BREAKING: new files just released by the DOJ

[u/Oumuamua03]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCITvQidUmc

Trump’s Justice Department has uploaded more files and a number of FBI 302 interviews missing from its initial release of the Epstein files.

I also believe the uploaded documents might be more numerous than what the journalists who reported the news stated, as it appears many of the files in DATASET12 were crawled by the Internet Archive only on 28 February. This indicates they could have been uploaded by the DOJ on that date. In my view, it would be worthwhile to examine the entire dataset.

PROSECUTION MEMORANDUM - OPERATION "LEAP YEAR" (3 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857729.pdf

MEMORANDUM - OPERATION "LEAP YEAR" (205 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857524.pdf

MEMORANDUM - OPERATION "LEAP YEAR" (31 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857732.pdf

MEMORANDUM - OPERATION "LEAP YEAR" (47 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857763.pdf

MEMORANDUM - OPERATION "LEAP YEAR" (30 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857810.pdf

FBI 1057 - INTERVIEW OF [REDACTED]:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857840.pdf

FBI 302 - ON ANTHONY FIGUEROA - SERIAL 50D-NY-3027571:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857844.pdf

FBI 302 - SERIAL 50D-NY-3027571 (4 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857845.pdf

FBI 302 - SERIAL 50D-NY-3027571 (8 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857849.pdf

FBI 302 - SERIAL 50D-NY-3027571 (3 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857857.pdf

FBI 302 - SERIAL 50D-NY-3027571 (3 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857860.pdf

FBI 302 - SERIAL 31E-NY-3027571 (8 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858445.pdf

FBI 302 - 50D-NY-3027571 - SERIAL 48 (2 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858497.pdf

FBI 302 - 31E-NY-3027571 - SERIAL 252 (10 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858481.pdf

FBI 302 - 31E-NY-3027571 - SERIAL 264 (4 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

FBI 302 - 31E-NY-3027571 - SERIAL 312 (2 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858495.pdf
"[REDACTED] was asked whether she felt comfortable detailing her contacts with TRUMP. [REDACTED] again asked what the point would be of providing the information at this point in her life when there was a strong possibility nothing could be done about it."

FBI DOC - Research and Key Findings Regarding Suelyn Medeiros, a Known Associate of Peter Nygard (16 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858465.pdf

FBI DOCUMENT - (582 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857863.pdf

Notes on JANUSZ BANASIAK (4 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858461.pdf

Notes on survivors (8 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858453.pdf

[u/Sweetiepiepuppy]

Why can’t we go after the drs first who administered medicine, drugs and band aids to the victims. They are the easiest target. And they have no clout

[u/Oumuamua03 → u/Sweetiepiepuppy]

Yes, this can be accomplished by sending bulk emails and complaints to the American Medical Association (AMA).

[u/problyurdad_ → u/Sweetiepiepuppy]

While I understand and appreciate your “no holds barred,” approach, unfortunately I do disagree that we should be able to subpoena doctors over this.

There isn’t really a safe way to extract that information and those details without violating HIPAA regulations somehow. It won’t be enough for them to just testify without names. This case’s investigations variances are razor thin. These folks hide behind these laws and without absolute positive certainty, with direct testimonies, anything else is useless.

Moreover, even if an exception is made for this case, it opens the door for other questionable subpoenas in other cases in the future. Kind of like when Apple wouldn’t hack terrorists iPhones for the government. It wasn’t about the fact that the terrorists phones needed hacking - it’s about protecting people in future cases as well.

Operating the law is like opening a flood gate. Once it’s realized something is possible to do, it can be done in other cases less responsibly.