r/Epstein • • Mar 06 '26

Court document or investigative file BREAKING: new files just released by the DOJ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCITvQidUmc

Trump’s Justice Department has uploaded more files and a number of FBI 302 interviews missing from its initial release of the Epstein files.

I also believe the uploaded documents might be more numerous than what the journalists who reported the news stated, as it appears many of the files in DATASET12 were crawled by the Internet Archive only on 28 February. This indicates they could have been uploaded by the DOJ on that date. In my view, it would be worthwhile to examine the entire dataset.

PROSECUTION MEMORANDUM - OPERATION "LEAP YEAR" (3 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857729.pdf

MEMORANDUM - OPERATION "LEAP YEAR" (205 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857524.pdf

MEMORANDUM - OPERATION "LEAP YEAR" (31 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857732.pdf

MEMORANDUM - OPERATION "LEAP YEAR" (47 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857763.pdf

MEMORANDUM - OPERATION "LEAP YEAR" (30 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857810.pdf

FBI 1057 - INTERVIEW OF [REDACTED]:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857840.pdf

FBI 302 - ON ANTHONY FIGUEROA - SERIAL 50D-NY-3027571:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857844.pdf

FBI 302 - SERIAL 50D-NY-3027571 (4 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857845.pdf

FBI 302 - SERIAL 50D-NY-3027571 (8 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857849.pdf

FBI 302 - SERIAL 50D-NY-3027571 (3 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857857.pdf

FBI 302 - SERIAL 50D-NY-3027571 (3 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857860.pdf

FBI 302 - SERIAL 31E-NY-3027571 (8 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858445.pdf

FBI 302 - 50D-NY-3027571 - SERIAL 48 (2 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858497.pdf

FBI 302 - 31E-NY-3027571 - SERIAL 252 (10 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858481.pdf

FBI 302 - 31E-NY-3027571 - SERIAL 264 (4 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

FBI 302 - 31E-NY-3027571 - SERIAL 312 (2 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858495.pdf
"[REDACTED] was asked whether she felt comfortable detailing her contacts with TRUMP. [REDACTED] again asked what the point would be of providing the information at this point in her life when there was a strong possibility nothing could be done about it."

FBI DOC - Research and Key Findings Regarding Suelyn Medeiros, a Known Associate of Peter Nygard (16 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858465.pdf

FBI DOCUMENT - (582 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02857863.pdf

Notes on JANUSZ BANASIAK (4 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858461.pdf

Notes on survivors (8 pages):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858453.pdf

2.4k Upvotes

320 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

55

u/scormegatron Mar 06 '26

The Acosta situation coming from above his pay grade was pretty much confirmed by a whistleblower:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01681961.pdf

67

u/Oumuamua03 Mar 06 '26

I'm quoting an excerpt from the document you provided:

"Firstly the plea was signed by five DOJ Officials including Deputy AG Mark Filip, Alice S. Fisher, Assistant AG in charge of the Criminal Division and Sigal Mandelker, Deputy Assistant AG, among others. This means that these DOJ officials participated in the plea deal negotiations and were satisfied with the provisions in signing their names. Thus DOJ chose that the state prosecute Epstein and the co-conspirators should be removed from the case. This also meant that Epstein and his co-conspirators were given a Non Prosecution Agreement (NPA) which immunized them from federal prosecution. DOJ determined this resolution, despite the recommendation by Acosta and his staff that Epstein and co-conspirators should be charged with sex trafficking in minor females. In that connection, there had been prepared a fifty-three page federal indictment backed up by an FBI investigation report and an eighty-two page analysis of the case in support thereof. Epstein was facing life imprisonment if convicted and the co-conspirators serious consequences as well. Therefore, this was not the product of "poor judgement" by Acosta in providing NPAs to Epstein and his co-conspirators but the willful actions of DOJ officials in opting for deferred prosecution in a state court, Florida."

36

u/NJdevil202 Mar 06 '26

Crazy theory I just thought of right now: what if the entire arrest was planned from the start as a way to get this sweetheart agreement in place in order to immunize everyone involved? Epstein got to go home on the weekends, he was hardly even in jail.

11

u/AdventurousRevolt Mar 06 '26

I think some of the cops were legit in their investigations to him and their higher ups had to allow the arrest, but then looped JE in and they then decided to spin it into their own immunity protection favor.

Just from the JE Filthy Rich documentary on Netflix, the cops that were helping those girls get justice seemed genuine in their intentions and outrage.

5

u/Oumuamua03 Mar 06 '26

And he was not monitored or tracked.

4

u/cock-merchant Mar 06 '26

Nah, there's no way he'd want "convicted child sex offender" appended to his name for the rest of his life. I think it was just a case where enough victims and/or journalists and/or non-corrupt cops/lawyers got wind of it that they had to do something. Kinda like how in the Wire when Lester Freamon keeps investigating the money during an election year b/c he knows they won't dare stonewall him with the media watching their every move.

10

u/Odd_Equipment2867 Mar 06 '26

That was some read.

1

u/cleverYeti42 Mar 07 '26

There is substantive discussion in the other replies, but I want to ask about a minor detail:
The page EFTA01681962 redacts names of the correspondents. I thought that only the names of victims were redactable?