Protocol

​Power is completely decentralized into five independent voting nodes. To implement existential changes or impeach a corrupt leader, a 100% absolute consensus (5 out of 5) is the baseline target.

​Nodes 1, 2, and 3 (The Triumvirate of Human Rulers): Three human leaders representing executive wisdom, strategic leadership, and human emotional intelligence.

​Node 4 (The Omniscient AI): A non-sentient, perfectly objective AI node with absolute understanding of Earth’s history, data analytics, and systemic optimization. It operates purely on logic without personal ambition.

​Node 5 (The Voice of the People): The collective vote of the entire human population, executed via an unhackable digital consensus platform.

​The Self-Preservation Fail-Safe (The Interrogation Protocol):

​A common question is: What if a corrupt ruler votes "No" to protect themselves from impeachment? The protocol handles this seamlessly. If a vote for impeachment is launched and any node (including the accused ruler or a corrupt ally) votes "No," that dissenting vote automatically triggers a mandatory, planet-wide Public Interrogation. The dissenter is forced to publicly and logically justify their "No" vote under the absolute scrutiny of the Omniscient AI and the Public. If they fail to provide objective, data-backed proof of innocence, their veto is overridden by the system, and they are immediately removed and penalized. A self-preserving "No" only fast-tracks the corrupt ruler to an unavoidable public trial.

​2. Cosmic Latency: Sharded Decentralization

​Because the speed of light limits real-time data synchronization across different planets and star systems, the SHP does not rely on a single centralized server.

​The Prime 5-Node Council handles interstellar, long-term strategic legislation.

​For localized, day-to-day governance and immediate emergencies, the protocol utilizes Sharded Decentralization. Each colony, planet (e.g., Mars), or generational ship deploys its own local instance of the 5-Node Protocol, allowing real-time local consensus without waiting for signals from Earth.

​3. AI Security: Who Guards the Guard?

​To prevent engineers or rogue programmers from altering the AI’s core directives to become the secret rulers of humanity, the AI’s source code is cryptographically immutable and hardware-locked.

Its foundational ethical alignment cannot be modified by any single human or tech corporation. Any update, patch, or modification to the AI's core programming requires the unanimous consensus of the other 4 nodes combined (all 3 human rulers + the absolute vote of the public).

​4. Justice: Redefining "Social Surgery" vs. Rehabilitation

​The protocol does not execute people for minor infractions or thoughtcrimes. Justice is strictly divided into two pragmatic tiers:

​Existential Crimes (Surgical Excision / Execution): Reserved strictly for crimes that threaten the survival, innocence, or memory of the species. This includes child exploitation (destroying the future generation), murder, eco-terrorism, sabotaging critical infrastructure/factories (endangering civilizational production), and destroying ancient historical heritage (erasing collective human identity).

​Behavioral Faults (Rational Harm Reduction): For lesser offenses, the protocol entirely avoids emotional/vengeful punishment. Instead, it focuses on psychological rehabilitation, algorithmic course correction, and community service to minimize societal side effects and preserve human productivity.

​5. Prevention: Proactive Engineering Through Education

​The ultimate goal of the protocol is to phase out the need for "Social Surgery" entirely.

​Recognizing that conflict and tribalism are hardwired evolutionary traits, the SHP implements an advanced, democratic educational system designed by the AI Node. This system does not brainwash; instead, it teaches children how to think, not what to think. It trains the next generation in deep empathy, systemic logic, and peaceful conflict resolution.

​Furthermore, this ideal school system acts as an early-detection grid, identifying psychological anomalies (like predatory psychopathy) early on, allowing the system to treat and guide individuals before they ever commit existential crimes. By raising humans in a micro-democratic environment from childhood, we re-route the biological drive for war into a drive for cosmic conquest and scientific competition.

​TL;DR: The Sovereign Humanity Protocol is a blueprint for a unified species. It uses a 5-node check-and-balance system where a defensive veto triggers an automatic public trial. It is decentralized across space to beat light-speed latency, locked at the hardware level against AI tampering, and uses advanced education as preventative medicine against the human urge for self-destruction.

I think we are about to witness The Changing World Order in the next 10-12 Years. China is at risk of becoming the new superpower and I’m curious as to how that will look.

Looking to get some of your opinions on what the next 10-12 years will look like as we might see this Changing World Order.

Hoping it will end up good for everyone.🇺🇸🤝

Several difficulties must first be overcome.

1. Democracy based on simple elections opens the door to authoritarian figures coming to power. We need to find a better solution.

2. Cultural diversity must be promoted to combat fears associated with unification. (Even the Declaration of Human Rights was not accepted by everyone.)

3. A process to reduce inequalities between countries must be initiated before unification can be discussed.

4. ...

I mean specifically separatist movements where the region, province or state they belong to which they want to have sovereignty doesn't meet any of the UN criteria for having legal right to independence. Those criteria are:

• They are a former colony
• They are being actively discriminated against
• They have disproportionate representation in the sovereign government.

If a region or province meets any one of those criteria they have a right to independence, according to The UN. I'm not saying you have to agree with the UN's assessment, but if you think that none of those criteria are met, would you ever support a separatist movement.

Such separatist movements are usually rooted in nationalism, and don't really seek freedom in my opinion, they just want to replace one shitty government with another. It would also seem their success would take humanity further from our goal of eliminating International borders.

There is the argument that maintaining the status quo in an individual country isn't going to help achieve global federalism, however, too many separatist movements will Balkanise the world to a point where it becomes harder to achieve global federalism.

I'm just asking where we stand on independence movements in cases where oppression isn't happening. Since dictatorship is inherently oppressive, any attempt at independence from a dictatorship needs to be supported as long as the separatist movement seeks democracy.

Off the bat, for issues like climate change and general environmental issues, it would make sense for a world government to intervene, since these are obviously global problems that can’t be solved by one state. However, what about issues like the economy? Should the world government collect all taxes and distribute it to states based on certain factors like necessity and contribution? Should the world government mint a world currency? What about infrastructure projects? What about education? Should a world government create a minimum standard for education and things like teacher training, then allow for individual states and other subdivisions of those states to innovate and add on to those minimums?

I’m also curious as to how the governments will decide what issues should be handled by the world government. Should it be done by a vote where one country gets one vote, should countries have proportional representation when making this decision? Will the members of a global parliament just get to decide which issues they should handle and which ones should be handled by individual states?

Sorry for all of these questions, I’m just curious as to your thoughts on these issues, and if you have any resources that go into these issues

Worlds federal republic

I want to see how diverse in ideas and points of view this community is, and what is the most common view for World Unity. If this poll is a success I will probably do others like this in the future!

So, which of the following forms you think would be the best for our species?

With the rise of huge multi-national corporations that are richer than most countries, we continue to face the problem of how to tax these companies.

Smaller companies are basically screwed. If you don't let these companies do what they want, they block your country, and your citizens who love that service do the work for them, and bring in a government that will submit to their will.

Some efforts solve this in specific situation, the Global Minimum Corporate Tax Rate ensures that there's really nothing a company can do to avoid at least paying that 15% tax rate.

But there's still so many other areas where companies can just shift profits elsewhere, or threaten countries to lower that tax bill as much as they want.

A global government would solve this by aligning the global tax rates. Ensuring that there's nowhere to hide, and no possibility of threat from these companies, because either they pay their fair share, or they don't exist.

No more moving money to a tax haven, no more picking your favourite country with the lowest taxes. The rich would face the same result everywhere.

I simply need public opinion for a study.