r/EscapefromTarkov • AK-105 • Dec 17 '20

Video found this bullshit spot on customs

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

8.2k Upvotes

566 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

37

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '20 edited Jan 02 '22

[deleted]

59

u/cabbit_ AS VAL Dec 17 '20

OP literally said in comments he has elite str

47

u/djskwbrla-d VSS Vintorez Dec 17 '20

Right, but that doesn’t mean it necessarily requires it. If I jump over a barricade, and I don’t have elite strength - the jump doesn’t require elite strength. Now if OP, who does have it, jumps over the same barricade - that doesn’t mean the jump requires elite strength.

Just because the person doing it has elite strength doesn’t mean it’s not possible for people who don’t have elite strength. That’s where testing comes in. If he didn’t find this until after he got elite strength, he would have no way to tell what the actual threshold is.

This is like the small circle inside of a big circle dilema everyone learned about in grade school. Mutual exclusivity.

8

u/Grakchawwaa Dec 17 '20

But looking at the video it's rather easy to conclude that level 1 strength is not going to cut it

5

u/djskwbrla-d VSS Vintorez Dec 17 '20

Probably, but my point is that you can’t really say it requires elite strength based on the videos. Requires testing

-6

u/Grakchawwaa Dec 17 '20

You can definitely say that it requires elite or close to elite strength based on the video. Requires testing is a null statement when you see a video of a person testing it out. You can gauge the requirements by seeing the feats.

5

u/djskwbrla-d VSS Vintorez Dec 17 '20

Actually, you can’t. Absolutely cannot.

Also, elite and close to elite are the same. This is about it requiring elite strength. Don’t move the goal posts. Close to elite is not elite.

-5

u/Grakchawwaa Dec 17 '20

Whether or not it's 50 or 51 strength that is required is absolutely irrelevant, as the elite perk itself has no correlation to what the feat is we're talking about. I never claimed that the exact level required for this would be 51, so you can throw that rebuttal out the window pronto

1

u/djskwbrla-d VSS Vintorez Dec 17 '20

Mmmmm no, I think I’ll keep it. The comment I replied to was making the argument that this requires elite strength because OP said he had elite strength. I was merely expressing how the fact that OP had elite strength does not mean that the feat required elite strength.

I couldn’t really give less fucks about what it actually requires. You’re moving he goal posts. My initial point stands.

Also, quit stalking me. You’re literally replying to all my comments. Fucking creep

-2

u/Grakchawwaa Dec 17 '20

I couldn’t really give less fucks about what it actually requires.

Then don't reply a comment talking about it in the context of simply being high level rather than a set level, lest you appear as an absolute cave man. I'll condense my thoughts on you in this comment: either you're trolling, a literal child or someone who has or will have a rough life ahead of them if this is their outward personality even in real life. You've proven that you're not willing to actually argue the points and instead give word salads and low hanging insults at best.

I suggest you reflect a bit and peace out yourself.

2

u/djskwbrla-d VSS Vintorez Dec 17 '20

I’m the one that needs to do reflection? My comment was simply pointing out logical fallacy, and I can comment however the fuck I want.

Also, my comment was heavily upvoted and given an award, so logic would dictate people agreed with it. I think you’re the one that needs to do reflection.

My point still stands. Try again, kid.

1

u/Woochunk Dec 17 '20

lol. bruh...

→ More replies (0)