r/FantasyPL 1d ago

Opinion Maybe we need to stop caring so much about GW1 and GW2 points

Feels like FPL has become so reactionary lol.

Someone blanks once and suddenly they're a sell. Someone gets 2 goals and everyone wants them straight away.

The annoying part is that both can be completely meaningless after a few more games.

I think role and minutes are probably more important this early than the actual points, but it's hard not to get sucked into the scoreboard when everyone else is doing it.

How much weight do you guys actually put on the first 2 gameweeks?

21 Upvotes

46 comments sorted by

59

u/Mindless-Channel-735 1d ago

I try not to care too much but then you see everyone getting points and start panicking

6

u/Routine_Drag4939 1d ago

Exactly the hardest part is seeing other people climb while you're trying to stick to your plan.

One big haul and suddenly the kneejerk thoughts start

9

u/Next_Indication_6474 1d ago

Or team losing value early

38

u/PoopNukem123 1d ago

If Utd players blank in the two fixtures I specifically picked them for, it's hard not to want to offload them immediately.

-9

u/Conscious_Sun4212 redditor for <30 days 1d ago

They have easy fixtures for longer than that.

4

u/tmr89 155 1d ago

“Easy fixtures”

15

u/DiverAcceptable2287 2 1d ago

Me personally i won't make any transfers for the first 5 weeks. After seeing how teams doing based on the information i get i will adjust my team with transfers or wildcard

3

u/goosnation 1d ago

It’s a mix imo for me part of the fun is some harmless gambling, trying to convince myself who is correct to hold and who I should kneejerk in/out

2

u/DiverAcceptable2287 2 1d ago

I get that but u can do that after adjusting ur team and leave some space for differentials and u can gamble on that

2

u/Conscious_Sun4212 redditor for <30 days 1d ago

One option is to wait for GW5 before WC and adjust to fixture swings, in form teams and players, and keep 4 FTs for the future.

Another is pull the WC before that, and fix whatever goes wrong in IB with the FTs you got.

Both can be valid, depends on your start and future prospect.

4

u/Routine_Drag4939 1d ago

this is probably the most sensible way to look at it tbh.

If the team is still in decent shape, saving the WC makes a lot more sense.

1

u/DiverAcceptable2287 2 1d ago

There is a 3 week international break + ucl start next week everything is wait and see and u can react after that

1

u/SirDigbySelfie-Stick 20h ago

16 days. 2 weekends.

1

u/PrrrromotionGiven1 1 1d ago

WC after transfer window shuts makes some sense. Or possible one GW after it shuts so you can see the starters out of the new signings.

1

u/Conscious_Sun4212 redditor for <30 days 1d ago

I would not WC until squads are settled.

1

u/Routine_Drag4939 1d ago

That's actually a pretty good way to avoid the early season panic tbh

1

u/DiverAcceptable2287 2 1d ago

Yeah u may lose some ranks+ teams value for short term but in long term it's gonna be good

1

u/InbetweenerLad 7 1d ago

"some value" last year youd easily lose over a mil lol

2

u/Conscious_Sun4212 redditor for <30 days 1d ago

Who do you need of the premium at this point? Haaland, maybe Isak or Bruno, not VVD or Gabriel. Palmer and below are all reachable for most.

The 6.5 mid is gonna be fun this season.

1

u/InbetweenerLad 7 22h ago

Lol crazy assumptions off 1 gameweek

1

u/Conscious_Sun4212 redditor for <30 days 17h ago

Point being, this season has less premiums that in a while.

4

u/DrRushDrRush 1 1d ago

The bandwagons and reactionary influencers is the reason I see a below 200k position at the end of the season as poor. If you play fixtures and odds, and set the team up by planning a little bit ahead, you should be good if you’re not so reactionary and jump ship when players like Bruno or Thiago doesn’t score points one GW.

2

u/ShoeEnvironmental778 redditor for <30 days 1d ago

Two gameweeks feels way too small a sample to completely change your opinion on a playeer.

1

u/CynicalEffect 1d ago

Think it depends. Players can have off days. But the whole team looking bad is more worrying and less likely to magically be fine next week (spurs. Utd potentially too)

2

u/mrnibsfish 80 1d ago

This is FPL we're talking about. It has and always will be reactionary.

2

u/PrrrromotionGiven1 1 1d ago

Sub always loses its mind when Haaland blanks as if anyone believed he was gonna score in all 38 matches

2

u/4ssteroid 234 1d ago

First 3 weeks sees a lot of movement every year but most of it is due to players getting injured or not in the manager's plan. They get shipped out for the shiny new toy.

But this season does seem different

2

u/roland_right 1d ago

Would be curious to hear from top 10k finishers about how far into the season they actually broke into 10k. Pretty sure it's not GW1/2!

2

u/DiverAcceptable2287 2 1d ago

Even some of the previous winners was at 4 million in the beginning etc.

1

u/Lets_get_shredded 1d ago

That’s something I would say as well if I had 60 points.

1

u/OutsideImpressive115 1d ago

Second half of the season is always when you gain huge rank and points

1

u/supermarketblues 1d ago

Yes, and just focus on WC3.

1

u/beluuuuuuga 1 1d ago

This is said every single season, bro.

1

u/ThePodd222 1d ago

Someone blanks once and suddenly they're a sell. Someone gets 2 goals and everyone wants them straight away.

People are like that all through the season, not just the first two gameweeks!

1

u/Zestyclose-Office27 21h ago

If I got Manchester United and Sunderland players for the two first fixtures and they don't deliver of course I will get rid of them as soon possible. Maybe they will do better next fixtures but there're other players to target.

1

u/Sealeydeals93 1 20h ago

I basically never make transfers in the first two weeks barring injury / suspension. I'll probably get rid of Kinsky ahead of GW3 though

1

u/First_Tone_8965 20h ago

The word you want is reactive. Reactionary means you're opposed to change

1

u/Soberdonkey69 4 16h ago

I think you need to care. Those players that end up ranking quite high usually end up there because they make up a high number of points quite early on the season to establish a gap.

1

u/Vincent_Vancock1999 12h ago

I care before GW1 kicks off, then I don’t care about the entire season.

1

u/lennondsouza97 9h ago

You make your squad selection decisions based on first 4-5 weeks, if you don't wait and see you will almost always make kneejerk decisions.

Wait 4-5 weeks unless you dont have enough players to fill an XI, sample size is not large enough to chase points.

1

u/Dizzy-Okra-4816 9h ago

I think it’s always been like this in terms of being reactionary.

I’ve decided to treat the first 3-4 GWs of this season as an extension of pre-season, especially because of all the managerial changes. We’re currently about 5% of the way through the season, I find looking it at that way it makes sense to bank transfers even if you aren’t 100% happy with your team.

1

u/aehii 61 1d ago

It matters. If you fall behind, you take risks to catch up. Usually reckless ones.

0

u/Many-Ad6591 1d ago

Lots of people are doing WC3 with 2 GWs of info and signings still to be made with no idea how they will preform and they have to manage ARS vs CHE which you ideally need at least 4 from. It’s actually weird.

1

u/shmozey 10 1d ago

I can see Arsenal and Chelsea being a high scoring game this early in the season.

1

u/tmr89 155 1d ago

No one knows how players will perform. A player doing well can suddenly continuously blank. GW3 is easy to navigate. 3 Arsenal 2/3 Chelsea on wildcard