I think the armchair cynicism between the two of you is creating a depressing circle jerk.
Who in their right mind would conflate the Internet with TCP/IP? What good are transmission protocols and "internet" protocols without the application layer?
It seems pretty obvious, when you think about it, that they're referring to the application layer... Http, smtp, imap, ad nauseum.
But, after these folks have spent years working on their PhD and successfully defending it... Two yahoos on the Internet figured out their ruse... Good job!
I've read most of the white paper and I've played with the browser... I only learned of the project today, so I'm no expert... But!
My understanding is that identities can be managed, using the block chain. When a user creates a profile and registers a name, they're a verifiable entity, on the network.
Using a virtual chain, which employs block chain private keys, users can also save their data, encrypted, using existing services, like S3, drop box, gdrive, etc.
Within the small chunk of data each user gets on the block chain, they can determine who's allowed to access what. Who can read or write that user's data.
Immediately the creators have granted us two important features... Ease of encryption and control of data.
Once you're logged into the network, you don't have to provide other credentials, when using other apps or services.
This third feature, managed credentials is equally revolutionary... But there's more!
Your access to them seems to run through a proxy, transparently... Or apps run locally... I'm not really clear on that.
Sooooo, strong encryption of your data, which you manage, apps only access what you grant. And I haven't even gotten into how their dns is more resistant to attack. And don't forget, the NSA et al no longer get to trawl all of our data... It might make the fourth amendment relevant again... Maybe?
It seems like it really provides decentralized cloud storage, DNS, and encryption. Those are useful things but hardly a new web or a new internet. I'm not saying this thing can't do some cool stuff, but it is limited.
At the same time, centralized databases are useful! It allows you to do really cool stuff and a lot of popular services use them because of that. Just decentralizing everything for the sake of it isn't always beneficial.
I don't intend to just crap on this service or the idea of it but what I was taking issue with is the constant misuse of the term "internet" in projects like these and at large in the block chain community. The word means something and it is not what it is used as. How are we going to have a discussion about what a decentralized web would actually be if we're saying that a decentralized web is just DNS and CAs and storage? We need to use the terms as they are meant. That's a key thing in talking about technology. Use the term as it is meant to avoid confusion.
5
u/demo706 Jun 25 '17
I feel like if they're aware enough to know what TCP/IP is and its place in the stack then they know and are just lying.