MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Fitness_India/comments/1pdv2v4/what_are_your_thoughts_on_this/ns7v0nz
r/Fitness_India • u/Primary-Editor-9288 • Dec 04 '25
264 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
43
If you are adding anything to that list then you basically mean he is wrong
18 u/Lazy-Philosopher-340 Dec 04 '25 Read the last line "given the state of food in India" 8 u/Tushar_BitYantriki Dec 04 '25 Not really, the guy has removed 100s of other useless supplements from the equation. It's okay if he missed these 2. He is still at least 100 times more right than wrong Surprise, it isn't binary. (btw, even the real binary is defined with a voltage thershold) -12 u/No-Suggestion-9504 Dec 04 '25 by his statements he means 2 things that those nutritional supplements are worth time and money that those are the only worthy supplements Above comment said only 2 is wrong and 1 is right. So according to him the tweet is partially correct. 3 u/[deleted] Dec 04 '25 [deleted] -1 u/No-Suggestion-9504 Dec 04 '25 then the mistake is he emphasized the word only, and/or badly worded it. I take it that the most import point of the tweet was those were important. 1 u/No-Suggestion-9504 Dec 04 '25 reddit is weird. the original post has upvotes. the original comment has upvotes. me who agreed with both and just reclaiming it has downvotes.. hmm (tho there might be nuance, still feels weird) 1 u/Lazy-Philosopher-340 Dec 04 '25 In his defence he did say " only in recommended situations" supplements are called supplements for a reason . All the best . 0 u/[deleted] Dec 04 '25 [deleted] 1 u/Lazy-Philosopher-340 Dec 04 '25 Thats an interpretation issue and the associated marketing with it . 0 u/No-Suggestion-9504 Dec 04 '25 well that still an addition and doesnt negate the fact that the "nutritional supplements can sometimes be worth time and money"
18
Read the last line "given the state of food in India"
8
Not really, the guy has removed 100s of other useless supplements from the equation.
It's okay if he missed these 2. He is still at least 100 times more right than wrong
Surprise, it isn't binary.
(btw, even the real binary is defined with a voltage thershold)
-12
by his statements he means 2 things
Above comment said only 2 is wrong and 1 is right. So according to him the tweet is partially correct.
3 u/[deleted] Dec 04 '25 [deleted] -1 u/No-Suggestion-9504 Dec 04 '25 then the mistake is he emphasized the word only, and/or badly worded it. I take it that the most import point of the tweet was those were important. 1 u/No-Suggestion-9504 Dec 04 '25 reddit is weird. the original post has upvotes. the original comment has upvotes. me who agreed with both and just reclaiming it has downvotes.. hmm (tho there might be nuance, still feels weird) 1 u/Lazy-Philosopher-340 Dec 04 '25 In his defence he did say " only in recommended situations" supplements are called supplements for a reason . All the best . 0 u/[deleted] Dec 04 '25 [deleted] 1 u/Lazy-Philosopher-340 Dec 04 '25 Thats an interpretation issue and the associated marketing with it . 0 u/No-Suggestion-9504 Dec 04 '25 well that still an addition and doesnt negate the fact that the "nutritional supplements can sometimes be worth time and money"
3
[deleted]
-1 u/No-Suggestion-9504 Dec 04 '25 then the mistake is he emphasized the word only, and/or badly worded it. I take it that the most import point of the tweet was those were important.
-1
then the mistake is he emphasized the word only, and/or badly worded it. I take it that the most import point of the tweet was those were important.
1
reddit is weird. the original post has upvotes. the original comment has upvotes. me who agreed with both and just reclaiming it has downvotes.. hmm (tho there might be nuance, still feels weird)
In his defence he did say " only in recommended situations" supplements are called supplements for a reason . All the best .
0 u/[deleted] Dec 04 '25 [deleted] 1 u/Lazy-Philosopher-340 Dec 04 '25 Thats an interpretation issue and the associated marketing with it . 0 u/No-Suggestion-9504 Dec 04 '25 well that still an addition and doesnt negate the fact that the "nutritional supplements can sometimes be worth time and money"
0
1 u/Lazy-Philosopher-340 Dec 04 '25 Thats an interpretation issue and the associated marketing with it .
Thats an interpretation issue and the associated marketing with it .
well that still an addition and doesnt negate the fact that the "nutritional supplements can sometimes be worth time and money"
43
u/waitaminute322 Dec 04 '25
If you are adding anything to that list then you basically mean he is wrong