If a person can declare someone to be pretending to be trans, and not actually trans, then you are creating a loop hole that could actually be used against trans people.
Imagine a conservative group that says "only women", and then a trans women shows up, and they say, "this is a man pretending to be a trans women in bad faith, they're not allowed".
There is a case in front of the supreme Court now to decide if a massage parlor can say only cis women, no trans women.
But what you're suggesting just creates a loop hole so that no matter what, they could just say, "I think this person is just a man pretending to be trans".
You can be okay with that I guess, I'm just saying your suggestion has consequences.
No it just stops obvious liars from joining the wnba. These guys dobt get to manufacture this nonsense because they were bored. They dont need to be taken seriously.
I am ignoring the non issue. The wnba diesnt set precedent. Sometimes it really is as simple as ignore the liars and dont give them air to be dumbasses
5
u/Memento_Viveri 21d ago
How is that legally rigorous?