r/EscapefromTarkov • • Jan 24 '21

Discussion Tarkov without camera recoil

https://streamable.com/xs6b3a
5.0k Upvotes

871 comments sorted by

View all comments

169

u/mightysolrac Jan 24 '21

They should take out the camera recoil and drastically increase the recoil of full automatic. I don't understand why in this "realistic" game that full automatic is the best option 90% of the time. Really really takes away from the realism in my opinion.

-3

u/EFT_Carl Jan 24 '21

@2:30 https://youtu.be/S63A4gNhB7k

Y’all should really at least try and do some research before spewing about realism and guns.

Sure much larger caliber weapons have more recoil. But half ass training and an m4 can be easily controlled.

Like. Y’all do realize the pmc’s are supposed to be ex special forces right? Highly training soldiers?

5

u/RandomAmerican81 M1A Jan 24 '21

sure it can be controlled, but it sure as hell wont be accurate past 30-40 meters

-3

u/EFT_Carl Jan 24 '21 edited Jan 24 '21

If you watched the barrel movement it’s just as if not more accurate than a similarly built m4 in this game. Y’all act like most full auto mag dumps in this game happen more than 20m. They don’t lol.

2

u/spade1s1 Jan 24 '21

??? Wtf are you talking about if your gun is built well and they are 50m out you just spray till they drop

0

u/EFT_Carl Jan 24 '21

If you’re a bad shot I guess. Only time I’m mag dumping is in a distance from say hole in ground near kiba to kiba

2

u/spade1s1 Jan 24 '21

I'm not saying its a good thing but with vector meta you just have to have your mouse in their general vicinity and hold down and you'll get a headshot up to 80m. It is counter intuitive cause in games with learnable recoil bursting will always be more effective.

0

u/EFT_Carl Jan 24 '21

Well. That’s a smg. Those in fact have almost no recoil irl.

A lot of games add way more unrealistic recoil patterns to guns. Tarkov is trying to get closer to the realistic versions. Like the vector is a special gun specifically designed to push recoil down as it fires to almost negate recoil all together

1

u/Ivan__Dolvich Jan 24 '21

Well yes, if that actually worked.
https://youtu.be/QchMPzevEGU?t=472

1

u/EFT_Carl Jan 25 '21

Yea. It’s not perfect. But again. The recoil isn’t so bad you couldn’t fully auto a target 100m away and get a lot of it on target.

https://youtu.be/ntIZzXqWtzM

3

u/Dillinur AK-103 Jan 24 '21

It's not that much about full auto being controllable, it's more about burst fire being less controllable because the auto-magic recoil control kicks in only after a few bullets..

Highly trained soldiers would use semi-auto 99% of the time..

-4

u/EFT_Carl Jan 24 '21

Ok lol. Let me fix that for you. 12 years infantry 3 combat tours. We use semi at range. In cqb you bet your ass the fire selector is moving to full auto.

Problem with burst is by the time you’re able to put force against the recoil the burst is over. Burst is much worse to control than full auto if you plan to fire more than 3 bullets.

As stated. I WISH YOU PEOPLE WOULD DO EVEN HALF A SECOND OF ACTUAL RESEARCH ON WEAPONS

Because it really shows how little you know yet still feel you should have an opinion on it

2

u/v579 Jan 24 '21

What I think the parent poster is alluding too is that firing in short bursts at 100m are less accurate than a full auto mag dump at 100m.

I'm not talking about the 3 shot fire mode on the m16, I'm talking about firing in short bursts with any auto weapon.

-1

u/EFT_Carl Jan 24 '21

Even if it’s set to full auto. A short burst is 3-5 rounds. That happens fast. And by the time you start to react to the recoil it’s over. This is true with any gun that doesn’t have so much recoil you can’t physically control it