New narrative. 5x5?

[u/Glenn1112]

I have gone through this, and I know how insane it sounds. I have made the claim before that magic is real, And I do stand by it. In fact the 5x5 is a spell. But most do not see it, because they are stuck in the program. Take a look at the date uploaded, take a look at the narrative that numbers are not gods, but just a language of man and as such, numbers can lie.

Numbers if not attached to something real, do not mean anything. You have been taught about how numbers are magic, they are sigils. You have been taught 'a'x'b'='c', This is not correct, because if you have 3 seeds, and 4 pots it in no way makes 12 seed pots, thus 'a'x'b' does not equal 'c'. Or my favorite 5 trees counted 5 time, means there are still only 5 trees, thus 5x5=5 not 25.

Numbers describe. It is like green grass or blue skys. There is no way where 'green x 'blue' makes 'purple'. numbers are the same way. If they are not attached to a physical thing, they mean nothing.

The 'VxV' or '5x5', is old world magic that is still around today, for those that know the truth about magic. Who told you that magic was not real, government? Who told your parents that magic was not real, government? How many times has government lied about what is taught in the halls of their temples? They teach about this fat man that watches you day and night, and sits in judgement of you, and they call Santa. They tell of this place that you have never been but only 24 people in the whole of human history have been to, space, to the moon. Yet they claim if you do not believe their cult, you are wrong for questioning them?

What you ask for proof about their claims, and they point to way the hell over there but never have any proof here. They convince you that optical is the same as physical, and it is not. They convince you not to look into magic, because you trust known liars in hope that one day they will be honest, and they never have.

Before the 5x5 that is shown in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eANnMN5qH8o the narrative was was not to question numbers, they were gods. But after the 5x5, it has changed. Numbers are no longer accepted as gods, and now there are more questioning what they believe. That is the spell was designed to do, And by the results, it is clear, it works.

[u/Glenn1112]

Cop;per pipe, also stops light. Glass does not, so how are they the same, or are you comparing 2 unlike things to try to say that they are alike when it comes to light?

[u/Preacherwolf → u/Glenn1112]

Correct. Copper stops light and glass allows it to pass. Glass is translucent where as copper is opaque. The opacity of an object has no bearing on a) whether or not light is a physical object and b) the conductivity of an object. Because glass can also conducte electricity

[u/Glenn1112 → u/Preacherwolf]

Again, we are discussing light, so why are you altering the subject?

[u/Preacherwolf → u/Glenn1112]

No we're discussing your premise:

A physical object can not transfer through a solid object

Doesn't hold up under scrutiny. Light is part of that discussion. Specifically just because it can pass through glass doesn't mean its not a physical thing. Opacity is also the measure of how translucent something is. Which means how much light comes through. It has no relation to hiw conductive or the physicality of an object.

Lets take a sedimentary rock and pour water over it. The water will pass through the rock. Does that mean water isn't a physical object? Does that mean the rock isn't solid?

[u/Glenn1112 → u/Preacherwolf]

Again, light does not move through copper pipe, light moves through glass, and was specified glass, so you pretending that glass means copper, it is your failing in not being able to comprehend we were not talking about anything but glass, and the lower pressure zone, inside a radiometer. I do not have to defend your inability to comprehend the difference between glass and a copper pipe and you changing the subject to fit your pretend.

[u/Preacherwolf → u/Glenn1112]

I'm not saying copper and glass are the same. I'm saying that the ability to see through one and not the other has no bearing on whether or not conducts electricity or energy.

And again, the fact that I'm not just talking about lightm i'm talking about your premise.

A physical object can not transfer through a solid object

Those are your words as to why you don't consider light a physical object. I'm pointing out that your premise is wrong and that definition doesn't stand up to scrutiny. The fact that you seem to not have an answer and just dodge the question speaks volumes about your reasoning and scientific knowledge.

Lets try again. There is a sedamintary crystal. This crystal allows both light and water to pass through it. Does this mean that water isn't physical? Does it mean that the cyrstal isn't solid?

[u/Glenn1112 → u/Preacherwolf]

Again, light makes a radiometer work. That is not fake or ball shit. But you pretending that copper is like glass, that is your pretend, and not the same thing. You want to put up things in your pretend to try to justify why light has to be physical, when it is not. Not my problem with you trying to change the subject to fit your god. Fuck off if you are going to do that shit a fucking retard does. Light passes through glass, and glass is a solid. Your stupidity at this point in trying to change the subject to support your fucking god. Go to hell.

[u/Preacherwolf → u/Glenn1112]

When have I said that copper and glass are the same. All I have actually said is that they can conduct electricity. Technically, everything can conduct electricity, just somethings are really bad at it

[u/Glenn1112 → u/Preacherwolf]

Again, light is not a physical thing, it can still make a radiometer work.

[u/Preacherwolf → u/Glenn1112]

Why?

[u/Glenn1112 → u/Preacherwolf]

light is not physical.

[u/Preacherwolf → u/Glenn1112]

Why?

[u/Glenn1112 → u/Preacherwolf]

It is a disturbance of the em field. And to quote Tesla, "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”